IBM Disaster Recovery Services vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Disaster Recovery Services and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution works well for very large organizations. It can scale quite well.""Disaster Recovery Services is stable."

More IBM Disaster Recovery Services Pros →

"It is a very secure and scalable solution, and their support is also outstanding.""Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click. That is extremely useful.""We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution.""The solution is stable.""It offers synchronous data replication, allowing us to sync our recovery data every hour and efficiently send applications to remote sites.""The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use."

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pros →

Cons
"The infrastructure level of IBM's recovery systems could be improved.""Disaster Recovery Services could provide better value for money."

More IBM Disaster Recovery Services Cons →

"They need better reporting on the environment.""I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers.""The product is more costly than other platforms. The price could be better.""The solution needs improvement in cost.""For moving the data for DR, we are using Megaport. We are using a Megaport link between the data centers, so we have a third party for the site-to-site connectivity between the data centers. If such connectivity is available from the Nutanix side, it would be helpful for us.""The pricing could be better."

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of the solution is based on the scale of the project or business. It's based on the server amount and the amount of data being stored. For our client, based on the amount of data they have, it may be around $20,000 USD. It could get much more expensive on the customer side."
  • "Disaster Recovery Services is expensive."
  • More IBM Disaster Recovery Services Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Besides the license, there are additional costs with the network connection. The customer may want a direct connection between the two data centers and that has an extra cost."
  • "I always want it to be cheaper."
  • "One-time costs may initially seem high, but they reflect the quality of the service received."
  • "It is a little bit cheaper than the other products in the market. It is affordable."
  • More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It offers synchronous data replication, allowing us to sync our recovery data every hour and efficiently send applications to remote sites.
    Top Answer:Nutanix may be perceived as expensive compared to local vendors. Additionally, one-time costs may initially seem high, but they reflect the quality of the service received.
    Top Answer:The product is more costly than other platforms. The price could be better. In the next release, it would be beneficial to include a feature that automates the creation of services. We often have to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    206
    Comparisons
    149
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    137
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    341
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    834
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Nutanix Xi Leap
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Resiliency Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) can provide end-to-end integrated services using private, public and/or hybrid cloud. IBM Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) provides continuous replication of critical applications, infrastructure, data and systems to the cloud so users can recover within minutes of an IT outage. Intelligent Orchestration offers a unified DR management approach that delivers real-time readiness validation.
    Nutanix Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) is a fully managed DR service that eliminates the need for a dedicated DR site, minimizes data loss and downtime, and helps organizations meet RTO/RPO SLAs confidently.
    Sample Customers
    i-Virtualize, QD, Continuum Managed Services LLC, Royal Arctic Line, Department of Science and Technology of the Republic of the Philippines, Idwala Industrial Holdings Limited, A-Plant c.a.r.u.s. Information Technology GmbH Hannover, eASPNet Taiwan Inc., Mobile Mini Inc., TriDatum Solutions Inc., M7 Managed Services Ltd., Hospital de la Concepci‹n
    JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    Disaster Recovery as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Disaster Recovery Services is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 2 reviews while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is ranked 3rd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 6 reviews. IBM Disaster Recovery Services is rated 8.0, while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Disaster Recovery Services writes "Quite stable with good scalability for large organizations but the recovery system infrastructure could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service writes "Affordable, highly scalable, and outstanding support". IBM Disaster Recovery Services is most compared with Precisely Assure MIMIX, Sungard Disaster Recovery Services and Azure Site Recovery, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is most compared with Zerto, VMware SRM, Azure Site Recovery, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and Veeam Backup & Replication.

    See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.