IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs OneLogin comparison

IBM and One Identity are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Additionally, 93% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Read 29 IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] reviews

93% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Read 44 OneLogin reviews

5,709 Views
2,797 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

OneLogin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and OneLogin are competing in the identity and access management sector. Although IBM Tivoli Access Manager offers competitive pricing, OneLogin's advanced features make it a superior product, justifying the higher cost.

Features: IBM Tivoli Access Manager provides robust authentication and access control, risk-based access, and SSO for enterprise settings. OneLogin features advanced single sign-on, comprehensive integration with third-party applications, and SmartFactor Authentication for adaptive security.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli Access Manager could improve by simplifying deployment, enhancing user interface, and expanding integration abilities. OneLogin should focus on expanding customization options, enhancing customer support for technical issues, and reducing the complexity of initial setup procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli Access Manager requires significant technical resources for setup, offering strong legacy system integration support. OneLogin stands out for its simple cloud-based deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring a swift implementation with minimal disruption.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli Access Manager offers competitive pricing favorable for stable environments. OneLogin, despite higher initial costs, provides a strong ROI with scalable solutions, lower maintenance expenses, and flexible pricing options suited to future-proofing business strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneLogin

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), User Provisioning Software (5th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (6th)

Featured Reviews

it_user711612

Senior Consultant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reverse proxy provides central control over authentication and authorization.

It is a single product that caters for all the business needs throughout the organization. It provides a seamless integration that in turn encourages most of the applications to use the SSO features Reverse proxy is the most valuable feature as it provides central control over authentication and…

Read full review

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Before the solution was implemented it took around 2-3 weeks to get all the necessary account information for a new employee in my organization, and since implementation this now only takes a few minutes."

"We have managed to automate the creation of all employees, and the company's clients and then assign the accounts/accesses according to business need."

"It is one of the best products in the present market in the area of access management."

"IBM directory server offers the best roll-out experience."

"Some of the valuable features are: Reverse proxy Protected object space Ease of integration Multiple and robust AuthN and AuthZ mechanisms built-in No single point of failure (SPOF)"

"It provided a secure and robust end to end security solution."

"Tivoli Access Manager (or IBM Security Access Manager) is a fully featured web authentication, sso and authorization product."

"Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] pros

"The best feature of OneLogin is the mapping feature, which stands out as the most beneficial, as the mapping works better in OneLogin, allowing me to sync users from Google Group to OneLogin role, which is crucial for role access for end users and new service requests."

"OneLogin's best features are the whole package, which includes the combination of the integration with Active Directory, user provisioning, and the graphical user interface."

"I trust that OneLogin actually values their customers and their ideas."

"The directory integration and SCIM provisioning are probably the best features compared to competitors."

"OneLogin is efficient."

"In my role, the most valuable features are two-factor authentication and self-service password reset. The most helpful feature for the institution as a whole is probably the single sign-on. As an IT director, I care about security and ease of use."

"It has made things easier to manage, as all users obtain the correct apps to deliver on their role without much admin intervention after onboarding."

"Since implementing OneLogin by One Identity, the biggest positive change I've noticed is how much smoother and faster my workday feels."

More OneLogin pros

Cons

"Older TAM versions are not compatible for connecting to a DB."

"There is Java process that hangs in WebSphere almost every month."

"Looking at their roadmap, they have a broad grasp of the security features which the industry needs."

"There were endless issues with stability in version 8.0.1."

"The TAMeB policy server is not scalable."

"Administration of the product can be improved a lot."

"The self-service portal needs improvement."

"I have not tested the stability yet."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] cons

"Currently, I'm much more focused on Okta, as the solution hasn't really met our requirements."

"In terms of managing the users on a large scale, it would be easier if they had some kind of user management portal."

"OneLogin should provide better documentation on configuring policies and roles and ensure that customer support is available 24/7 with experienced staff to improve the complexity of the deployment process."

"I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability."

"I believe the audit trail could be improved, and more solution integrators need to be established."

"OneLogin could be improved with simpler user management features, though the current interface is relatively straightforward to use."

"More off-hour support."

"Performance is lacking sometimes and having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."

More OneLogin cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Marketing Services Firm

18%

Performing Arts

12%

Media Company

University

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

The areas of OneLogin that have room for improvement include that AI is not for me. There are tools where AI does not belong, in my opinion, and this is one of them. I don't see any benefits of hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

OneLogin's use case in my organization is for the entire infrastructure because it was very outdated, not secure, and it was built Windows heavy despite us being a Mac environment. I decided to go ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

The advice I would give others looking to implement OneLogin is that there are a lot of tools out there. If this is something where the basic package fits for people or they need all those extra be...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

SAP Identity Management vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Competitors

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

March 2026

Download IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

March 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Overview

IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.

IBM

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc.

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Cisco and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best User Provisioning Software vendors, and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.