IFS Cloud Platform vs SugarCRM Platform comparison

IFS and SugarCRM are both solutions in the CRM category. IFS is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while SugarCRM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5. IFS holds a 0.6% mindshare in CRM, compared to SugarCRM’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IFS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of SugarCRM users who would recommend it.

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 30 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

248 Views
105 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SugarCRM Platform

Read 12 SugarCRM Platform reviews

390 Views
145 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

SugarCRM Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SugarCRM Platform and IFS Cloud Platform operate in the CRM and ERP markets respectively. IFS Cloud Platform is perceived to have an edge with its extensive feature set offering comprehensive operational control.

Features: SugarCRM Platform features customizable sales automation, strong marketing capabilities, and easy integration with open APIs. IFS Cloud Platform offers enterprise management solutions, a robust service catalog, and versatile ERP functionalities.

Room for Improvement: SugarCRM could improve its integration complexity and expand its feature set to cater to larger enterprises. IFS Cloud may benefit from simplifying its interface and enhancing user training options to improve overall user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SugarCRM provides a straightforward deployment process with flexible cloud-based options and well-regarded customer service. IFS Cloud's deployment process is more complex, focusing on enterprise scalability, with strong service support to match larger environments.

Pricing and ROI: SugarCRM is more cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, offering a strong ROI for targeted CRM functionalities. IFS Cloud involves a higher setup cost but delivers a significant ROI with its extensive feature set across diverse business areas.

To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. SugarCRM Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. SugarCRM Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in CRM

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (7th), Field Service Management (1st), Help Desk Software (12th), ERP (13th), Activity Based Costing Software (7th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (2nd), Local Government CRM (8th), IT Asset Management (10th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (11th), License Management (2nd)

SugarCRM Platform

Ranking in CRM

24th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM Customer Engagement Centers (8th), Marketing Automation (7th), Sales Force Automation (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the CRM category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SugarCRM Platform is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

CRM

Featured Reviews

Brendan Fisher

IFS Applications Consultant at Zest Business Process Management Ltd

Robust, customizable, and modern

IFS is a very large and complex software, and implementation of IFS can be challenging and may lead to a difficult lengthy project. It can take between 12 and 24 months in some cases to deploy. I have found that not all clients are fully aware of how big the task is that they're undertaking when they make a decision to move to software like this. Companies need to be more aware of the complexity of an ERP implementation project and while I fully recommend moving to IFS, it is not easy and does require business change when adopting an ERP solution. New features are a difficult ask - I work across multiple industries and everyone would probably choose a different feature. Maybe BIM in Construction or Customs link-ups for importers/exporters.

Read full review

Styliana Araouzou

Senior Operations Analyst at Etoro

Customizable, easy to configure, and reliable

My company is considered a customer and an end-user. I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using right now. It's a company that offers lots of user manuals and you can find most of your stuff there before starting development. I'd advise potential new users to go through everything. I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. By default, it comes with a really good model where you can start working with it without having a lot of developers in your team. It's a system that includes everything related to the client and you can see everything under one screen without having a different product or system. It's been great, for the most part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The financial posting controls are quite handy. The user interface is really friendly, highly flexible, and pretty intuitive for end users."

"I like the connectivity and interfaces. In V10, it's easy to modify the interfaces and layouts, but it's becoming more complicated in the cloud. IFS is excellent at asset maintenance and incident management. They have specialized modules for IFS that cover incident and asset management and everything else connected to finance. The reporting in IFS is also easy to use."

"Feature-wise, I like the way it provides inventory details...It is a stable solution."

"One of our favorite features is the "Info-Zone", which provides operational intelligence in flight and in context to guide both business users and support teams to productivity."

"There are fewer fields on the user screen compared to other products. This makes the UI a little bit easier to understand."

"The solution overall is very versatile and flexible, especially compared to other products."

"What I like about IFS Applications is that it's easier to use and implement than SAP. I also like that the IFS Applications team is more flexible than the SAP team."

"IFS Applications' best feature is the user-friendly interface that has a .NET Framework application in the front end and an Oracle database and WebLogic middleware."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders."

"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."

"The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."

"It has sales email campaigns, plus integration with Active Directory."

"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."

Cons

"Customization needs to be improved."

"Documentation-wise, they need more."

"There should be some improvements in the predefined templates in IFS Applications."

"Sometimes from the sales perspective, clients don't always fully understand how large a task or a project they're getting involved in when they decide, "We're going to switch across to IFS." They could probably do a little bit more, maybe around preparing people for these projects."

"The solution needs to improve its documentation and user-friendliness."

"The solution's reporting tools still require improvement."

"IFS Applications can improve the reporting capabilities and increase the speed of feedback time in the IFS Applications. This would help with the overall performance of the solution and provide better experiences for customers."

"The support provided by IFS Applications has room for improvement. I'm based in Poland, and when my company had an issue, finding people from IFS to give my company the support it needed was difficult."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."

"It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution."

"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."

"You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment."

"I would appreciate it if SugarCRM could support us in on-premise implementation."

"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."

"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"We pay for a license to use the solution, which is not very expensive."

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"There's an additional yearly cost for support."

"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

"The additional cost that comes with the solution includes the overhead of the people who are trying to fix the tool issues. These people are trying to reproduce the issue and report it to the technical support and testing with them which is huge. It is the cost of quality in the end."

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

Engineering Company

17%

Educational Organization

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

I am not able to recall much about batch. Documentation-wise, they need more. There is not much available online, and the documentation availability is on the lower side compared to other products,...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sugar Enterprise?

The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sugar Enterprise?

All are almost the same pricing. Maybe the cheapest is Salesforce, I believe.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sugar Enterprise?

The only challenge was that we implemented it in our on-premise data center instead of using it in the cloud. That was a little bit of a challenge. But it was overcome with the help of SugarCRM com...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 10% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

June 2025

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SugarCRM Platform

June 2025

Download SugarCRM Platform product report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

No data available

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

SugarCRM is a versatile CRM solution that facilitates communication and organization within a company. Its primary use case includes call and comment logging, account relation, customer detail storage, verification handling, transaction tracking, marketing material management, and payment transaction handling. The most valuable functionalities include customizable exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks, as well as its scalability, stability, and low cost. It integrates well with Jira and can be easily configured. The platform improves efficiency, productivity, collaboration, communication, and coordination within organizations, while also providing valuable insights and data analytics for informed decision-making.

SugarCRM

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

Redglaze Group, TengoInternet, Hilco, Bancvue, Vet Adivsor

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. SugarCRM Platform

June 2025

Free Report: IFS Cloud Platform vs. SugarCRM Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. SugarCRM Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. SugarCRM Platform report.

See our list of best CRM vendors.

We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.