No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM Open Liberty vs Spring MVC comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
2.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Application Server (7th)
Spring MVC
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Java Frameworks (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM Open Liberty and Spring MVC aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Open Liberty is designed for Application Server and holds a mindshare of 4.7%.
Spring MVC, on the other hand, focuses on Java Frameworks, holds 6.6% mindshare, up 3.8% since last year.
Application Server Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Open Liberty4.7%
Tomcat12.4%
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)11.0%
Other71.9%
Application Server
Java Frameworks Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Spring MVC6.6%
Spring Boot29.2%
Jakarta EE17.0%
Other47.2%
Java Frameworks
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA - PeerSpot reviewer
Partner at SouJava
Has enabled flexible deployment of modular services with high availability and smooth dynamic updates
The best features of IBM Open Liberty are the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, along with fault tolerance and high availability. It's easy to use and deploy new features. The profile is easy to configure and set up features. For example, using fault tolerance from MicroProfile or using servlets or JAX-RS allows for easy configuration and creation of modular applications. The configuration is modular. The main point for us in this project was high availability, high performance, and the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. We utilized the modular architecture of IBM Open Liberty by creating different microservices using different environments. We created different configurations for different services using the configuration of IBM Open Liberty. This was very beneficial. We created different environments only by changing the configuration, depending on the functionality we needed. It was good and very flexible for us. I used the dynamic updates feature of IBM Open Liberty and different configurations in different services and servers, based on the functionality we provided for our clients. The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important. The high availability is guaranteed by the architecture of IBM Open Liberty, Java, and MicroProfile. The architecture guaranteed high availability, and the flexibility comes from being able to configure needed features. There's no need to load all WebSphere or functionalities in all environments. I can configure it and create a more highly available and scalable process. I implemented monitoring tools for IBM Open Liberty using Grafana and OpenTracing using the functionalities from MicroProfile and IBM Open Liberty. The monitoring tools helped with managing system performance.
Arkabrata  Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Java developer at Marlabs Inc.
A scalable tool with great auto-configuration capabilities
The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities. A user need not configure anything in the product as it offers configuration files to set profiling and guide users with what they need to connect for development, staging, or production. The auto-configuration is one of the best components of the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."
"The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important."
"The most valuable features of Spring MVC are the modules, such as Spring Admin. All the Spring solutions work well together and are simple to maintain, such as the load balancing on the client side."
"The most valuable feature of Spring MVC is the configuration, such as WAF."
"The solution is open-source and free to use."
"It provides the best documentation for technical support."
"We have found this to be a stable solution, and have not experienced any performance issues during our time using it."
"We appreciate that this product is really easy to integrate with third-party UI services."
"The solution is stable and reliable, and developing web applications is quite easy there."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
 

Cons

"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."
"To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial."
"The cost is quite high."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward. It's not very easy to accomplish a deployment."
"Spring MVC could improve the integration with DevOps and other applications."
"Spring IDE needs some work and improvement. We have faced many issues when adding third-party Eclipse plugins."
"I saw some error messages coming up when they were getting problems actually viewing all the reports."
"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings."
"I have recently had problems with the changes that were made using Spring Security."
"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions. As such, it would be nice if Spring were to improve support for upgrading to newer versions, especially for legacy applications."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."
"It is an open-source solution."
"Spring MVC is open source and free."
"The solution is free."
"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."
"We are using the open-source version of the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
896,298 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
44%
Computer Software Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Open Liberty?
To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial. Having more integration with Kafka, Mongo, and middleware systems that ...
What is your primary use case for Open Liberty?
I used IBM Open Liberty for an application for financial services using IBM Open Liberty and MicroProfile to process data for financial services work.
What advice do you have for others considering Open Liberty?
I used IBM Open Liberty in the past in a project, but today I'm not using it anymore. I had a good experience working with it in a financial services company. This was very beneficial. My review ra...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Spring by Pivotal, Spring, Spring Framework
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
EMC, Aridhia, CoreLogic, CenturyLink, Humana, Purdue University, Tampon Run, ArtsPool, Charity Water, Center for ReSource Conservation, Manos Teatrales
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: May 2026.
896,298 professionals have used our research since 2012.