We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Data and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Virtualization solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."DataStage allows me to connect to different data sources."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Cloud Pak for Data is the Modeler flows. The ability to develop models using a graphical approach and the capability to connect to various sources, as well as the data virtualization capabilities, allow me to easily access and utilize data that is dispersed across different sources."
"One of Cloud Pak's best features is the Watson Knowledge Catalog, which helps you implement data governance."
"You can model the data there, connect the data models with the business processes and create data lineage processes."
"The most valuable features of IBM Cloud Pak for Data are the Watson Studio, where we can initiate more groups and write code. Additionally, Watson Machine Learning is available with many other services, such as APIs which you can plug the machine learning models."
"Cloud Pak's most valuable features are IBM MQ, IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, and ISPF."
"It is a scalable solution, and we have had no issues with its scalability in our company. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."
"What I found most helpful in IBM Cloud Pak for Data is containerization, which means it's easy to shift and leave in terms of moving to other clouds. That's an advantage of IBM Cloud Pak for Data."
"The functionality is of the solution is very good."
"SAP HANA is a stable solution."
"Its in-memory capabilities are good, which is why many companies still use it."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the interaction it provides with external suppliers and clients."
"The solution operates well."
"One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory."
"We've had good experiences with technical support."
"Eases management of databases."
"The technical support could be a little better."
"The solution could have more connectors."
"The tool depends on the control plane, an OpenShift container platform utilized as an orchestration layer...So, we have communicated this issue to IBM and asked if it is feasible to adapt the solution to work on a Kubernetes platform that we support."
"The product must improve its performance."
"The solution's user experience is an area that has room for improvement."
"The product is trying to be more maturity in terms of connectors. That, I believe, is an area where Cloud Pak can improve."
"The interface could improve because sometimes it becomes slow. Sometimes there is a delay between clicks when using the software, which can make the development process slow. It can take a few seconds to complete one action, and then a few more seconds to do the next one."
"One challenge I'm facing with IBM Cloud Pak for Data is native features have been decommissioned, such as XML input and output. Too many changes have been made, and my company has around one hundred thousand mappings, so my team has been putting more effort into alternative ways to do things. Another area for improvement in IBM Cloud Pak for Data is that it's more complicated to shift from on-premise to the cloud. Other vendors provide secure agents that easily connect with your existing setup. Still, with IBM Cloud Pak for Data, you have to perform connection migration steps, upgrade to the latest version, etc., which makes it more complicated, especially as my company has XML-based mappings. Still, the XML input and output capabilities of IBM Cloud Pak for Data have been discontinued, so I'd like IBM to bring that back."
"HANA could be improved by adding analytics and development models in the institution."
"The performance and integration with other products are areas in need of improvement."
"Uses a large amount of RAM and is costly."
"If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great."
"The solution is very expensive for us."
"The SAP ERP processes are quite complex and it can be challenging."
"The SAP HANA interface has room for improvement because it takes more work to manage than the Microsoft SQL Server interface."
"Needs graphical programming without coding."
IBM Cloud Pak for Data is ranked 3rd in Data Virtualization with 11 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 2nd in Data Virtualization with 79 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Data is rated 8.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Data writes "A scalable data analytics and digital transformation tool that provides useful features and integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". IBM Cloud Pak for Data is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Azure Data Factory, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Palantir Foundry and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL and IBM Db2 Database. See our IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Data Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Data Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
