Jira vs Micro Focus ALM Octane comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
Read 107 Jira reviews
45,264 views|33,198 comparisons
Micro Focus Logo
10,550 views|5,681 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on May 11, 2022

We performed a comparison between Jira and Micro Focus Alm Octane based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Jira’s users say installation and setup are straightforward and simple. In contrast, Micro Focus users say its setup is very complex, especially if you have a shared workspace concept.

  • Features: Ease of use is one of the most valuable features Jira users mentioned. There are a lot of graphs and tracking. They love the Issue Navigator feature, which lets you customize user stories. The integration of third-party vendors into their marketplace is functional. There are downsides, though. The Epic Link feature is not user-friendly when the background is dark. Capturing metrics is also challenging.

    Regarding Micro Focus ALM Octane, reviewers say key features are usability and ease of learning. Users also say it is very intuitive to use. The reporting capabilities are another favorite feature because there are a lot of predefined reports. However, the security integration could be improved. Users also would like to see more customization in the reporting features.
  • Pricing: Jira’s users consider the price affordable at the entry level. However, the price for upper tiers is steep. Micro Focus users consider the price affordable, although when compared with Jira, it’s on the higher side.

  • Service and Support: Several Jira users state that they work with a support company. The ones that used Jira support say technical support is excellent, knowledgeable, and responsive. Micro Focus users say the technical support is also great, with almost instant feedback for easy tickets.

Comparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Jira is a bit ahead of Micro Focus. Our reviewers found Micro Focus to be more complex to install and to have weaker security integrations. Its price point is more pleasing than Jira’s however.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. Micro Focus ALM Octane Report (Updated: May 2023).
708,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I have found the most valuable features of Jira to be ticketing, life cycle workflow, definition, and creation. Many of the features are useful.""The product is good, stable and very cost-effective for small teams.""It is a very convenient tool. We can organize our sprints through scrum or kanban. There are scrum boards, and there are kanban boards. If you prefer scrum, you can use Jira. If you prefer kanban, you can still use Jira. You can create your kanban boards in a similar way as you create your scrum boards. It is very useful. It also seems to be very popular these days.""The most valuable feature of Jira is that it's a well-known tool that many people are familiar with.""We've found the scalability to be good.""Jira offers tools for managing projects using Agile methodology. I think it is good to encourage the development team to use Jira, so that the organization benefits from the proper execution of projects on time. Basically, it helps our organization to execute in a better way.""It is user-friendly, and you can manage your project according to the methodology you want. It is also easy to configure.""We love the bulk edit feature. Jira also integrates well with Bitbucket."

More Jira Pros →

"I like the fact that you can use it on top of Jira.""The most useful feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the dashboards, they are easy to use.""The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the reports. We are able to do customization.""The filtering options are very good once you learn them. The document reports are also valuable. You can create reports in Word and PDF formats. That's very useful.""Current version of the solution is fairly stable.""The feature I found most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its ability to integrate with the CI/CD stack.""Micro Focus' technical support is good.""The dashboards and metric reporting are valuable features."

More Micro Focus ALM Octane Pros →

"I'm mostly focusing on the requirements traceability with my thesis, the integration could improve for other tools. The companies are not only using Jira. For example, for the test cases or for the documents templates, we are using Polarion and we have been having some integration issues.""Could be more intuitive.""In Jira, sometimes developers are not getting alerts when Jira is moving out of the SLA to the product development team.""We'd like to see Jira have more integration with a development ID.""It is not user-friendly.""There are a limited number of gadgets accessible in Jira; thus, additional ones should be supported.""So at one point in time, they did a huge UI upgrade. At that time, I felt like they had changed something, so it was hard to figure out. Now that we are habituated, it's not an issue now.""An area for improvement in Jira is that it's not designed for test management. To use it for test management, you need an add-on or several add-ons, e.g. Xray or Zephyr."

More Jira Cons →

"The reporting is lacking from a requirements matrix and a traceability perspective.""I like their smart analytics; perhaps they should continue to expand and improve there because it's a fantastic start.""It would help us if ALM Octane got FedRAMP-certified, so our government departments could use the cloud solution. That way our external consultants could access it. We've created a URL to get to it, but if it were FedRAMP-certified and service and had support in the continental United States, that would be better.""Currently, Micro Focus ALM Octane is considered an old-world tool in the industry and lacks the perception of being a new-age tool among its customers.""The solution should improve by adding scrum board-like functionality.""What could be improved in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its integration with Jira.""Though Micro Focus ALM Octane doesn't have much of a bug, it lacks integration with some solutions. For example, my company has fairly new software, but it can't be integrated with Micro Focus ALM Octane, so integration with other software, particularly with less popular software, could be improved. Micro Focus ALM Octane also requires a lot of resources during its setup, and I find this another area for improvement. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the ability to customize the interface, especially when doing a manual test.""The biggest problem with ALM Octane is that it's very complex, so it's difficult to use and scale."

More Micro Focus ALM Octane Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is much higher than other similar solutions available in the market, and as such, the vendor should think about a price reduction to make this product more affordable."
  • "For very small companies, if you have less than 10 individuals, it is $10 a year for each of the products. When we were a part of the enterprise and had more than 10 people using it, or before they came up with this solution for small companies, it was $2,500 a year for the license for Jira and Confluence, and I believe something like $600 a year to perpetuate the license. I can't remember if it was $600 or $2,500 annually. It was for up to 25 people at the time, and this was in the early 2000s and mid 2000s."
  • "If you are using just Jira, it is cheap, but if you start to use it and you feel you need some more services or more functions, then you have to buy add-ons, which can make it expensive."
  • "The price of the solution could be lower."
  • "We currently have ten users, and it is free for ten users."
  • "I think the starter pack of three users, up to five users, is free. So you can try it out."
  • "We had a perpetual license but have changed to a subscription."
  • "Its price is good and similar to other products. It is about five or six dollars per user."
  • More Jira Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a conversion fee for changing licenses."
  • "The cost of this product is very high."
  • "The senior management of my company handles the purchases of the solution. However, the price per developer was a major reason we switched from Jira. Apart from the complexity and the support, the price was a major reason that a team of 20 people unanimously decided that we would prefer to go with Micro Focus ALM Octane rather than Jira. The senior management had seen some benefit in it and they preferred it over Jira because the per developer cost was less and the support was superior."
  • "ALM Octane is very expensive."
  • "If you compare the price with the functionality, it is pretty much the same as other solutions. If you compare it to Jira, for instance, it has a lot more functionality. You don't need any plug-ins, but it's also more expensive. Once you start adding your different plug-ins to Jira, you'll probably end up with the same amount or more. There is also a yearly support cost, which is usually 25% of the initial cost of the license."
  • "In my opinion, it's good value for the price that you pay."
  • "I rate the tool's pricing an eight on a scale from one to ten, where ten is very expensive."
  • "The price of Micro Focus ALM Octane is too high compared to other solutions."
  • More Micro Focus ALM Octane Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    708,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Harshal Vora
    reviewer1933914 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1933914 ( Business Consultant at MFGS, Inc.)

    ALM Octane integrates easily out of the box with Jira, 
    additionally, once you DevSecOps users are onboard to Octane, 
    they will realize Octane does more, so they can reduce their dependence on Jira. 
    Several of my customers have come to this realization. 
    Octane is an Enterprise solution, but Jira is not. 

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the… more »
    Top Answer:Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalable… more »
    Top Answer:HP ALM and Jira can be easily integrated with the aid of a third-party Integration Solution. To help you select the right integration approach and tool, you should first define your integration… more »
    Top Answer:It is a very stable tool. The tool has been in the industry for so many years. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
    Top Answer:The pricing of the tool falls in the mid-range zone. When you compare it to other similar tools, I would say it's on the expensive side. The licensing costs for the tool are not straightforward and… more »
    Top Answer:In terms of improvements, it would be beneficial for Micro Focus ALM Octane to have the ability to interface with newer page tools that support DevOps for operations and testing. Currently, Micro… more »
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Jira Software
    Micro Focus Octane
    Learn More

    Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate. 

    Jira Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

    • DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.
    • Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution. 
    • Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways. 

    Jira Features

    • Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.
    • Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.

    • Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts. 

    Reviews from Real Users

    Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard. 

    Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

    Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.” 

    Micro Focus ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. Micro Focus fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.

    ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.

    Learn more about Jira
    Learn more about Micro Focus ALM Octane
    Sample Customers
    Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
    Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
    Top Industries
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company8%
    Educational Organization21%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider28%
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Transportation Company20%
    Consumer Goods Company4%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise83%
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise79%
    Buyer's Guide
    Jira vs. Micro Focus ALM Octane
    May 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. Micro Focus ALM Octane and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
    708,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 107 reviews while Micro Focus ALM Octane is ranked 4th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 14 reviews. Jira is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus ALM Octane is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jira writes "Great for collaboration, very stable, and extracting data is straightforward". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Octane writes "A stable solution used for test management that is perceived to be an outdated tool by its customers". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, Polarion ALM, Rally Software and TFS, whereas Micro Focus ALM Octane is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Rally Software, GitLab and TFS. See our Jira vs. Micro Focus ALM Octane report.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.