IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

IDERA and Zenoss are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. IDERA is ranked #19, while Zenoss is ranked #13. IDERA holds a 2.0% mindshare in EM, compared to Zenoss’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 33% of IDERA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Read 3 IDERA SQL Safe Backup reviews

811 Views
97 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

2,016 Views
242 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Zenoss Cloud and IDERA SQL Safe Backup compete in IT management, focusing on IT infrastructure and database solutions, respectively. Zenoss Cloud seems to have an upper hand in providing holistic monitoring and analytics, while IDERA SQL Safe Backup is strong in specialized database backup and recovery.

Features: Zenoss Cloud provides real-time insights, advanced monitoring, and extensive integration capabilities, catering to comprehensive IT management needs. IDERA SQL Safe Backup offers automated policies, high-speed backups, and customization options suited for SQL server environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud utilizes a flexible and scalable cloud-based model with robust support, ideal for extensive IT environments. IDERA SQL Safe Backup, with on-premises deployment, focuses on strong technical support tailored to database-specific issues.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud usually involves significant initial costs due to its expansive monitoring features but delivers enhanced ROI through improved efficiency. IDERA SQL Safe Backup employs a competitive pricing strategy, offering cost-effectiveness for organizations prioritizing data protection.

To learn more, read our detailed IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. Zenoss Cloud

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Ranking in Event Monitoring

19th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (73rd)

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Event Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (28th), Network Monitoring Software (76th), Server Monitoring (26th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (52nd), Container Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (43rd), AIOps (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IDERA SQL Safe Backup is 2.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 4.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zenoss Cloud	4.2%
IDERA SQL Safe Backup	2.0%
Other	93.8%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

SeniorDB3550

Senior DBA Lead at a government with 10,001+ employees

It has reduced our backup time, however backups do get skipped

I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client. They moved a lot of the features to their web-based version of it. Because of the large number of databases that we have along with our backup, their web product can't handle it. So, we can't use it. So, we are missing out on a lot of the new features. The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection. Unless you can remember day-to-day that you may have something deselected or selected, your view may be different than you expect, and there is no visual indication of it.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The compression, because it drastically reduces the disk space."

"It has reduced our backup time and simplified our backup processes across all the servers."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"It's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

Cons

"I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client."

"The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection."

"Make sure you check your backups on a regular basis. Backups do get missed with this tool, for whatever reason."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. They have a straightforward licensing model."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Performing Arts

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Rubrik vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 22% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 16% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 15% of the time

More IDERA SQL Safe Backup Competitors

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

SCOM vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios Core vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

December 2025

Download IDERA SQL Safe Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

December 2025

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

SQL Safe Backup

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

SQL Safe Backup helps database administrators to back up and recover instantly across SQL Servers. Unlike its competition, it provides virtual databases with access to back up files without consuming disk space, instant restore, centralized management across SQL Servers, and alert notifications for success and failure of operations.

IDERA

Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Woman's Hospital; Sisters of Mercy Hospital System; University Medical Center; MetTel; PPG Industries; 3M; Abbott Laboratories; Comcast; Daimler; GameStop; Hormel Foods; Marriott International; Merck; NCR; United Technologies; City of Lynnwood; Linfosys B.V.; TRI-KES; American Customer Care; Merck & Co., Inc.; Service Corporation International; Fresenius Vascular Care Inc.; Bates White; TechPro Inc.; TW Metals, Inc.; Tulane University; ISO Group; Ameriben Solutions; Instron Corporation; Sentric, Inc.; SPIE; GAS Distribution Company of Thessaloniki and Thessaly SA; American Printing House for the Blind; Paysafe; Freeman Decorating Services, Inc.; Sentric, Inc.; Auburn University; Corporate Communications Group; Sagicor Financial Corporation; Crystal Run Healthcare; Principality Building Society; Experiencias Xcaret; Missoula County; Shellpoint Partners LLC; Solix Inc.; Advicent Solutions, Inc.; Phoenix Newspaper Inc.; Park Place Technologies; Kelly & Associates Insurance Group; Boston Medical Center; Service Corporation International; eResearchTechnology, Inc.

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. Zenoss Cloud

December 2025

Free Report: IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.