Hygraph vs IBM FileNet comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hygraph Logo
13 views|4 comparisons
IBM Logo
5,208 views|3,137 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hygraph and IBM FileNet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: February 2024).
755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The biggest issue is the cost of the FileNet, because the license cost is very high. If a customer doesn't have good technical guides that are aware of the license calculation, they will pay too much. FileNet's license calculation depends on the processor and number of users. So my advice to a new customer is to be very careful with your calculations before purchasing FileNet."
  • "It is still a leading ECM solution provider, however the cost to implement and maintain are higher than other solutions."
  • "FileNet is not cheap, but you absolutely get what you pay for. ​"
  • "For small scale industries, they allow different options. They can do open source. It is the complexity of the data security that they should think about before they choose."
  • "For the medium scale or large scale, I would recommend FileNet. FileNet is free of licensing expenses, thus good for the money. It is not expensive, but worth for the money, especially for medium scale and large scale industries."
  • "​There are lots of components to the product. Make sure before you invest that you know which components you need.​​"
  • "1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform."
  • "The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year."
  • More IBM FileNet Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It provides good stability and scalability for huge enterprises as well.
    Top Answer:The platform's price could be better than other products in the market. It could be simpler to use, considering multiple use cases. We could deploy it easily with some training as well. IBM offers… more »
    Top Answer:We use the platform for the automation of business digitalizing documents. We can turn the digital content into workflows for automation and monitoring processes.
    Ranking
    Views
    13
    Comparisons
    4
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    5,208
    Comparisons
    3,137
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    329
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Hygraph is the first native GraphQL Headless CMS focused on Content Federation. As a frontend and backend agnostic API-first solution, Hygraph enables over 50,000 teams around the world to create, enrich, and deliver content programmatically.

    IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

    There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Insurance Company16%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    February 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2024.
    755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hygraph is ranked 44th in Enterprise Content Management while IBM FileNet is ranked 6th in Enterprise Content Management with 4 reviews. Hygraph is rated 0.0, while IBM FileNet is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "A document management system that helps in document digitalization and workflow management". Hygraph is most compared with , whereas IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM ECM and Alfresco.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.