We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator and webMethods Trading Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners."
"The best feature is that many companies use the solution so there is a lot of peer support."
"The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility."
"I find the codeless communications, SFTP or FTP, valuable."
"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."
"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."
"It can scale horizontally as well as vertically as a cluster."
"Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization."
"With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively."
"The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with."
"The one thing that is lacking is easy visibility. It's hard to provide business users with a view into the statuses of their transactions."
"The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough."
"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly."
"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."
"There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."
"The solution should include REST API calls."
IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews while webMethods Trading Networks is ranked 15th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews. IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0, while webMethods Trading Networks is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Trading Networks writes "Beneficial for external interactions, integrates well, and great support". IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SAP Process Orchestration, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and Cleo Integration Cloud Platform, whereas webMethods Trading Networks is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services. See our IBM B2B Integrator vs. webMethods Trading Networks report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
