IBM Spectrum Accelerate vs Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Spectrum Accelerate and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ease of use is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's very user-friendly.""The most valuable feature is the robustness, which is typical of IBM because their software generally just works."

More IBM Spectrum Accelerate Pros →

"The most valuable feature are the caching capabilities using the storage class memory.""Its technical support is excellent.""It's mainly about the storage expansion, like in hyper-converged solutions.""The flash ability, in terms of tiering and caching, is amazing""The performance, reliability, and affordability has been most valuable.""The most valuable feature is that there is no single point of failure."

More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Pros →

Cons
"he interface is not user-friendly so the ease of use could be improved.""The reporting mechanisms need improvement."

More IBM Spectrum Accelerate Cons →

"More optimization could be done in terms of mirroring.""Documentation management could be improved""The management tool within this solution could be improved. We would also like to be able to access services like Azure when using this solution.""It is difficult to get a hardware compatibility certification for the solution.""It is scalable, but only beyond two nodes. If I go for two nodes it's not scalable. I need to build a complete cluster from the beginning if I'm going for two nodes.""I think the online documentation needs a lot of work and so do the sizing tools."

More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For a database, on a yearly basis, we pay approximately $3,500 for licensing fees. The solution is sold as a subscription on a yearly basis so there are no other ancillary costs."
  • "If you are cost-sensitive then this solution is not for you."
  • More IBM Spectrum Accelerate Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "With the data center licensing and everything that is connected to that, this solution is relatively costly."
  • "Cost-wise the product is one of the more affordable within the category of products."
  • More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We found VMware’s vSAN was easy to set up, configure, and manage compared to other solutions we considered. It is best suited for small- to medium-sized organizations. It is easy to create load… more »
    Top Answer:It is difficult to get a hardware compatibility certification for the solution. In comparison, the process is easy for VMware and VSAN.
    Ranking
    Views
    245
    Comparisons
    178
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,063
    Comparisons
    1,377
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    241
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM XIV
    MS Storage Spaces Direct
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Spectrum Accelerate is a software-defined block storage solution designed for rapid deployment across heterogeneous infrastructure for hybrid cloud and delivering consistent service levels to a dynamic workload mix. It is based on proven grid-architecture, enterprise-scale IBM XIV technology. IBM Spectrum Accelerate can be deployed, including as hyper-converged infrastructure, on any x86 server, on pre-installed third-party appliances or on public cloud infrastructure, and is available as a service on IBM Cloud infrastructure.

    Storage Spaces Direct uses industry-standard servers with local-attached drives to create highly available, highly scalable software-defined storage at a fraction of the cost of traditional SAN or NAS arrays. Its converged or hyper-converged architecture radically simplifies procurement and deployment, while features like caching, storage tiers, and erasure coding, together with the latest hardware innovation like RDMA networking and NVMe drives, deliver unrivaled efficiency and performance.

    Sample Customers
    Silverpop
    Acuutech, Quest Technology Management, Bradley, Mead & Hunt
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Spectrum Accelerate is ranked 22nd in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is ranked 9th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 7 reviews. IBM Spectrum Accelerate is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Accelerate writes "A robust solution with good performance and support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct writes "Stable solution with an easy initial setup process". IBM Spectrum Accelerate is most compared with IBM Spectrum Scale, whereas Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is most compared with VMware vSAN, StarWind Virtual SAN, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) and DataCore SANsymphony.

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors and best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.