No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infobright DB vs Microsoft Azure HorizonDB comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infobright DB
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
38th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (20th)
Microsoft Azure HorizonDB
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
13th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Database as a Service (DBaaS) (13th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user708987 - PeerSpot reviewer
MySQL DBA at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Excellent reporting server that is compatible with MySQL
We ran into some quirks that Infobright had. We interacted with Infobright's support and were able to resolve them. There still are issues with data replication - Infobright is currently for one server (unless you buy the Infobright appliance). This would mean that redundancy is something you need to implement yourself.
reviewer2898678 - PeerSpot reviewer
Full Stack Software Developer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Event-driven workflows have delivered global low-latency data access and faster user responses
The standout features of Microsoft Azure HorizonDB are its native multi-model support and global distribution with turnkey scaling, along with rich consistency and change feed capabilities. It natively handles document, key-value, graph, and column family data, allowing me to pick the API that matches the workload such as Core SQL, flexible JSON, or MongoDB for existing drivers. It also automatically partitions data across physical nodes and replicates it to any number of regions I configure, providing sub-millisecond latency for both read and write operations globally. The operational features like point-in-time restore for multi-region write conflict resolution and serverless auto-scaling of request units keep the system highly available and cost predictable. Integration of security via managed identities and role-based access control removes the need for secret management, while Azure monitor metrics let us tune the system before throttling occurs. In practice, I utilize these features to build an event-driven microservice platform where every state change is persisted in Microsoft Azure HorizonDB and instantly propagated via change feed through Azure Functions, along with auditing and analytics cached using Azure Redis for ultra-fast dashboard reads. Overall, the benefits provide a relatable low-latency, globally resilient data backbone, and it can automatically scale while minimizing operational overhead for developers. The feature that has the most impact on my work is the built-in change feed. It allows microservices to write a state change to Microsoft Azure HorizonDB and allows downstream consumers to react automatically without polling or using custom synchronization code. The server-side feed scales with throughput and guarantees in-order, nearly real-time delivery for every message. I pair it with Azure Functions to either write audit records for the ELK pipeline or update materialized views in Azure Synapse. This integration helps decouple our core services from analytical and notification layers, dramatically reducing latency. For example, when a ticket moves through the workflow, the change feed triggers a function that both persists the transaction for reporting and invalidates the Redis cache for the UI, resulting in very low latency and end-to-end visibility. It is simpler than the previous code base, and the overall change feed provides real-time relativity, leading to lower operational overhead and scalability for our event-driven architecture. The feature that has given me the biggest productivity boost is the built-in change feed, which I use for persistent changes. For example, as a ticket moves from open to in progress, downstream consumers react automatically without the need for polling or custom sync code. This pattern provides built-in durability, and we can configure multi-region write conflict resolution, keeping the system highly available during regional outages. In practice, this gives us sub-millisecond end-to-end visibility, which is much simpler than before. From a tooling perspective, Microsoft Azure HorizonDB provides built-in support for Azure OpenAI embeddings, allowing us to generate vectors on the fly in serverless functions and write them back into the same container. Managed indices automatically scale our request units while maintaining the same multi-region replication and consistency guarantees, keeping latency low and the system highly available. In practice, I have used embeddings in our container to power a real-time FAQ bot, where each incoming question receives embeddings and triggers a function that queries the vector index, producing results for users within milliseconds. This setup eliminates the need for a separate search microservice and streamlines our architecture. Overall, the AI extension adds significant value by simplifying our embedding workloads while maintaining Microsoft Azure HorizonDB's reliability. I find the AI output from Microsoft Azure HorizonDB to be both accurate and reliable for most of our use cases. It consistently meets expectations as the service uses OpenAI embeddings with multi-region replication guarantees that we trust for transactional data. The vector index delivers results with millisecond latency, and in practice, we built a FAQ that shows relevance scores comparable to a dedicated search service, enabling users to see the correct answer about 92% of the time. Occasional mismatches typically stem from the underlying language model rather than the storage layer itself. The change feed-driven pipelines ensure that new or updated content is indexed almost instantly, keeping the model fresh with no need for re-indexing. Overall, these extensions have met my expectations for accuracy and reliability, delivering fast and dependable embedding search while keeping the architecture simple and highly available.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Infobright gave us the ability to avoid significant changes in our data structure and just use Infobright like BigDataMySql."
"We now have multiple times faster queries in comparison to MS SQL."
"Infobright allowed us to reduce the number of moving parts and complexity that we had while providing good performance to produce our reports."
"It is very straightforward and easy to work with."
"A valuable feature was the use of a columnar database for large, ever-growing, big datasets."
"The high compression and the relatively fast load for a free product."
"ICE helped us improve the speed for the “group-by” query by 10x."
"The performance of ad hoc aggregation queries is superior to any RDBMS that I have used and I have used them all."
"I am impressed by how they have detached the database from the core CPU engine of the compute and pushed out a lot of the code to the storage tier, making backup, recovery, and replication significantly faster than previous releases."
"Microsoft Azure HorizonDB has positively impacted my organization by reducing latency issues, improving performance, and providing a good recovery time."
"Since we are in the proof of concept phase, we have noticed some early improvements and potential benefits that stand out so far in terms of speed, reliability, and ease of management."
"By persisting every state change, such as a ticket moving from open to in progress, into a single Cosmos container using the ticket ID as a partition key, we achieve automatic horizontal scaling with sub-millisecond read/write latencies across different regions."
"Microsoft Azure HorizonDB has been highly scalable for our workloads, allowing us to accommodate increases in application traffic, user activity, and data volumes without manually provisioning and managing additional database infrastructure."
"Using Microsoft Azure HorizonDB provides better scalability and performance in terms of database administration."
 

Cons

"On the contrary, we have switched back to the MS SSAS Tabular Model, because of pricing policy."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"We didn’t purchase the Enterprise Edition because it was too expensive for a product that wasn’t going to replace our main DWH database (Oracle), but was, somehow, only an addition for it."
"When running a complex subquery, the system hangs without giving the user any response."
"MPP, distributed processing!!! And better integration with Hadoop."
"There still are issues with data replication - Infobright is currently for one server (unless you buy the Infobright appliance)."
"There was no scalability at all. Infobright didn't permit any changes in tables."
"After all the re-work to our product to remove as much reliance on Infobright, and the extra hardware costs we had to absorb, there was definitely a negative return on investment."
"I want to say that the costing of Microsoft Azure HorizonDB is too high and should be less."
"The only reason I do not rate it a perfect 10 is that I would prefer to see richer server-side query features and more granular cost forecasting in the portal, which would streamline development and debugging tasks."
"While the performance of Microsoft Azure HorizonDB is generally good, we have noticed that it can be more challenging during periods of higher application traffic and larger data volumes, with the impact being more noticeable when workloads generate a high number of concurrent read and write operations or when queries involve larger data sets, as poorly optimized or partitioned usage can result in higher resource consumption and require additional tuning."
"So far, I have not seen any return on investment from Microsoft Azure HorizonDB in terms of cost."
"Regarding needed improvements, I feel that we need more documentation on Microsoft Azure HorizonDB."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
22%
Construction Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure HorizonDB?
Our experience with Microsoft Azure HorizonDB's pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been generally positive, as there was no major upfront hardware or infrastructure investment due to it bei...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure HorizonDB?
While the performance of Microsoft Azure HorizonDB is generally good, we have noticed that it can be more challenging during periods of higher application traffic and larger data volumes, with the ...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure HorizonDB?
Microsoft Azure HorizonDB serves as our main use case to support production applications that handle large volumes of semi-structured and frequently changing data, and we use it as a scalable NoSQL...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Infobright
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. Microsoft Azure HorizonDB and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.