Jedox vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

Jedox and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Jedox is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.1. Jedox holds a 5.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 10.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jedox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

820 Views
585 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Read 56 Oracle Hyperion reviews

2,475 Views
1,614 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Jedox

Oracle Hyperion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle Hyperion and Jedox are powerful solutions competing in enterprise performance management. Oracle Hyperion holds a competitive edge with its scalability and robust planning capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive financial processes. Jedox, however, is favored for its flexibility, offering agile reporting solutions.

Features: Oracle Hyperion is known for its robust calculation engine, extensive ERP integration, and scalability, supporting large budget cycles. Jedox provides intuitive dashboarding, easy data integration from various sources, and dynamic reporting, suitable for organizations seeking interactive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Hyperion needs to enhance its documentation, support responsiveness, and address performance issues with large datasets. Jedox could improve its front-end design, modernize its user interface, and refine its technical support framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Hyperion offers on-premises and hybrid cloud options, providing flexibility but facing criticism for inconsistent technical support. Jedox presents public cloud deployment but also has reported issues with support consistency. Customer service for both indicates room for improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Hyperion is a premium choice, suited for large enterprises justifying the cost with extensive feature use, offering significant ROI through efficiency gains. Jedox is more cost-effective, appealing to smaller businesses with scalable needs, and offers flexible licensing for better accessibility and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Jedox is 5.7%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 10.7%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Riyaz Halani

Financial Controller at Zalando SE

Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance

I would rate the scalability of Jedox a seven out of ten. There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself. So that's where the main improvements lie—making it easy for people to not depend on just technical finance teams. There are almost 50 to 60 users using Jedox in our organization.

Read full review

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at Infosys

Automation of financial processes streamlines operations but pricing needs improvement

Our clients mostly use Hyperion for their financial requirements, including budgeting, forecasting, and planning The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel. The workflow management of planning and the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions."

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"The solution is very versatile."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

More Jedox pros

"This solution provides a more structured methodology for doing analysis than a tool like Excel. It creates a central database that keeps all information in one place."

"Functionality-wise, it is what they say it is. It is the best in class, but it all ties back to your users. If your users are completely enamored with Excel spreadsheets, then breaking those habits is hard."

"The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel."

"The scalability is good."

"We have found there is excellent stability with Oracle Hyperion."

"Scalability isn't a problem for Hyperion."

"Oracle has an integrated solution for Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) and Hyperion. It keeps the two platforms opened up to each other."

"The platform is very easy to use from a user perspective, especially for nontechnical experts."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

Cons

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

"I don't find it particularly user-friendly."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

More Jedox cons

"The analytical side of the product could be better and needs to be improved."

"Oracle EPM Cloud solutions have simplified the security model. Nevertheless, it would be better having a more differentiated security model."

"The solution is about to cease to exist, so it doesn't really matter if they add anything to it. It's at end-of-life."

"Improvements are needed in the tool's performance."

"There's something known as a data block that Hyperion generates for each and every transaction. Sometimes it does not generate and we need to identify those issues and fix them manually."

"Integrating Oracle Hyperion, a multidimensional database, with relational databases poses challenges due to the differing database structures."

"Hyperion has much room for improvement, especially disaster recovery. You don't have the option to choose the proper disaster recovery method. We have Hyperion and an SQL server on the backend. We have active solutions for the backend database server, which aren't working for our people. They've asked us to remove the high availability to increase application performance."

"Their documentation could be a little bit more descriptive at places. They don't really do a lot of How-Tos because that gets pushed through to the consulting groups. There have been some books. There is a real good one out there about how to look smarter than you are with Hyperion Planning that some people at a company called ArganoInterRel wrote. Those things do exist, but that's not in their documentation. It's basically like they'll say, "This is the field. This is what it's used for," but they don't tell you how to particularly use it in your case environment."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"Excellent value for money."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"We pay for licensing yearly."

"The licensing cost for the on-premises version of the solution is too high."

"The solution is affordable."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Retailer

13%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jedox?

The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jedox?

The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jedox?

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. Th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

Pricing is a significant concern. After moving to PBCS and EPBCS, the per-user license fees can be reduced, particularly for bulk users. For example, a company with fifty users versus five hundred ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

I use Oracle Hyperion ( /products/oracle-hyperion-reviews ) for summarizing data from our ERP ( /categories/erp ) system to gain insights into company performance, such as revenue and profit for a ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 33% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 16% of the time

Tableau vs Jedox

Compared 9% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 8% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 4% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 16% of the time

Tableau vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 15% of the time

Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 10% of the time

OneStream XF vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

April 2025

Download Jedox product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

April 2025

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Also Known As

Jedox EPM

Hyperion

Overview

Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

Jedox

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

Sample Customers

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

April 2025

Free Report: Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

Find out what your peers are saying about Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.