IBM Rational Test Workbench vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #21, while Oracle is ranked #15. IBM holds a 0.7% mindshare in PTT, compared to Oracle’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

124 Views
59 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

355 Views
202 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 5, 2025

IBM Rational Test Workbench and Oracle Application Testing Suite compete in the software testing domain. Oracle Application Testing Suite has an edge due to its comprehensive features despite potentially higher costs.

Features: IBM Rational Test Workbench supports robust test automation for complex applications, facilitates performance testing across platforms, and integrates well with other IBM tools. Oracle Application Testing Suite excels in integrated test automation, offers specialized environments for Oracle E-Business Suite and Siebel, and integrates deeply with the Oracle ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Test Workbench could enhance its support for third-party tool integration and simplify automation script maintenance. Its user interface might benefit from modernization. Oracle Application Testing Suite may improve by offering more flexible pricing models, reducing deployment complexity, and enhancing non-Oracle system support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Test Workbench features a moderately flexible deployment model, emphasizing integration with IBM solutions and straightforward documentation. Oracle Application Testing Suite can be more complex to deploy but offers dedicated support and training specifically for Oracle environments, providing an edge in customer service through its tailored assistance.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Test Workbench is more cost-effective upfront with lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious buyers for immediate ROI. Oracle Application Testing Suite, while having a higher setup cost, provides extensive features and integration capabilities which lead to long-term benefits and ROI, especially for businesses heavily invested in Oracle products.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (15th), Test Automation Tools (39th)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (25th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Good integration with other tools, stable, scales easily

There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation. This includes the workbench as well as the other tools. In the future, I would like to see the other types of tests supported, that are not already covered in the DevOps approach. This would include, for example, penetration testing.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"The solution is scalable."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"The function test feature is valuable."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

ReadyAPI Test vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 35% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 32% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 32% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 33% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

May 2025

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

May 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

OATS

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

June 2025

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.