

Parasoft SOAtest and Acunetix compete in the software testing and security market. Based on the comparison, Parasoft SOAtest has an advantage in test automation, while Acunetix is superior in vulnerability detection.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides efficient test automation setup, supports functional tests, and integrates with various tools for end-to-end scenarios. Its capabilities include custom scripting and service virtualization. Acunetix specializes in detecting web vulnerabilities with fast, reliable scans and reduced false positives. It supports CI/CD integration for continuous security assessments.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users report issues with its refresh function, clarity in reporting, and occasional stability, suggesting the need for improved user-friendliness and modern interface support. Acunetix could enhance its pricing model, improve performance during large-scale scans, and better address false positives, making it more cost-effective and efficient in handling complex scans.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is mainly deployed on-premises, receiving high marks for responsive and helpful technical support. Acunetix offers more flexible deployment options, including hybrid and public cloud solutions, with comprehensive customer support that some users find complex in terms of pricing.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is an expensive tool but provides substantial ROI due to its automation efficiency and reduced manual efforts. Acunetix also has high pricing, especially with its domain-based model, which can be costly for enterprises with multiple sub-domains. Both solutions offer value, but Acunetix could benefit from more transparent and flexible pricing to improve user satisfaction.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Acunetix | 2.6% |
| Parasoft SOAtest | 0.9% |
| Other | 96.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.
Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.
What features make Acunetix stand out?Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.
Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.
Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.
What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.