Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM FlashSystem vs NetApp V-Series [EOL] comparison

IBM and NetApp are both solutions in the NAS category. Additionally, 91% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.
IBM FlashSystem
Read 111 IBM FlashSystem reviews
  • 3,216 Views
  • 750 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM FlashSystem and NetApp V-Series [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hitachi Vantara and others in NAS.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NAS Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NAS
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM FlashSystem
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
111
Ranking in other categories
NAS (5th), Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (13th)
NetApp V-Series [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

OmarIsmail1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers high performance and dependable support for fast storage needs
The most valuable feature of IBM FlashSystem ( /products/ibm-flashsystem-reviews ) is its robust back code. When integrated properly into the environment and configured according to the guidelines, it provides a very solid infrastructure that does the job on demand. Additionally, IBM FlashSystem offers competitive pricing and reliable performance. The hardware is dependable, ensuring that it functions effectively when the setup is done correctly.
Read full review
it_user487899 - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible, allowing us to provide NAS and SAN solutions with the same hardware
According to my experience, for certain HPC environments, we encounter certain Memory/CPU limitations when we have a large number of IOPS. This is why, in order to support such loads, several cabs are required in parallel, complicating the configuration and administration. Another handicap is the management of the LACP that, when we are talking about environments with less than 20 calculation nodes, may not balance correctly despite setting the RR option.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?
It is simple to make an update.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?
Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?
The deduplication technology in IBM FlashSystem needs significant improvement. Other vendors like NetApp ( /products/netapp-41749-reviews ) offer better deduplication technology, which is noticeabl...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 22% of the time
HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 9% of the time
Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 8% of the time
Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 8% of the time
NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 7% of the time
More IBM FlashSystem Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM FlashSystem
June 2025
IBM FlashSystem reportDownload IBM FlashSystem product report
Buyer's Guide
Backup and Recovery
June 2025
NetApp V-Series [EOL] reportDownload NetApp V-Series [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

IBM Storwize
No data available
 

Overview

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM
NetApp V-Series storage virtualization controllers provide leading data protection, data management, and storage efficiency for your existing EMC, HDS, HP, IBM, Fujitsu, and NetApp E-Series storage arrays. Reclaim 35% or more capacity and reduce what you must spend for new disk drives to handle data growth by using NetApp storage efficiency features such as deduplication, thin provisioning, and compression. Optimize your workload performance with our broad flash portfolio.
NetApp
 

Sample Customers

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH
City of Houston, Health Choice Network, SVC Bank, Plex Systems, Larsen & Toubro, IWD, JCVI
Buyer's Guide
NAS
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hitachi Vantara and others in NAS. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best NAS vendors and best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.