HPE Zerto Software vs IBM ProtectTIER comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #65. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.8% mindshare in BRS, compared to IBM’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE Zerto Software

Read 359 HPE Zerto Software reviews

24,233 Views
13,813 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

IBM ProtectTIER

Read 7 IBM ProtectTIER reviews

2,465 Views
1,947 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

IBM ProtectTIER

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

IBM ProtectTIER and HPE Zerto Software compete in data protection and recovery. IBM ProtectTIER leads with cost-effective pricing and support, while HPE Zerto is noted for its feature-rich offering, justifying its price premium.

Features: IBM ProtectTIER is known for its data deduplication, offering storage efficiency, seamless integration, and automation for tiered storage management. HPE Zerto Software excels in disaster recovery with continuous data protection, easy migrations, and analytics that provide essential insights.

Room for Improvement: IBM ProtectTIER could enhance its disaster recovery features and user interface intuitiveness. The setup process and scalability options also need refinement. HPE Zerto Software may benefit from improving price competitiveness, enhanced data deduplication like ProtectTIER, and further simplifying setup procedures to reduce complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM ProtectTIER is appreciated for its ease of deployment and robust customer support. HPE Zerto Software provides rapid recovery but could improve deployment simplicity. Customer service for Zerto is comprehensive, focusing on advanced recovery solutions but may lack the straightforward support provided by IBM.

Pricing and ROI: IBM ProtectTIER generally offers a cost-effective solution with strong ROI due to lower initial costs and storage savings. HPE Zerto Software, while carrying a higher price tag, delivers value through its advanced features, appealing to businesses that prioritize operational continuity over budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

359

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

IBM ProtectTIER

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

65th

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 1.8%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM ProtectTIER is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	1.8%
IBM ProtectTIER	0.7%
Other	97.5%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

reviewer2802231

Dev Ops Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

Avdhesh Garg

Technical Lead at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Provides a short-term backup, archive, and cataloging for 20,000 people in our organization

The backup for a large amount of data is slow. When there's a large amount of data, sometimes the backup isn't completed in time. I have a 24 hour cycle, so it doesn't get completed in 24 hours with the large amount of data. With Veritas NetBackup, I can take 20 terabytes of backup in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of setting up replication, the speed, and the ease with which I can fail over and fail back are all excellent aspects of the solution."

"It's helped reduce downtime in certain situations."

"I like that the failover is simple and that it's a stable platform. It makes it easy for us to do failovers in the event that we have an issue. It also makes it easier to do test failovers because we can test it prior to actually doing a real failover. This means that we can pull things back or commit them over on the other side. Zerto streamlines the process instead of having to have a whole team of people who are dedicated to disaster recovery."

"It has reduced downtime, going from 24 hours to four minutes, and the dollar amount would equate to something in the millions for restoring our ERP systems, including manufacturing."

"If we had to deal with a ransomware event, Zerto would be one of the first things I would use, because it is going to be the fastest to restore data to a certain point. If there were a fire in our building, Zerto would be a big thing too, because we would shut down everything that's in our building. In most cases, Zerto is definitely one of the front lines. It's definitely going to be one of our prevalent DRBC layers of protection."

"HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication is great, just based on the small timeline that's there; that's what I found to be most beneficial."

"We own another solution called VMware Site Recovery Manager, SRM. We have licenses for our entire environment and we still decided not to use it. That's how big the difference was in the experience that Zerto provides."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the live migration."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

"Overall IBM ProtectTIER is a great solution. It is easy to use."

"In terms of stability, I've found it to be very stable."

"The command-line interface is good."

"I will highly recommend this product for excellent and quick backup solution in small and large IBM I Series environment."

"The cataloging is the best feature, as it takes millions of frames for the backup and, because it's incremental, it takes less time to complete."

"If you are looking for a reliable and scalable enterprise-class solution, you should consider this solution."

"The most valuable feature is the incremental backup."

"In terms of stability, I've found it to be very stable. I've walked into the server room when it was at 60 degrees Celcius, and it was still running fine."

More IBM ProtectTIER pros

Cons

"Patch management can be better. Although we are doing patch management on the Zerto platform in an automated manner, it can be improved by leveraging some AI-assisted technology. With the help of AI, things are going to be faster in terms of patching the solution."

"The main challenge that I face with this solution is the price."

"The only thing we've noticed that needs improvement is the backend cleanup within VMware. There are some little issues there. I would like to see tighter integration with Vmware... orphan data is an issue within VMware. It doesn't clean up properly when you're moving stuff around."

"My first experience with technical support was not good at all."

"The backup functions are in need of improvement."

"I have had problems with vRAs. When I am trying to restart a host, sometimes the vRAs will hang. I would like it if they wouldn't migrate off or shut themselves down, then I have to manually work with it a lot of the time."

"Zerto could improve by offering more flexible pricing models, especially for startups."

"One aspect I don't appreciate about Zerto is the plug-in, especially when it migrated from appliance from Windows server to the appliance, and you have to configure Active Directory authentication. I think it's unnecessarily complicated."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

"IBM ProtectTIER could improve by being more user-friendly."

"Setting up the system to work with legacy equipment is a bit complex at times."

"My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is to conduct a proof of concept first because everybody's needs are different, and this product is not suitable for every kind of backup."

"The backup for a large amount of data is slow. When there's a large amount of data, sometimes the backup isn't completed in time."

"It is unmanageable. Support would be good."

"I would like the possibility to back up the infrastructure and then replicate it upon on restart, without having to orchestrate the starting of the VM."

"The configuration wizards are still complex and hard to navigate. These should be easier to manage."

"These days, we are thinking about pushing another solution because of the poor support from IBM."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Zerto is like a Ferrari. It's very fast but not the cheapest solution. You're paying a high price for quality and the assurance that you will have the environment up and steady."

"Zerto is more cost-effective than Azure."

"Zerto is very cost-effective. We get really great value for the cost of the service."

"The pricing for this solution could be cheaper. They have two licensing tiers. When we purchased it, they didn't have a license for the cloud model. Certain things that I used to get with the basic licensing are no longer available. They are only available in the Cloud. Overall, the licensing model could be simplified."

"Zerto is pretty reasonable. I haven't checked to see how much Rubrik is going to quote us for their solution. At least for us, the price doesn't play a big factor in the decision-making because it is a pretty small deployment for our use case."

"At the time I had purchased the product, the pricing was fair and reasonable. Over the years, costs have certainly gone up, which makes it hard for healthcare companies to use the solution."

"Its pricing is very competitive. As compared to VMware SRM, Zerto has reduced our OPEX cost by at least 30%."

"It is very expensive. It is overpriced. No doubt. What held us up for many years from committing to buying it was always the cost. That's also why we only have 10 licenses."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

"We have a capacity-based license, which is managed centrally for all the sites of my company."

"The customer can decide how they want to purchase a license. However, the price of the solution is expensive."

"IBM ProtectTIER is an expensive solution."

"This solution is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	94
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	206

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

HPE Zerto Software's GUI needs modernization to match the flexibility and user experience of other HPE software solutions, as there is still room for improvement in software-level flexibility and t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 10% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 8% of the time

CMIT Data Backup vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM ProtectTIER Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

August 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Buyer's Guide

Deduplication Software

August 2026

Download IBM ProtectTIER product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

No data available

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM ProtectTIER is designed for backup and recovery, providing efficient data management for IBM I Series environments. It offers valuable features like self-service, high adaptability, and data search capabilities.

IBM ProtectTIER stands out in environments requiring robust backup and recovery solutions, particularly suited for IBM I Series. Known for its efficiency in managing large volumes of data, it integrates a command-line interface, automatic workload distribution, and a virtual tape library. While highly functional, improvements in redundancy management, interface complexity, and user-friendliness are needed. It also faces challenges in integrating with legacy systems and ensuring fast backup speeds for substantial data loads.

What are the key features of IBM ProtectTIER?

Self-service: Empowers users to manage backups with ease.
Data Search: Facilitates quick retrieval of required data.
High Adaptability: Adjusts efficiently to data shrinkage needs.
Command-line Interface: Provides effective control over operations.
Incremental Backup: Ensures efficient data storage and saving resources.
Workload Movement: Automatically distributes tasks across storage tiers.
Virtual Tape Library: Configurable for multiple drives, enhancing capacity.

What benefits should users look for?

High Efficiency: Processes and catalogs millions of frames quickly.
Risk Reduction: Uses impressive raw capacity ratios to minimize risk.
Ease of Use: Offers capabilities that simplify backup and recovery tasks.

Organizations use IBM ProtectTIER to manage backup and recovery successfully, deploying it in physical and hybrid infrastructures. It supports short-term backup and archiving for internal IT within diverse deployment methods, accommodating thousands of users and multiple clients while securing database backups effectively.

IBM

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Durham Police Department, Re-Store LLC, CenterGrid, pixx.io GmbH, Australian Government Department of Defence, QD, Refresco Gerber

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER

August 2026

Free Report: HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.