"The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."
"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."
"The latest cloud version is more efficient for financial implementations."
"The roll-up potential of the product is very good, meaning we have detailed information and we want it to be summarized, based on geography, based on different product lines, or based on different charts of accounts in the general ledger. It rolls up the information in a very concise way. This makes it easy to understand the overall performance, for it's forecasting aspects, or quarterly reporting, year to year, or month to month reporting."
"We like the reporting and tracking of financials."
"Hyperion is helpful for all our budget processes."
"Scalability is one of this solution's big plus points."
"It's basically the same as the other budgeting solutions."
"Scalability isn't a problem for Hyperion."
"It is easy to use. It is very intuitive. Even though there is a lot of functionality that comes out of the box, you can customize the solutions to meet your needs. You have the ability to have business rules that produce all kinds of calculations. We're international, and we do all our FX conversions through that."
"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."
"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."
"The forecasting of values could be simplified in this solution."
"The solution is about to cease to exist, so it doesn't really matter if they add anything to it. It's at end-of-life."
"I would love more comment capabilities so that you could put in little notes, cheat notes."
"Oracle Hyperion's scalability could be improved."
"There's something known as a data block that Hyperion generates for each and every transaction. Sometimes it does not generate and we need to identify those issues and fix them manually."
"Oracle Hyperion generally it's quite a complex architecture that is hard to maintain."
"I have a problem with Hyperion when I need to log some changes in the budget. It's hard to know who made which changes in the budget."
"This solution's stability is a little problematic."
Jedox is ranked 7th in Business Performance Management with 2 reviews while Oracle Hyperion is ranked 2nd in Business Performance Management with 24 reviews. Jedox is rated 7.0, while Oracle Hyperion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jedox writes "A flexible solution that helps us to do our planning and see the performance, but it needs more visualization options and better performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Hyperion writes "A mature, extensive solution that scales very effectively". Jedox is most compared with Microsoft BI, IBM Planning Analytics, Tableau, Anaplan and IBM Cognos, whereas Oracle Hyperion is most compared with Anaplan, IBM Cognos, Tableau, IBM Planning Analytics and Infor dEPM. See our Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
