Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs NetSuite ERP vs PeopleSoft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.0
Users report financial benefits from JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, citing stability, cost savings, and minimal resources needed for support.
Sentiment score
5.7
Users reported immediate ROI with NetSuite ERP, citing superior currency handling, improved service, reporting, and error reduction versus QuickBooks.
Sentiment score
6.1
PeopleSoft offers cost-efficient ROI, maintained with minimal resources, outperforming costlier systems like Oracle and SAP in user satisfaction.
Previously, there was significant development for customizations, but with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, the necessary reports are readily available, reducing maintenance costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.6
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's technical support is responsive and competent, but complex issues may require preparation and persistence for resolution.
Sentiment score
4.7
NetSuite ERP customer service is praised for premium support but criticized for delays and expertise issues in lower tiers.
Sentiment score
4.5
PeopleSoft's customer service is satisfactory, but users desire quicker, more detailed support, especially for complex issues and upgrades.
They act quickly, and the partners stay up-to-date with the latest innovations.
The technical support is a strong point, and I would rate it an eight on a scale of one to ten.
I would rate the customer service and support of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a seven out of ten.
If a customer designs custom applications and encounters issues, PeopleSoft will not provide service for those custom applications.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne efficiently scales across businesses, ensuring reliable integration despite challenges, making it suitable for diverse industries.
Sentiment score
7.7
NetSuite ERP is scalable for mid to large companies, though performance may slow during high transaction volumes.
Sentiment score
7.6
PeopleSoft is scalable and adaptable, excelling in performance and integration, though complex applications may pose challenges.
It is suitable for any business size, from retail to manufacturing, and can grow with any business.
For golden partners, NetSuite ERP provides more options and enhanced reliability for scalability.
This rating reflects the limitation that custom applications do not receive support.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is generally reliable with most users reporting high stability, especially with proper maintenance and updates.
Sentiment score
7.4
NetSuite ERP is highly stable with 99.9% uptime, though improper configuration can cause issues, according to users.
Sentiment score
7.4
PeopleSoft is valued for its stability, consistent performance, customization, and quick resolution of rare bugs, despite minor issues.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is very stable.
I rate the stability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne as a seven out of ten.
For any issues, Workato contacts NetSuite ERP directly to resolve tickets or problems.
Small issues take maximum one to two hours to resolve, while major issues take up to 12 hours.
 

Room For Improvement

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne needs improvements in UI, reporting tools, cloud features, customization, and industry-specific functionalities for better usability.
NetSuite ERP needs improvements in usability, integration, customization, and features, with pricing and AI limitations possibly deterring clients.
PeopleSoft needs improvements in mobile UI, technical support, integration capabilities, and customization complexity, while enhancing performance and design.
JD Edwards should consider implementing more user-friendly interfaces and downloads to aid end users.
There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area.
I would like to see improvements in the analytical part of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, specifically in the business intelligence aspect, to enhance its capabilities compared to bespoke solutions.
The addition of AI features in NetSuite ERP would enable automatic triggering, approval processes, and event streams to IT teams or cross-functional teams.
Professionals are transitioning due to challenges in availability, scalability, and resource allocation.
 

Setup Cost

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers competitive pricing with a perpetual license, ideal for medium to large enterprises, but can incur extra costs.
NetSuite ERP's pricing is flexible but high, with costs depending on users, modules, and potential discounts.
PeopleSoft's pricing is high and variable, with significant costs for licensing, setup, customization, and ongoing support.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications.
 

Valuable Features

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides user-friendly, scalable ERP solutions with extensive integration, customization, and advanced data management for improved business processes.
NetSuite ERP offers role-based interfaces, flexible tools, and seamless integration, enhancing efficiency and scalability for growing businesses.
PeopleSoft excels in customization, integration, and scalability, offering user-friendly features for HR, finance, payroll, and comprehensive analytics.
The integration between plant maintenance, stores, and financials is highly valued by my customers in the refinery business, as it allows for efficient maintenance processes and easily accessible financial information.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne manages multiple manufacturing modes in the same process effectively.
The interface is easily understandable even for a common user, unlike the NetSuite ERP direct website which requires more technical knowledge.
It aids me from an auditing perspective, as it's all system-driven, and cannot be altered.
It provides the easiest way to integrate with third-party applications for data exchange between systems.
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Activity Based Costing Software category, the mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 10.4%, up from 10.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetSuite ERP is 7.2%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PeopleSoft is 8.9%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Activity Based Costing Software
 

Featured Reviews

Eric Oboh - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables efficient finance and maintenance management with real-time data and strong integration
The integration between plant maintenance, stores, and financials is highly valued by my customers in the refinery business, as it allows for efficient maintenance processes and easily accessible financial information. Additionally, the mobile features are beneficial as they allow managers to approve or reject orders on the go. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides real-time data, which is very timely for decision-making. Managers have dashboards created for them that are readily updated for insightful information. This reflects the improved business intelligence features of the solution.
Haggit Russo - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective financial management with real-time analytics and a straightforward setup
Reports are good but not perfect. The custom reports could be improved. The initial setup process for reports can be a bit complicated and may require more user-friendly options. My previous company faced difficulty with reporting when it was too complicated to find proper reports. Overall, improving the reporting feature would be beneficial.
IanCampbell - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time through transclusion - using a single record across multiple modules
The most valuable feature is the module integration, which saves time through transclusion - using a single record across multiple modules. The user interface has improved significantly. The current client redesigns work centers per subsidiary business unit, making navigation more intuitive and easier for end users. Reporting and analytics capabilities have greatly improved.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Activity Based Costing Software solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Construction Company
6%
Government
9%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer servic...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications, and consultancy costs are on the h...
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
I perform complex setups and use flex accounting in different ways. We have both simple projects with basic configura...
What do you like most about NetSuite ERP?
The inventory feature in NetSuite ERP is very valuable to me because it provides clear estimates about the depreciati...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetSuite ERP?
If you buy it through Europe or North America, it is quite expensive. However, if you can buy it from developing mark...
What needs improvement with NetSuite ERP?
Reports are good but not perfect. The custom reports could be improved. The initial setup process for reports can be ...
What are the differences between Oracle HCM Cloud and PeopleSoft?
Although both are solutions to manage HR, their differences make each one suitable for different companies. Oracle C...
What do you like most about PeopleSoft?
I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it wit...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
2Pure, Accuvant, Actian, Adtegrity, Advantage Sign Supply, All-Safe Pool Safety Products, Alton Lane, AMC Liquidators
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, IFS and others in Activity Based Costing Software. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.