We performed a comparison between IBM Data Governance and Information Builders Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."IBM Data Governance improved data analytics operations. During a company merger, we used IBM Data Governance to understand and bridge sample data between systems."
"It has an intuitive data quality engine that allows you to modify data, and apply rules to standardize it, and it's an excellent initial stage."
"One area with room for improvement would be the ability to generate detailed quality reports. Some Python libraries provide quality scores and reports—having that capability within IBM Data Governance would be beneficial."
"The on-premise features are undeniably robust, but having equally powerful capabilities in the cloud would be a significant enhancement."
IBM Data Governance is ranked 29th in Data Governance with 1 review while Information Builders Data Governance is ranked 26th in Data Governance with 1 review. IBM Data Governance is rated 8.0, while Information Builders Data Governance is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Data Governance writes "Provides a single interface to monitor and navigate data quality metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Information Builders Data Governance writes "Balancing robust scalability with cloud features enhancements for streamlined operation". IBM Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Collibra Governance and Informatica Axon, whereas Information Builders Data Governance is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.