HCL AppScan and Ixia BreakingPoint are leading tools in their respective fields of cybersecurity and network testing. While HCL AppScan is praised for its cost and support, Ixia BreakingPoint is regarded as strong in features, justifying its higher expense.
Features: HCL AppScan offers comprehensive vulnerability assessments, providing detailed insights that boost security. Ixia BreakingPoint focuses on simulating real-world conditions, delivering a wide testing environment. Its threat simulation features are noted as advanced in comparison.
Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could enhance integration with other tools, as some users find it challenging to operate seamlessly. Ixia BreakingPoint users see room for better documentation to fully understand its capabilities, though its complex features still stand out.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan is easy to deploy and supported by responsive customer service. Ixia BreakingPoint, while also straightforward to set up, gets mixed feedback on its customer service, which is described as competent but in need of improvement.
Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is recognized for being cost-effective with a positive ROI according to users. Ixia BreakingPoint, despite a higher initial cost, is still seen to deliver strong ROI attributed to its advanced features, which many see as worth the premium.
IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.
By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
