We performed a comparison between HPE OneView and Pulseway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."
"Just the ability to provision the servers with storage and network everything within one interface, not having to go into multiple interfaces to provision those pieces."
"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."
"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "
"OneView provides a single console, which is manageable without physical access."
"It's rather simple to use, and that's very important for us."
"Have a single plane of glass across all of the server platforms."
"The easy user interface was what I found most valuable in HPE OneView. For example, if I wanted to know the infrastructure status or I needed to send in any change commands, HPE OneView had simple buttons."
"It gives you remote control and has a mobile app."
"The solution has great workflow and server modules."
"The setup is simple."
"We like the patching of the window updates in the client's systems. You can automatically do updates with a single click."
"It has been very helpful to get notifications about various issues with my servers and network to help me take action to resolve problems before they become major issues."
"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."
"It needs more reporting capabilities."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"We've had issues, for example, with RAM."
"I would like to see them expand into other cloud platforms, non-HPE platforms."
"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."
"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."
"The tool doesn't send automated alerts via email...We should be able to receive notification emails when a server or hardware issue arises, which would be helpful if someone is unavailable in the office."
"They have good technical support but it's not excellent."
"The solution does not allow you to make a script for just one customer."
"GUI needs to be improved and the solution lacks a process for monitoring VOIP calls."
"It would be nice if it also had a desktop application, similar to the phone app, which would allow me to monitor and control computers from my desktop."
"There are some bugs or glitches."
HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews while Pulseway is ranked 14th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 6 reviews. HPE OneView is rated 8.0, while Pulseway is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pulseway writes "A solution with a great monitoring system and ability to control access remotely". HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM and Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator, whereas Pulseway is most compared with Zabbix, Kaseya VSA, Microsoft Configuration Manager, PRTG Network Monitor and Spiceworks. See our HPE OneView vs. Pulseway report.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
