We performed a comparison between JD Edwards World and NetSuite OneWorld based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The ease of use is consistently there."
"The pricing is okay. It's not overly expensive."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards World is its ease of use and unique functions."
"We've found the initial setup to be easy."
"NetSuite is a great solution, fast to bring up and makes everyone's life easier."
"NetSuite OneWorld is a single instance that allows you to do different business functions, such as reporting, order-to-cash, design-build, and procure-to-pay. This feature is what's most valuable in the solution."
"The ability to customize it to create custom fields that are reportable, and then to be able to write script behind it to automate other processes that might otherwise be manual is great."
"The solution is scalable."
"Lowers costs, produces higher efficiencies, while maintaining a leaner staff and produces advanced financials."
"Embedded business intelligence is a valuable feature. There is also no need to wait for extract functions, and each transaction is reflected in the system dashboards in real time."
"Inventory management in NetSuite OneWorld is one of the best in the industry, so this feature is what I like most about the solution."
"There are a lot of new technologies coming out and JD Edwards World could improve by having better integration with other databases. The integration with the databases and applications should be in real-time, such as with Oracle."
"There is no support from Oracle here. We only have third-party support."
"The integration technology could be stronger at this point."
"Its end of life is already announced, so I don't expect lots of improvement coming from the product anywhere anymore."
"There is not a 20 year pedigree of pharma experience in the NetSuite channel. While there are many of these CMO Pharma companies rapidly moving to NetSuite, there are few consultants with true pharma experience. Those who have experience are stretched pretty thin."
"Currently, NetSuite OneWorld needs to be more mature, especially compared to SAP."
"In NetSuite OneWorld, what needs improvement is the production planning functionality."
"Project collaboration through Dashboard Business Management and Relations Management is easy to perform, but it does need to be worked on as it is difficult for customers, suppliers, and internal users to use."
"If you were to use standard costs, it doesn't handle standard costs well."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
JD Edwards World is ranked 20th in ERP with 4 reviews while NetSuite OneWorld is ranked 12th in ERP with 6 reviews. JD Edwards World is rated 7.2, while NetSuite OneWorld is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of JD Edwards World writes "Familiar, easy to use, and offers good functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite OneWorld writes "Customizable with great integration capabilities and very good stability". JD Edwards World is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP S/4HANA and Pronto Xi, whereas NetSuite OneWorld is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP Business One, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, PeopleSoft and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. See our JD Edwards World vs. NetSuite OneWorld report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.