We performed a comparison between Imanami GroupID and Microsoft Active Directory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Active Directory Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the overall features to be useful."
"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"Active Directory makes managing user policies easier, like when a user wants to share files. We also use it to create and manage our email accounts."
"The ability for a single sign-on for applications."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is an easy-to-use tool."
"I think the main reason we are using Active Directory for SSO Office for single time and for intake integrity capability to other services."
"It is easy to understand all the components."
"The user-friendliness of Microsoft Active Directory is a valuable feature."
"It is an all-in-one solution for cybersecurity and is available at a very low price."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"The security features could be improved."
"There has been a change in the layout of the user information. Previously, I had to go to properties to view the information, but now it is displayed directly below the search results. It takes some time to get used to."
"The interface for logs should be user-friendly and allow for enhanced filtering to drill down to incidents."
"There is room for improvement."
"The cloud service of Microsoft Active Directory is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"If Microsoft is going to add anything to the on-prem solution, it should be an updated GUI."
"I did not have a good experience with the product's tech support. First-level support takes a lot of time since they ask many questions."
"Microsoft Active Directory fails to provide MFA. MFA, which is also known as multi-factor authentication on top of the password and username, is what I would like to see in the product's future releases."
Imanami GroupID is ranked 14th in Active Directory Management with 3 reviews while Microsoft Active Directory is ranked 5th in Active Directory Management with 36 reviews. Imanami GroupID is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Active Directory is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Active Directory writes "A solution that easily merges with cloud-based ADs and provides superior data security". Imanami GroupID is most compared with Netwrix Auditor, ManageEngine ADManager Plus and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Microsoft Active Directory is most compared with PingFederate, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, ManageEngine ADManager Plus and Auth0. See our Imanami GroupID vs. Microsoft Active Directory report.
See our list of best Active Directory Management vendors.
We monitor all Active Directory Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.