IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs OneLogin comparison

IBM and One Identity are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Additionally, 93% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Read 29 IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] reviews

93% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Read 94 OneLogin reviews

10,342 Views
4,964 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

OneLogin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and OneLogin are competing in the identity and access management sector. Although IBM Tivoli Access Manager offers competitive pricing, OneLogin's advanced features make it a superior product, justifying the higher cost.

Features: IBM Tivoli Access Manager provides robust authentication and access control, risk-based access, and SSO for enterprise settings. OneLogin features advanced single sign-on, comprehensive integration with third-party applications, and SmartFactor Authentication for adaptive security.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli Access Manager could improve by simplifying deployment, enhancing user interface, and expanding integration abilities. OneLogin should focus on expanding customization options, enhancing customer support for technical issues, and reducing the complexity of initial setup procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli Access Manager requires significant technical resources for setup, offering strong legacy system integration support. OneLogin stands out for its simple cloud-based deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring a swift implementation with minimal disruption.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli Access Manager offers competitive pricing favorable for stable environments. OneLogin, despite higher initial costs, provides a strong ROI with scalable solutions, lower maintenance expenses, and flexible pricing options suited to future-proofing business strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,067 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneLogin

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), User Provisioning Software (4th), Identity Management (IM) (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (5th)

Featured Reviews

it_user711612

Senior Consultant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reverse proxy provides central control over authentication and authorization.

It is a single product that caters for all the business needs throughout the organization. It provides a seamless integration that in turn encourages most of the applications to use the SSO features Reverse proxy is the most valuable feature as it provides central control over authentication and…

Read full review

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The combination of TAM with IDM in IBM Tivoli Identity Manager helped us to realize robust and secure authentication infrastructure in accordance with industry regulations and laws."

"The WebSEAL reverse proxy is great for protecting your critical systems."

"OAuth 2 is now the de facto standard for API protection and scoped authorized delegation. IBM TAM now supports OAuth 2 and can act as fully compliant OAuth 2 authorization server."

"Tivoli Access Manager's proxy product (WebSEAL) is extremely fast."

"We have managed to automate the creation of all employees, and the company's clients and then assign the accounts/accesses according to business need."

"Since its birth it is an unbelievable stable product."

"The integration effort with the end application is quite straightforward and easy."

"IBM directory server offers the best roll-out experience."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] pros

"Security incidents have gone down because of the stronger authentication, and our IT team has saved a lot of time on access issues."

"The solution allows the user to search logs based on a specific time."

"There is a good return on investment because we achieve our onboarding, offboarding, auditing requirements, and MFA requirements in less time."

"OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is pretty good."

"I have seen fewer support tickets after implementing OneLogin, which have been reduced by 60 to 70 percent compared to the previous method."

"The directory integration and SCIM provisioning are probably the best features compared to competitors."

"OneLogin is still the market's most exemplary solution."

"Around 30 to 40 percent of time is saved since using OneLogin, and the error has been reduced because a single login manages all the applications, significantly cutting down on errors."

More OneLogin pros

Cons

"There were endless issues with stability in version 8.0.1."

"The self-service portal needs improvement."

"You must be skilled to use Tivoli Access Manager."

"The profiling element is incredibly robust, but also equally as complex, it requires an off-site course to be able to understand the context or the plethora of options available."

"Multi-factor authentication with social integration needs to improve."

"Installation and configuration. If you don’t know the requirements of the supporting components, it could be complicated to install and this has been improved in the later versions that are renamed to IBM Tivoli Security Access Manager."

"Redundant Policy servers had to be manually configured using LB."

"I would rate the technical support a 6/10."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] cons

"Based on my experience, improvements needed for OneLogin include better granular policy controls and more advanced analytics for authentication activity, which would be especially useful for larger enterprise environments."

"OneLogin has been a good experience, but there is a scope of improvement in every application, especially in the admin user interface and overall usability."

"However there have been times where reaching a technical support resource during US Business hours is difficult."

"However, the initial custom integration could be simplified, as it is somewhat complex."

"During the last three months, there's been a couple of pretty big outages that have affected my user base pretty heavily. I had pretty much a dead workforce for a day, which is pretty significant."

"There are a couple of areas for improvement in OneLogin. While it is strong overall, the key areas that could be worked on include the ease of configuration for advanced workflows, as setting up complex role-based policies or integration across different systems in the HealthTech market requires considerable technical effort."

"OneLogin could be improved by offering a more intuitive admin interface and simpler configuration for advanced features and integrations."

"OneLogin could be improved with simpler user management features, though the current interface is relatively straightforward to use."

More OneLogin cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	126
Midsize Enterprise	30
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

During implementation, there were not many features that I remember not using in practice. Mostly, there were certain APIs that we were experimenting with earlier but did not use, so we created cus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

My main use case for OneLogin is to enforce workforce identity, and we implemented this in Malaysia's biggest retail client, so all of their employees' applications can be securely accessed through...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

When I am working in OneLogin on a normal day or week, the first thing I typically do in the platform is handling SSO configurations, so I add applications and interact with application stakeholder...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Platform vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Idira Identity vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Competitors

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

June 2026

Download IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

June 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Overview

IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.

IBM

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc.

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Cisco and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best User Provisioning Software vendors, and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.