Imperva SecureSphere Database Security vs McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] comparison

"The most valuable feature is the Data Masking."

"We use it for database security, vulnerability analysis, discovery, and handling requests from applications and users."

"The technical support for Imperva is super, super, super."

"The solution provides significant benefits such as compliance and security. Its data risk analytics tool helps reduce numerous events to more manageable incidents."

"The cyber intelligence feature is the most valuable."

"There are three major main use cases of this solution. The first one is to fulfill compliance regulations. Customers—especially the banks, health sector, and manufacturing—need to comply with the regulations in different countries. They have to fulfill compliance regulations around the privacy of data. In order to fulfill those requirements, they're using Imperva. It helps them to fulfill these requirements, and they are not fined by the regulators. That is the first use case why people buy Imperva."

"The product’s most valuable feature is real-time highlights."

"The integration with CounterBreach is great."

"The feature I have found most valuable is activity monitoring."

"The technical support is good; they are knowledgeable."

"The support is very good. They are very quick to respond when we have issues."

"SecureSphere activity log can be used with Imperva CounterBreach in an effort to protect enterprise data from theft and loss caused."

"Improvements can be made in data enrichment and enhancing the GUI (Graphical User Interface) for a better user experience."

"Performance can be slow under heavy loads, but this should be adjusted by scaling."

"I have worked with IBM before, and I prefer its ease of deployment and management. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security has tricky deployment, whereas IBM's deployment is straightforward because of the UI."

"The platform doesn’t support some newer databases."

"I'd like to see some sort of solution for storage."

"Imperva SecureSphere Database Security could improve the database defense feature called camouflage. This feature was responsible for the data mask but now it does not work well and we need another solution. All our banks have teams that are regarded with care and they need to mask sensitive data in order to provide testing to developers."

"Imperva needs to improve their cloud capabilities."

"The UI needs to be improved."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"In the next feature, I'd like to see more integrations and updates overall, specifically bottom tech."

"The price is very high but compared to the price of the overall solution, then I think it's a good deal because the solution itself is great."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and it is a good value for the money."

"Its pricing could be cheaper for the African countries or developing economies. The British pound is valued way more than the currency of most African countries. A better or cheaper pricing model for Nigerian and African customers would be better. It has a per-year subscription model. You pay exactly for what you need. That's all. You don't have to buy what you don't need."

"Imperva SecureSphere Database Security was quite expensive several years ago, but now they provide a subscription plan for licensing. It is available now for smaller and medium-sized companies, not only large enterprises."

"Pricing is low and scalable to add features and volume."

"Imperva is too expensive for small and medium-sized enterprises. They're missing out on technology that helps them manage their data security better. Data security is essential because even the strongest network may be attacked from the inside without it."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive."

"It is very expensive."

"It's not expensive compared to other products that are available."