"It's great at alerting users to attempts at phishing and suspicious domains."
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The solution still has a lot of false positives."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
IntSights is ranked 6th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews. IntSights is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IntSights writes "Great at showcasing vulnerabilities, excellent at providing alerts, and offers very good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". IntSights is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatQ, Digital Shadows, ZeroFOX and CyberInt Argos, whereas Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Cisco Threat Grid, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Recorded Future, Trend Micro Deep Discovery and AT&T AlienVault USM.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
