We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and Microsoft Windows Server Update Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The tool is a stable product."
"Compared to Linux, Windows Server’s setup is easier."
"Provides the ability to create multiple downstream servers."
"The performance has been okay."
"Setup is very simple and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is the efficiency once configured."
"The solution has great potential and leaves the user with almost limitless possibilities. It is truly a product with a million uses."
"The most valuable feature is the decreased level of internet usage by my network."
"The most valuable features are that it is included with Windows, and it can be driven by Group Policy Objects (GPOs)."
"The tool needs to improve its visual system."
"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."
"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part."
"The solution's stability could be improved because sometimes, there are some problems in communication and sending updates and patches."
"It would be good if it could deploy third-party patches or applications."
"User interface is outdated and not user-friendly."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services could improve the ease of use."
"Some issues with scalability in larger organizations."
"A few bugs need to be figured out for the security side."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services could improve by being less cumbersome to use. It's somewhat difficult to use, but we manage to get through it."
"There are some bugs in IIS."
More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is ranked 15th in Patch Management with 4 reviews while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is ranked 3rd in Patch Management with 38 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac writes "With good website development capabilities, the solution also provides exceptional stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services writes "Lets us manage all our organization's updates from a single management console". Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is most compared with Ivanti Security Controls, whereas Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is most compared with BigFix, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Quest KACE Systems Management, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune. See our Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.