We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator and Informatica Cloud API and App Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."B2B Integrator is multi-platform, so it can be integrated with Windows, Unix, or whatever, and it can work with almost all programming languages. It can also transfer a lot of data in a short time. For instance, a system I recently implemented exchanges about 20 million files a day."
"The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility."
"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle."
"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution."
"It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners."
"Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"The interface is really good."
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."
"The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough."
"The reporting features could be better. right now, they are lacking a bit."
"Map translator needs more enhancements."
"The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with."
"The one thing that is lacking is easy visibility. It's hard to provide business users with a view into the statuses of their transactions."
"They do not have a solid partner ecosystem, and they do not have a clear roadmap for down the line; they're missing that clear roadmap."
"API-Fication required, and there should be more clarity on their cloud migration strategy."
"The setup is complex."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"The pricing model is problematic."
IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 12th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews. IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0, while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, SAP Process Orchestration, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), whereas Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Apache Airflow, Appian, Pega BPM, Camunda and ARIS Cloud. See our IBM B2B Integrator vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.