Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
IBM Integration Bus enhances ROI through effective integration, long-term value, cost savings, and sustained market readiness.
Sentiment score
6.2
Mule ESB ROI is challenging to calculate but favorable with effective design, despite high licensing costs affecting returns.
Sentiment score
7.2
Organizations benefit from SEEBURGER Suite's efficiency and automation, achieving cost savings and reduced manual tasks, boosting ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
IBM Integration Bus' customer service is generally praised but has issues with costs, response time, and varying support quality.
Sentiment score
6.6
Mule ESB support is praised for expertise, but response times vary with some users needing more comprehensive solutions.
Sentiment score
7.3
SEEBURGER's support is responsive with quick high-severity responses, though language barriers and customization needs can occasionally delay assistance.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
IBM Integration Bus offers scalable, efficient integration for enterprise applications, with strong adaptability and performance in high-volume environments.
Sentiment score
7.6
Mule ESB ensures high scalability, suitable for enterprises, enabling seamless cloud deployment and accommodating extensive user growth effectively.
Sentiment score
7.4
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is scalable, flexible for cloud/on-premises use, and adaptable for increased capacities and partner integrations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
IBM Integration Bus is reliable and stable, rated highly by users, despite occasional Oracle connectivity and latency issues.
Sentiment score
7.2
Mule ESB is generally stable, especially in newer versions, but issues exist with large files and resource demands.
Sentiment score
8.0
SEEBURGER Suite is stable and reliable, with proper setup ensuring performance amid rare, non-software-related issues and regular updates.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a very stable product, and I haven't noticed any significant drawbacks.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Integration Bus needs interface, performance, and cloud improvements, plus enhanced support, flexibility, resources, and better pricing.
Mule ESB requires better documentation, stable releases, improved connectors, coding features, and performance enhancements, despite high memory and licensing costs.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite struggles with interface, monitoring, and data handling, needing enhancements in integration, support, and customization.
Acquiring training documents on a public domain for SEEBURGER is challenging.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Integration Bus pricing is competitive yet costly, varying by license, making it viable for larger enterprises.
Mule ESB is costly for SMEs despite a free version, due to licenses and additional fees for certain features.
SEEBURGER's pricing is mid-tier, flexible, yet complex, with scalability options and negotiable prices for substantial benefits.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Integration Bus offers excellent protocol support, performance, scalability, and integration capabilities with systems like SAP and Oracle.
Mule ESB excels in flexibility, integration, user-friendly design, and scalability, featuring diverse deployment and robust support.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite offers seamless EDI automation, platform independence, and user-friendly, scalable integration with SAP and complex protocols.
It comes pre-loaded with solutions, meaning it is ready to use without requiring significant development.
 

Mindshare comparison

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

Ashraf Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewer
Helpful for complex integrations because it has tools and functionality to integrate with other systems
Everything needs to be improved. As far as integration and the cloud are concerned, things are moving to the cloud side. When you use Kubernetes and similar technologies, IBM Integration Bus doesn't greatly facilitate these environments. Maybe I don't know enough about that, but I feel that when it comes to the DevOps environment, the tool needs to be deployed on production in a way that's just like pods. Cloud integration needs to be more facilitated with the DevOps environment. This IBM technology needs to adapt because in the recent world, in the real world, we see that everything is just a cloud pod. Whenever you need to scale anything, you just put some cloud and pod and improve it, make any server and deploy it. But in IBM Integration Bus, there is a problem because we can't do this as easily. In short, IBM needs to more emphasize or more integrate with the cloud environments as well, similar to DevOps. There are limitations in IBM Integration Bus when it comes to DevOps.
PurbayanSaha - PeerSpot reviewer
Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs
There's room for improvement in multi-file transfer functionality. It's not convenient when using MuleSoft, and it should have better capability for handling large amounts of data. For example, applications like GoAnywhere can handle huge chunks of data, so the tool should also have something to facilitate that aspect of integration.
VARUNKUMAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Great end-to-end integration, data mapping, and communication protocols
At this moment, everything is working fine. When we are talking to them, when we are trying to bring all this mapping in-house, right now, SEEBURGER is doing everything for us. However, when we are thinking of going onto the cloud, so they are not using any of AWS or Azure which are more stable. They have their own private cloud. That's the reason we did not go ahead with managing everything by ourselves or moving into the cloud. They said that they're going to be doing it within the next two years, having access to Azure and AWS. That would be something we would like to see.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using Mu...
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was t...
What do you like most about IBM Integration Bus?
The message queue, like, message queue connectors. Then they have a built in connectors for most of the systems, like...
What do you like most about Mule ESB?
The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mule ESB?
Pricing is higher compared to other solutions, and the licensing costs are high.
What needs improvement with Mule ESB?
In India, particularly in the banking sector, clients do not prefer cloud solutions due to regulatory and compliance ...
What do you like most about SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a highly stable solution that offers rich features for our B2B integration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
I've heard that the solution is cheaper when compared to other products in the market.
What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
Overall, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a robust and standard product. However, providing more training mate...
 

Also Known As

IBM WebSphere ESB
No data available
SEEBURGER BIS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Salesbox, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Road Buddy, Swiss Federal Railways, Electricity Supply Board, The Hartree Centre, ESB Networks
Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: April 2025.
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.