Hygraph vs IBM FileNet comparison

Hygraph
  • 19 Views
  • 7 Comparison Views
IBM FileNet
Read 94 IBM FileNet reviews
  • 4,628 Views
  • 2,835 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Hygraph and IBM FileNet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: June 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
June 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 793,295 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Hygraph
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
42nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM FileNet
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
94
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Hygraph?
Share your opinion
Moshe Elbaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 23, 2024
A stable content management solution for document management
IBM FileNet is an enterprise content management solution. We use the solution for document management in the legal, insurance, and banking sectors We're implementing an on-premise solution. We're handling the installation of the product and customizing it to build a customized application…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is still a leading ECM solution provider, however the cost to implement and maintain are higher than other solutions."
"1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform."
"For small scale industries, they allow different options. They can do open source. It is the complexity of the data security that they should think about before they choose."
"Talking about the cost is difficult because IBM has offers that combine different products, and each of these offers has different types of licensing. IBM also has a policy that the actual price for a given customer may be very different from the stated book price. It's hard to say whether it's expensive or not."
"My customers have seen ROI. There have been productivity gains, time savings gains, and things that they have been doing much more efficiently in a more modern way than they were before."
"We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency."
"It has reduced operating costs by reducing the amount of manual work needed."
"FileNet is not cheap, but you absolutely get what you pay for. ​"
More IBM FileNet pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
11%
Insurance Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM FileNet?
The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?
The product is expensive. The price was 30% higher than what we needed to pay for IBM. I rate the product’s pricing a ten out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?
The user interface of IBM content management, including the ability to customize screens without the need for coding, could be improved. Customers can use it to split the screen, enhancing its suit...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
SharePoint vs IBM FileNet Logo
SharePoint vs IBM FileNet
Compared 22% of the time
OpenText Documentum vs IBM FileNet Logo
OpenText Documentum vs IBM FileNet
Compared 15% of the time
OpenText Extended ECM vs IBM FileNet Logo
OpenText Extended ECM vs IBM FileNet
Compared 14% of the time
IBM ECM vs IBM FileNet Logo
IBM ECM vs IBM FileNet
Compared 9% of the time
Hyland OnBase vs IBM FileNet Logo
Hyland OnBase vs IBM FileNet
Compared 8% of the time
More IBM FileNet Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
June 2024
Hygraph reportDownload Hygraph product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM FileNet
July 2024
IBM FileNet reportDownload IBM FileNet product report
 

Learn More

Hygraph
IBM
 

Overview

Hygraph is the first native GraphQL Headless CMS focused on Content Federation. As a frontend and backend agnostic API-first solution, Hygraph enables over 50,000 teams around the world to create, enrich, and deliver content programmatically.

IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
June 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: June 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.