Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Open Liberty vs Spring MVC comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Server (8th)
Spring MVC
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Java Frameworks (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM Open Liberty and Spring MVC aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Open Liberty is designed for Application Server and holds a mindshare of 1.2%.
Spring MVC, on the other hand, focuses on Java Frameworks, holds 3.4% mindshare, up 3.2% since last year.
Application Server
Java Frameworks
 

Featured Reviews

FV
Scalable solution with efficient monitoring features
We use the solution to develop microservices for financial organizations The solution has the best monitoring features. The solution's feature for distributed transaction management could be better. Also, its login feature needs improvement as well. The solution is much more stable compared to…
Arkabrata  Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable tool with great auto-configuration capabilities
The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities. A user need not configure anything in the product as it offers configuration files to set profiling and guide users with what they need to connect for development, staging, or production. The auto-configuration is one of the best components of the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."
"The most valuable features of Spring MVC are the modules, such as Spring Admin. All the Spring solutions work well together and are simple to maintain, such as the load balancing on the client side."
"When we shifted from our legacy frameworks to the Spring framework, we discovered that Spring definitely made our development easier. One good example is that there is a lot of boiler plate code available that you don't have to write from scratch, making the development of web applications a much simpler process."
"The most valuable feature of Spring MVC is the configuration, such as WAF."
"The interface is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"It provides the best documentation for technical support."
"Spring MVC is fast and reliable."
"We appreciate that this product is really easy to integrate with third-party UI services."
"We have found Spring is easy to use and learn."
 

Cons

"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."
"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions. As such, it would be nice if Spring were to improve support for upgrading to newer versions, especially for legacy applications."
"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings."
"We would like the deployment of this solution to be easier as, at present, it is quite complicated."
"The solution could be simplified quite a bit. It's unnecessarily complicated in some areas."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"It could provide faster performance."
"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."
"I have recently had problems with the changes that were made using Spring Security."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."
"The solution is free."
"It is an open-source solution."
"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."
"It is an affordable solution."
"We are using the open-source version of the solution."
"Spring MVC is open source and free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
52%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Insurance Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
21%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Performing Arts
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution do you prefer: Spring Boot or Open Liberty?
Sometimes, Open Liberty is preferred over Spring Boot because Open Liberty is lightweight, scalable, and secure. It is also a good choice for microservices because it supports a wide range of deplo...
What do you like most about Open Liberty?
It is a stable solution compared to other vendors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Open Liberty?
The solution is expensive but worth the investment as it has integration capabilities to manage the overall components. However, it is less costly compared to Spring Boot.
What do you like most about Spring MVC?
The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities.
What needs improvement with Spring MVC?
In the future, I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Spring by Pivotal, Spring, Spring Framework
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
EMC, Aridhia, CoreLogic, CenturyLink, Humana, Purdue University, Tampon Run, ArtsPool, Charity Water, Center for ReSource Conservation, Manos Teatrales
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Server. Updated: July 2025.
862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.