No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM API Connect vs Tray.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM API Connect
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
API Management (8th)
Tray.io
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
17th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (29th), Cloud Data Integration (22nd), Low-Code Development Platforms (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of IBM API Connect is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 1.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM API Connect2.2%
Tray.io1.7%
Other96.1%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

ME
DB A Sysadmin Devops Software Ag Adabas/Natural/Ibm Entire X Webmethods at Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT
API management has strengthened security and monitoring but still needs better support and tooling
There are areas of IBM API Connect that need to be improved. I want what Gravitee made, which is much better. Gravitee made many samples for different use cases. First of all, they made examples of use cases, codes, and what the module expects and what the module returns for multiple examples and use cases inside the development. I do not even have to go to the documentation website because everything is included inside the tool when I work on it. This is great, in fact. IBM API Connect should show examples. One other thing is the support. The support of IBM is in India. Every time I want to ask something, they say they need logs, they want this, they want that. Gravitee API asks me to explain the problem without asking a thousand times as if it is a request for a green card in the USA. Then they really explain quickly. IBM is a big company, so everything is standardized with the approach of "You do that, you do that, you request that. If you do not have that, you do not reply to the client." Clients want flexibility today, even if it is a huge company. A stressed client is a client that will want to change to other flexible solutions. When everything is fine, we do not care, but when there is stress and problems, that is when the customer of IBM evaluates the tool really. It is when there are problems. IBM makes a lot of efforts on sales and technical sales, and then that is it.
SS
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Marketing A/B tests have gained deeper insights from user behavior and unified global reporting
The best features Tray.io offers include excellent visualization capabilities and a dashboard, which stand out to me the most. I appreciate that it is very easy to convert the data we receive from Tray.io into dashboards from Power BI, which is extremely useful. I would also appreciate if in the future Tray.io provides a way to natively convert the data to Tableau. Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once. As a multinational and very large company, it is definitely beneficial that those of us in the UK can use the same format that colleagues use in India, and the entire data architecture is framed within a trusted system from an established organization. As far as I know, Tray.io has been operating for the last 12 years, making it a very reliable system.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The management of the API and API portal is good."
"First, they can secure your API ecosystem."
"The most valuable features are: 1. The centralized management: this provides a management module that can deploy and apply security policies to all APIs, including all the gateways that are deployed on-premises and on any cloud because the gateway component can run at a VMware or in a Kubernetes cluster."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is very easy to use and is something that is easily configurable."
"This is a strong and stable solution."
"Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules."
"API Connect is a good product, and everything works fine, all the analytics are good, and it is easy to follow up."
"The technical support is good. Whenever we need anything, we have our IT team work with IBM to change whatever requirement is needed."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."
 

Cons

"A lot of the features require improvement, such as better integration with the other suites of the product and a more secured way to put it on the cloud."
"We've had some issues upgrading to the latest version of the solution."
"Support for this platform could still be improved. It also needs to have more levels of versatility. Its compatibility and integration with different platforms also need improvement."
"It lacks the ability for billing and metering the API usage to invoicing in v3, however, v4 does have this."
"IBM has improved this product significantly in last 2 years but it is still not stable and requires further improvements."
"IBM is also a bit pricey. On top of that, they have bugs that need to be fixed."
"The integration of an API gateway that implements the sidecar pattern, which can be deployed in cloud applications, and expose the microservices directly in each pod, this can be more decentralized components."
"The documentation needs to be a bit better."
"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."
"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."
"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a pretty expensive tool."
"API Connect is expensive - I'd rate their pricing five out of ten."
"It should be cheaper. It has a yearly licensing."
"I haven't seen anyone go from on-premise to the cloud. In fact, I am seeing people go from the cloud to on-premise because the costs can quickly grow on the cloud."
"Pricing for IBM API Connect varies, e.g. it could be subscription-based. Deploying it on private cloud also means you have to own most of the software licensing."
"The price of the solution is very expensive, it can turn many customers away."
"API Connect is quite pricey."
"The price of the solution is expensive. However, there are a lot of customization capabilities."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Insurance Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Construction Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise62
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?
I do not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing details.
What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?
There are areas of IBM API Connect that need to be improved. I want what Gravitee made, which is much better. Gravitee made many samples for different use cases. First of all, they made examples of...
What is your primary use case for IBM API Connect?
The usual use cases for IBM API Connect that I worked with mostly involved three things: security, monitoring, and message control. The purpose was to address these areas, though there was one feat...
What needs improvement with Tray.io?
I believe Tray.io can be improved by offering integration with Tableau, which is still not available. I rated it an eight because there are still some things that can be improved, as I mentioned be...
What is your primary use case for Tray.io?
My main use case for Tray.io is to conduct A/B testing for marketing initiatives that the company has undertaken. We test the deployment of different campaigns across similar cohorts and evaluate w...
What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?
My advice to others considering Tray.io is to trust the process because once the installation is complete, it is extremely easy to deploy and set up. I have rated this product an eight out of ten.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank
Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM API Connect vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.