IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs Savision Live Maps comparison

IBM and Martello are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. IBM is ranked #61, while Martello is ranked #87. IBM holds a 0.6% mindshare in APM, compared to Martello’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Martello users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

1,151 Views
1,105 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Savision Live Maps

Read 1 Savision Live Maps review

728 Views
612 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Savision Live Maps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Savision Live Maps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,468 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

61st

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Savision Live Maps

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

87th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Savision Live Maps is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager	0.6%
Savision Live Maps	0.4%
Other	99.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Morne' O'Kennedy

Lead specialist at OKCIUS (Pty) Ltd

Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components

Savision continuously develops new modules to allow further integration, so the only item would continue with this effort to allow more-and-more systems to integrate into this platform. Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

"The solution is very stable, and we never had any issues with stability."

"The dashboards and views available are easy to manage and share, and provide all of the metrics required."

"This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM."

Cons

"The user interface was not good."

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

"The user interface was not good."

"Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Construction Company

12%

Government

12%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 13% of the time

meshIQ Platform vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Savision Live Maps

Compared 35% of the time

New Relic vs Savision Live Maps

Compared 29% of the time

SCOM vs Savision Live Maps

Compared 24% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Savision Live Maps

Compared 12% of the time

More Savision Live Maps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download Savision Live Maps product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Live Maps

Overview

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

Business Service Management Visualization & Grouping Tools for Microsoft System Centre

Martello

Sample Customers

Michelin Tire Corp

Municipality of Alphen, Farah Leisure Parks Management LLC, Mail Technology, Austria Card, SMR Automotives

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.