HPE Zerto Software vs IBM ProtectTIER comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.1, while IBM is ranked #62. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to IBM’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE Zerto Software

Read 360 HPE Zerto Software reviews

26,822 Views
15,020 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

IBM ProtectTIER

Read 7 IBM ProtectTIER reviews

2,923 Views
2,309 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

IBM ProtectTIER

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

IBM ProtectTIER and HPE Zerto Software compete in data protection and recovery. IBM ProtectTIER leads with cost-effective pricing and support, while HPE Zerto is noted for its feature-rich offering, justifying its price premium.

Features: IBM ProtectTIER is known for its data deduplication, offering storage efficiency, seamless integration, and automation for tiered storage management. HPE Zerto Software excels in disaster recovery with continuous data protection, easy migrations, and analytics that provide essential insights.

Room for Improvement: IBM ProtectTIER could enhance its disaster recovery features and user interface intuitiveness. The setup process and scalability options also need refinement. HPE Zerto Software may benefit from improving price competitiveness, enhanced data deduplication like ProtectTIER, and further simplifying setup procedures to reduce complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM ProtectTIER is appreciated for its ease of deployment and robust customer support. HPE Zerto Software provides rapid recovery but could improve deployment simplicity. Customer service for Zerto is comprehensive, focusing on advanced recovery solutions but may lack the straightforward support provided by IBM.

Pricing and ROI: IBM ProtectTIER generally offers a cost-effective solution with strong ROI due to lower initial costs and storage savings. HPE Zerto Software, while carrying a higher price tag, delivers value through its advanced features, appealing to businesses that prioritize operational continuity over budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

360

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

IBM ProtectTIER

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

62nd

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM ProtectTIER is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	1.9%
IBM ProtectTIER	0.7%
Other	97.4%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Aslah Faseel K

DevOps Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

Avdhesh Garg

Technical Lead at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Provides a short-term backup, archive, and cataloging for 20,000 people in our organization

The backup for a large amount of data is slow. When there's a large amount of data, sometimes the backup isn't completed in time. I have a 24 hour cycle, so it doesn't get completed in 24 hours with the large amount of data. With Veritas NetBackup, I can take 20 terabytes of backup in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I give Zerto's stability a nine out of ten."

"Even though I have been using HPE Zerto Software for just a few months, I find it incredible because it's much better than the CA backup I used previously."

"HPE Zerto Software offers the best features in that it works reliably, has set and forget functionality, and does exactly what it is said to do."

"Most of the time, this is at least a two person job. We used to have three people doing it. Previously, when we had a disaster recovery drill, the way it worked was 12 of us would show up in the office on a Friday night and work overnight from 12:00 AM on Friday night to 8:00 AM in the morning on Saturday. Then, three of us would be working for four hours out of those eight or nine hours just getting applications up and running in Arizona. Now, for the disaster recovery drill, I just stay onsite to help and assist anybody else as they need during that time frame and my work is done in about a 30-minute time frame. This is compared to the four or five hours it used to take for the three of us to do it."

"We can use Zerto to help protect our VMs."

"It's a great platform, if you use it as a recovery system and as a migration tool."

"We are very happy with HPE Zerto Software, and most importantly, we have a 0% loss in data, which is the great thing we have seen in HPE Zerto Software."

"It's helped reduce downtime in certain situations."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

"If you are looking for a reliable and scalable enterprise-class solution, you should consider this solution."

"The solution is highly stable."

"I will highly recommend this product for excellent and quick backup solution in small and large IBM I Series environment."

"In terms of stability, I've found it to be very stable. I've walked into the server room when it was at 60 degrees Celcius, and it was still running fine."

"The most valuable feature is the incremental backup."

"The cataloging is the best feature, as it takes millions of frames for the backup and, because it's incremental, it takes less time to complete."

"The command-line interface is good."

"The most valuable features are the self-service features and the ability to search the data."

More IBM ProtectTIER pros

Cons

"An area for improvement is the support because it gets really expensive. They need to make it a little cheaper. Support also takes time."

"Zerto generates many false positive alerts, which is annoying. I still have thousands of alerts in my inbox, and those are false alerts. When I check there's actually no problem."

"The technical support response needs improvement."

"In future releases, doing backups of the environment we need to be able to do hot backups of the database."

"The setup of the system, although simple to get working, is a little more tricky to get right. This aspect could have benefitted from a bit more explanation."

"The knowledge base could be improved. Sometimes, it's finicky, especially when moving storage around. We've had to redo entire processes, which was time-consuming and resulted in data loss. This has happened multiple times, and despite following support steps and contacting support, we often had to resolve issues on our own."

"Overall, Zerto is doing a very good job. We have experienced a few downtimes on networking. Most of the time, they come up with a solution immediately to sort out any challenge that may affect data flow or data migration. It does not happen frequently. We might experience it once in two months, but when we face any downtime, it does not impact the data."

"When building out a VPG and doing the machine types within Azure, they were not coming across correctly. It would say it had a CPU and memory of a specific type, but it was not accurate... It was a bug and they were working on it."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

"I would like the possibility to back up the infrastructure and then replicate it upon on restart, without having to orchestrate the starting of the VM."

"IBM ProtectTIER could improve by being more user-friendly."

"The backup for a large amount of data is slow. When there's a large amount of data, sometimes the backup isn't completed in time."

"Setting up the system to work with legacy equipment is a bit complex at times."

"These days, we are thinking about pushing another solution because of the poor support from IBM."

"It is unmanageable. Support would be good."

"My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is to conduct a proof of concept first because everybody's needs are different, and this product is not suitable for every kind of backup."

"The configuration wizards are still complex and hard to navigate. These should be easier to manage."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Zerto does a per-workload licensing model, per-server. It is simple and straightforward, but it is not super flexible. It is kind of a one size fits all. They charge the same price for those workloads. I feel like they could have some flexible licensing option possibly based on criticality, just so we could protect less important work. I would love to protect every workload in my environment with Zerto, whether I really need it or not, but the cost is such that I really have to justify that protection. So, if we had some more flexibility, e.g., you could protect servers with a two-, three-, or four-hour RPO at a certain price point versus mission-critical every five minutes, then I would be interested in that."

"You are getting what you pay for, as this is a solution that requires minimal management after it is configured."

"Zerto's price seems fair. It's competitive."

"From a pricing standpoint, there is value in it without question. However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do."

"Its pricing is way better than Veeam."

"It is not the cheapest option on the market, but it offers a number of features that make it a good value for businesses that need a comprehensive disaster recovery plan."

"Obviously, it would be nice to have it for free. Nevertheless, a lot of effort has gone into making it a top-notch product. An excellent product with expert support is never going to be cheap. I think it's fairly priced for what it does and the benefit it brings to our business."

"It's a little bit expensive."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

"IBM ProtectTIER is an expensive solution."

"The customer can decide how they want to purchase a license. However, the price of the solution is expensive."

"This solution is very expensive."

"We have a capacity-based license, which is managed centrally for all the sites of my company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	95
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	207

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with the price, implementation costs, and licensing of HPE Zerto Software is that, as I mentioned before, the licensing is somewhat complicated and the prices are a bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

I believe HPE Zerto Software could improve in certain aspects that emerged after HPE acquired this software. Following the acquisition of this product by HPE, I think there are certain aspects that...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 10% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 7% of the time

CMIT Data Backup vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM ProtectTIER Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

September 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Buyer's Guide

Deduplication Software

September 2026

Download IBM ProtectTIER product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

No data available

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM ProtectTIER is designed for backup and recovery, providing efficient data management for IBM I Series environments. It offers valuable features like self-service, high adaptability, and data search capabilities.

IBM ProtectTIER stands out in environments requiring robust backup and recovery solutions, particularly suited for IBM I Series. Known for its efficiency in managing large volumes of data, it integrates a command-line interface, automatic workload distribution, and a virtual tape library. While highly functional, improvements in redundancy management, interface complexity, and user-friendliness are needed. It also faces challenges in integrating with legacy systems and ensuring fast backup speeds for substantial data loads.

What are the key features of IBM ProtectTIER?

Self-service: Empowers users to manage backups with ease.
Data Search: Facilitates quick retrieval of required data.
High Adaptability: Adjusts efficiently to data shrinkage needs.
Command-line Interface: Provides effective control over operations.
Incremental Backup: Ensures efficient data storage and saving resources.
Workload Movement: Automatically distributes tasks across storage tiers.
Virtual Tape Library: Configurable for multiple drives, enhancing capacity.

What benefits should users look for?

High Efficiency: Processes and catalogs millions of frames quickly.
Risk Reduction: Uses impressive raw capacity ratios to minimize risk.
Ease of Use: Offers capabilities that simplify backup and recovery tasks.

Organizations use IBM ProtectTIER to manage backup and recovery successfully, deploying it in physical and hybrid infrastructures. It supports short-term backup and archiving for internal IT within diverse deployment methods, accommodating thousands of users and multiple clients while securing database backups effectively.

IBM

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Durham Police Department, Re-Store LLC, CenterGrid, pixx.io GmbH, Australian Government Department of Defence, QD, Refresco Gerber

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER

September 2026

Free Report: HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Zerto Software vs. IBM ProtectTIER report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.