"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually."
"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."
"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."
"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."
"The most valuable part of this solution is the security features that it offers."
"This solution is our RMM tool and we love the deployment features."
"The patch management and the remote support are very good, especially the remote support. There is a module built into the solution which allows remote control without necessarily interrupting the user. We could manage things in the background without them seeing or interacting with anything, which is a very useful feature."
"I like the Live Connect module provided by Kaseya. It is a powerful module. I also like the Agent Procedure module. We work with it most of the time."
"When compared to what we were previously using, one of the most appealing features is that it combines remote control, patch management, and software management into a single portal."
"I like the remote control, audit, inventory, patch management, software management, and monitoring features."
"The remote support is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The ease of access and ease of use was great."
"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."
"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."
"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."
"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."
"It never functioned as intended."
"The solution is hard to use at first until you understand how it works."
"The main difference would be the addition of audio transfer between the end-user and the remote connectivity software. That is the one critical piece that we are currently lacking."
"If you compare with other products, Manage Engine has some features that we like but are not present in Kaseya."
"I believe we should include a VSA license to provide complete endpoint management."
"The response to bugs is slow and software improvement comes slowly too. The lack of response to our feature requests made it feel like they were going into a black hole. Additionally, when we encountered bugs or issues with the VSA, they were slow to respond to those too."
"Kaseya VSA could be improved with more features to support the latest operating systems."
"The UI could be streamlined. The menu has 18 options, but we only use three. It has a lot of redundant stuff. Software management, software deployment, patch management, etc., all do the same thing, but they're different programs and licenses."
Ivanti Patch for Windows is ranked 10th in Patch Management with 4 reviews while Kaseya VSA is ranked 5th in Patch Management with 15 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Windows is rated 7.8, while Kaseya VSA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Windows writes "Good device management functionality, contributes to a streamlined patching process, but the reporting needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Broken from the beginning and never functioned as anticipated". Ivanti Patch for Windows is most compared with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and Quest KACE Systems Management, whereas Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and ConnectWise Automate. See our Ivanti Patch for Windows vs. Kaseya VSA report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
