IBM InfoSphere Optim vs Toad for Oracle comparison

IBM and Quest Software are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.0, while Quest Software is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.3. IBM holds a 2.2% mindshare in DDM, compared to Quest Software’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Read 4 IBM InfoSphere Optim reviews

726 Views
661 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Toad for Oracle

Read 17 Toad for Oracle reviews

1,222 Views
1,198 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Toad for Oracle

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM InfoSphere Optim and Toad for Oracle compete in database management and optimization. Toad for Oracle seems to have the upper hand with its feature-set versatility and ease of deployment.

Features: IBM InfoSphere Optim is known for data archiving, application retirement, and data privacy, focusing on lifecycle management and compliance. Toad for Oracle is noted for database development, query building, and real-time insights aiming at development and optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM InfoSphere Optim involves a complex deployment with strong customer support. Toad for Oracle offers a simple installation, intuitive interface, and effective support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM InfoSphere Optim has higher initial setup costs, focusing on data governance and compliance ROI. Toad for Oracle is more cost-effective, emphasizing productivity and reduced manual errors.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Toad for Oracle Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Toad for Oracle

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Ranking in Database Development and Management

16th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Toad for Oracle

Ranking in Database Development and Management

7th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Optim is 2.2%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Toad for Oracle is 2.8%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Toad for Oracle	2.8%
IBM InfoSphere Optim	2.2%
Other	95.0%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

Kenneth Estanislao

Solutions Designer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Backups become efficient while cost concerns remain

I am still working with IBM and we are transitioning to other tools rather than using IBM InfoSphere Optim. We use other tools, but I cannot recall the name because I am not the one currently handling it. It has transitioned to other architects. For IBM InfoSphere Optim, we are still currently using it, but we have transitioned to the newer version, the latest one with support for AWS S3. I cannot identify a main competitor for IBM InfoSphere Optim because we have transitioned to other architects, and they are the ones looking for other tools. The last comparison I did was almost 4 years ago. I am not using any AI technology with IBM InfoSphere Optim. I rate IBM InfoSphere Optim a seven out of ten. The tool is good, but the price is not favorable as it is the most expensive part. I can recommend IBM InfoSphere Optim for enterprises.

Read full review

Mark Stocks

Vice President, Director Enterprise Architecture at JE Dunn Construction

Uses trusted data to support financial forecasting and automate complex calculations through daily development workflows

The best features Toad for Oracle offers are the ability to access the database objects and see them in a very simplified manner. The simplified view helps me in my work as it makes troubleshooting easier. Toad for Oracle has positively impacted our organization because our financial forecasting data set is trusted throughout the company because of the ability for us to debug and analyze the data with Toad for Oracle. This trust in the data set has affected business decisions and efficiency by creating a completely separate data department because of the value that we saw with our data because of how we were able to organize and extract data from Oracle with Toad for Oracle.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."

"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize."

"The compression feature is valuable because it achieves around 80% compression."

"The tool evaluates non-optimized queries and generates the queries in a way that is more optimal - in addition to giving us some good practices for code development."

"The best product for working with Oracle databases for support, checking and loading data."

"I haven't seen any issues with scalability. We have about 1000 people on our IT team who use the solution."

"Toad for Oracle has proven to be better than other tools since we have never experienced any crashes."

"I like that it's very flexible and helpful in query accuracy, analysis, and data visualization. I also like the move facilities available in Toad for Oracle. Overall, I think it's a fantastic product for analyzing SQL queries and managing all kinds of queries."

"The schema browser is the most valuable feature. The way it presents the objects in our database."

"Toad has a lot of features that are very useful, fast, and well developed."

"Toad for Oracle has positively impacted our organization because our financial forecasting data set is trusted throughout the company because of the ability for us to debug and analyze the data with Toad for Oracle."

More Toad for Oracle pros

Cons

"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."

"The potential room for improvement for IBM InfoSphere Optim is usually its cost, as it is too expensive."

"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."

"It would be beneficial if Toad for Oracle could incorporate OEM features, as having monitoring capabilities in the same interface would simplify workload and management tasks."

"In future releases, the product can be more intuitive. It has to be lighter than what it is because sometimes it is not responding quickly. If I do some features at the same time, it's not supporting. I have to wait sometimes to get the action. It's dependent on the resources of the workstation, but it has to be improved in this area. The faster processing is needed."

"Toad for Oracle does not have a particular resolution within the application."

"There could be a tool for automated SQL query functioning."

"Sometimes it works in some areas, but in others, it doesn't. Like when you copy, you find that it's blank and doesn't copy anything. So, there are some objects that do copy, and sometimes they don't."

"Scalability falls short for my organization because from a scalability perspective, the software sometimes seems bloated when installing it on a new machine, and it would be nice if we could reduce the amount of features we are actually installing and keep it streamlined for our current needs."

"Query optimization is still very resource-intensive."

"Improvement wise, for the user it should show the minimum features on the screen and not all the features. Toad has a lot of features, but most users will use only 5 or 10 based on their role. Nobody needs all the features, and they should provide the option to choose only the required features. Only minimum requirements should be enabled by default. When all the features are shown, the performance is not good; it loads slowly and has hundreds of popups and unnecessary questions."

More Toad for Oracle cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have."

"I would rate it six, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"There are paid and free-for-use versions of the product."

"In my opinion, this solution is a little expensive, but I understand that good programs cost more money."

"The professional edition is about $1,000 AUD ($700 USD) and the developer version is about twice that much."

"My advice is to try to use the three-year maintenance agreement if possible."

"The pricing is okay, it's reasonable."

"Toad for Oracle has a relatively high cost compared to other similar tools."

"The product's pricing is just right because if it were slightly higher, it would not have been as widely adopted as it currently is in our organization."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Retailer

Outsourcing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Optim?

The potential room for improvement for IBM InfoSphere Optim is usually its cost, as it is too expensive. Currently, there are no issues with IBM InfoSphere Optim; the only problem is the cost, whic...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Optim?

My current use case for IBM InfoSphere Optim is just for doing backups. We are using IBM InfoSphere Optim specifically for backup purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM InfoSphere Optim?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad for Oracle?

The licensing cost for Toad for Oracle is relatively high, with their license and DPA suite totaling around five thousand dollars.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad for Oracle?

Toad for Oracle can be improved by working with Microsoft Fabric.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Toad for Oracle?

My main use case for Toad for Oracle is accessing data in Oracle and building PL/SQL database objects, packages, procedures, and functions. A quick specific example of how I use Toad for Oracle in ...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC AMI DevX vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 25% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 17% of the time

Solix Enterprise Data Management vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 16% of the time

Archon Data Store vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 11% of the time

SAP Replication Server vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Competitors

DbVisualizer vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 13% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 13% of the time

Toad Edge vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 12% of the time

Toad Data Modeler vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 11% of the time

Foglight for Databases vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 10% of the time

More Toad for Oracle Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

December 2025

Download IBM InfoSphere Optim product report

Buyer's Guide

Toad for Oracle

January 2026

Download Toad for Oracle product report

Also Known As

IBM Optim, Optim

No data available

Overview

IBM Optim solutions manage data from requirements to retirement. They boost performance, empower collaboration, and improve governance across applications, databases and platforms. By managing data properly over its lifetime, organisations are better equipped to support business goals with less risk.

IBM

With Toad for Oracle, you'll reduce costs and risks by easily ensuring the health and performance of your Oracle Cloud Platform and on-premises databases. ... On the operations side, you can automate administration tasks and proactively manage your databases while embracing performance optimization and risk mitigation.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Durham Police Department, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Continental, KCE Electronics Public Company Limited, The University of Adelaide, Migros Zurich, COPROB

intel, ebay, uber, mars, microsoft

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Toad for Oracle

December 2025

Free Report: IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Toad for Oracle

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Toad for Oracle and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Toad for Oracle report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.