No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

QuantaStor Platform vs iTernity iCAS FS comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Everpure FlashArray
Sponsored
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
229
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (3rd)
iTernity iCAS FS
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Storage (SDS) (36th), File and Object Storage (48th)
QuantaStor Platform
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Storage (SDS) (38th), File and Object Storage (50th)
 

Featured Reviews

Sowjanya MV - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead at Wipro Limited
Has improved performance for mission-critical workloads and enabled seamless non-disruptive upgrades
The availability is 99.99%, which is the main factor any customer would need because their data should be available whenever they want to access it. This is one main critical thing. It is very easy to upgrade since Pure Storage FlashArray handles it well. Everything is non-disruptive now; previously, there were forklift shifts, but now that is not the case. Pure Storage FlashArray says no to forklift upgrades. Usually hardware requires downtime, but Pure Storage FlashArray has improved their footprint so that they are not asking for downtime; everything is just a non-disruptive activity, which is why customers are more inclined towards Pure Storage FlashArray. Customers want more of the models in their environment due to the performance they are giving, and everything is in one Pure1 Array console where we can view all the models on one page or just an orchestration tool. You don't miss anything; you have replication, notifications about replication, and details about which host groups replication is happening in and if that replication is successful or failed. On a daily basis, our purpose is to create volumes for infrastructure; our daily activities include creating volumes and mapping them to the host, doing any migrations from a VM, clearing the data stores, and carving the volumes to those VMs. One key factor is the data compression with a ratio of 5:1, focusing on space efficiency, inline deduplication, and the compression Pure Storage FlashArray works on; that is a major factor we can suggest to any customer. Analytical capabilities are crucial. Daily, we check the throughput and consumption, and Pure Storage FlashArray provides predictions for one year regarding usage. This prediction helps plan updates well ahead. For support, we just raise a case, and they follow up and get it done. There is also AI readiness, but with the model R2, we don't have much of that AI readiness. For others, we do have AI readiness that predicts capacity based on daily or monthly trends, enabling us to analyze how much space we need or if we need to expand the disk shelf. From an operational point of view, a good feature is that if you accidentally delete a volume, it will be retained in the destroyed state for the next twenty-four hours, which is not the same with any other vendor. I have worked in this storage domain for the past fifteen years, and this option is remarkable, benefiting any L1 or L2 engineer. Additionally, from a compliance perspective, Pure Storage FlashArray has REST APIs enabled. I have not explored automation much, but from a security standpoint, it is strong with encryption data. If you want to automate, you can easily integrate with all clouds and explore Pure Cloud for scheduling workloads, including volume creation. Customers find benefit in Pure Storage FlashArray's single management pane of glass due to the dual controller and active-active setup. If one of the controllers goes down, all workloads automatically shift to the other controller, ensuring their data is safe and accessible at all times. This is a highlighted feature that any customer desires because their data should always be accessible. For SAN workloads, we use Pure Storage FlashArray because for SAN FC fiber channel, we don't use it; we use NetApp for NAS activities. We have clearly split this, so SAN is for mission-critical applications, while network-attached storage handles file systems. This architecture helps us maximize the benefit from Pure Storage FlashArray due to the significant workloads from this giant retail client. From a footprint and energy consumption perspective, you can see energy consumption from the Pure1 storage portal on a daily basis, and it is very compact. The three models we use consume only three units, which is quite low. From a footprint and data center perspective, it doesn't occupy much space. As everything moves to cloud, there are requirements to avoid excess spending on data centers, and Pure Storage FlashArray is efficient in energy consumption and is environmentally friendly.
Use iTernity iCAS FS?
Leave a review
Use QuantaStor Platform?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
900,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business71
Midsize Enterprise37
Large Enterprise159
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which should I choose: HPE 3PAR StoreServ or Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series?
Both are great platforms, but if you are considering all flash solutions, I would recommend you to consider Pure Stor...
What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashArray?
When it comes to Everpure FlashArray ports shown in the GUI, it would be better if, when one of the Pure array ports ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Pure Storage FlashArray
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nielsen, Lamar Advertising, LinkedIn, Betfair, UT-Dallas
1. ABN AMRO 2. AIG 3. Allianz 4. Aon 5. Assurant 6. AXA 7. Bank of America 8. BNP Paribas 9. Citigroup 10. Credit Suisse 11. Deutsche Bank 12. Euler Hermes 13. Fidelity Investments 14. Generali 15. HSBC 16. ING 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Lloyd's 19. MetLife 20. Munich Re 21. Prudential Financial 22. RenaissanceRe 23. Swiss Re 24. The Hartford 25. Tokio Marine 26. Travelers 27. Unum 28. Zurich Insurance
1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Alibaba 8. Allianz 9. Amazon 10. American Express 11. Amadeus 12. AMD 13. Anadolu Efes 14. Ansys 15. Apple 16. Aruba Networks 17. AT&T 18. Autodesk 19. BAE Systems 20. Baidu 21. Bayer 22. Ben & Jerry's 23. Boeing 24. BNP Paribas 25. BMW 26. Cisco 27. Continental 28. Dell Technologies 29. DHL 30. Equinix 31. Ericsson 32. ExxonMobil 33. FedEx 34. Fiat Chrysler 35. Ford 36. Freescale Semiconductor 37. Hitachi 38. Honeywell 39. IBM 40. Intuit 41. Kellogg's 42. Kia 43. L'Oréal 44. McKinsey 45. MetLife 46. Mitsubishi 47. Nissan 48. Nike
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: May 2026.
900,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.