Gurucul UEBA vs Rapid7 InsightIDR comparison

Gurucul and Rapid7 are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. Gurucul is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Rapid7 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Gurucul holds a 4.0% mindshare in UBA, compared to Rapid7’s 11.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Gurucul users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Gurucul UEBA

Read 4 Gurucul UEBA reviews

1,374 Views
98 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Read 32 Rapid7 InsightIDR reviews

1,028 Views
93 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Gurucul UEBA

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Gurucul UEBA and Rapid7 InsightIDR are competing in the security analytics solutions category. Rapid7 InsightIDR seems to have the upper hand in integration and threat intelligence, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing comprehensive security coverage.

Features: Gurucul UEBA is recognized for its advanced machine learning-powered analytics, precise identification of insider threats and anomalies, and forecasting capabilities. Rapid7 InsightIDR provides integrated threat intelligence, asset identification, and user behavior analytics for a holistic threat view. Its ease of integration with existing systems is a notable advantage, offering adaptability to diverse IT environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a straightforward deployment process with comprehensive support, reducing operationalization time and effort. Gurucul UEBA, while robust, may require more resources and expertise during setup. Rapid7's responsive customer support ensures quick resolution of deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Gurucul UEBA offers a more competitive setup cost structure, appealing to budget-conscious organizations, and provides gradual ROI through its focused features. Rapid7 InsightIDR, despite a higher initial investment, delivers substantial ROI through its extensive threat detection capabilities and efficiencies from seamless integration, providing value that justifies its premium pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Gurucul UEBA vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Gurucul UEBA vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gurucul UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

7th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (15th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (26th), Threat Deception Platforms (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of Gurucul UEBA is 4.0%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightIDR is 11.3%, up from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Ravi Shekharan

Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Helped reduce our operational costs and increase our efficiency, but it can be more user-friendly

Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system. This is one area where Gurucul UEBA could improve. Additionally, it would be beneficial if the tool itself could provide or assign user-based or asset-based CI ratings to allow for a more accurate assessment of alert severity. In our environment, we forward these logs, events, and alerts to SIM, where the CI rating is already present. Therefore, if we need to closely investigate a UEBA case directly, it becomes problematic. Gurucul UEBA should proactively incorporate asset-based or user-based CI severity into its design. Gurucul UEBA needs to be more user-friendly. I would like Gurucul UEBA to be able to integrate with legacy-based identity systems and systems that are performing network-based access control. This would require additional integration and playbook models.

Read full review

Asim Naeem

Principal IT Security & Compliance at IBEX Holdings Ltd

Providing comprehensive insight into alerts while working towards AI enhancement

I definitely recommend Rapid7 InsightIDR. It is becoming better, with improvements being continuously made to the product. Right now, I do not have any advice about Rapid7 for other users because every organization or user has different criteria or multiple use cases, so I refrain from commenting on that. I rate the overall solution seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Gurucul is the ability to customize and it is on the Hadoop platform that has a lot of flexibility."

"If you are genuinely looking for a UEBA solution, you should choose Gurucul confidently if your need is strictly UEBA."

"The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment."

"I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS."

"It is a very stable solution."

"Rapid7 is easy to use and deploy. It is a simple solution and has easy data pulling."

"The UI is very good."

"The incident case management is the most valuable feature. Even though there's always something I find I would like to add to that feature, the ability to quickly sort through all the logs, network and endpoint data, etc., and add it to an incident case as part of the investigation, is nice. Having it automatically timeline that additional data into the original incident timeline, and correlate it to other notable events and activities on the network, results in a huge improvement in our overall confidence that we've quickly traced down the right source of an issue."

"If you were on other solutions, you would notice that they use agents from third-party, from open-source, from a native OS, or from other tools. Here, however, it is an agent from Rapid7 itself. This adds to the solution's overall capabilities."

"The solution's initial setup is easy."

"The technical support is a solid 10 out of 10 as they take the time to answer any questions or problems which may arise in a reasonable time frame."

"InsightIDR helps us investigate an environment to discover information about incidents."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR pros

Cons

"Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system."

"Gurucul can improve on the online documentation. They should educate the end users more to allow them to do everything themselves."

"It could be more stable."

"Technical support is good but can improve. I would rate it six to seven out of ten. The main issue is response time, which can take three to four hours even for simple queries."

"The product allows us to make only 30 custom rules."

"The interface for doing investigation needs to be enhanced with minor improvements that would make it more useful."

"They should add more configuration and security features to it."

"InsightIDR's integration with other solutions could be improved. Also, I'd like more control from the portal over what's happening on the endpoint side. For example, when I see an attack on an endpoint, I want to be able to stop it from the portal."

"There is a future in AI with Rapid7, however, it is not fully operated. There are certain limitations with Rapid7 that I am working on."

"The reporting is the weakest aspect. There needs to be multi-level grouping for events (for example, group by user and destination). Right now, we can do a group by user and a separate table or group by destination. But I'd be more interested in where a person was logging into instead of who was logging in or where he was logging in."

"It takes time for the product's support team to resolve issues, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I would like the ability to adjust the threshold of certain existing alerts. Currently the only option is to change the notifications or create my own alert."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Gurucul is competitive."

"The price is fair. In fact, I believe it was on the cheaper side when compared to the competition."

"Rapid7 InsightIDR is priced very well and is cost-effective."

"The team is very willing to work with companies. My suggestion is to call the Rapid7 sales department and see how they can help."

"Licensing is straightforward. If, for some reason, you don’t meet the minimum licensing requirements, there is a third-party managed service that can help."

"The pricing is good, and it is not very expensive."

"Rapid7 InsightIDR is a cheaply priced product. On a scale of one to ten, where one is very expensive, and ten is very cheap, I rate the product's price at seven or eight."

"It is a reasonably priced solution."

"I am sure that there are cheaper products out there, but none that meet so many of our needs whilst maintaining stability and usability."

"Licensing is by endpoint and amount of retention time (at least ours is). Default retention was one year, but we are able to push the retention further if needed. There's also a provide-your-own-S3 option for longer retention if you don't want to pay for the additional retention years in your Rapid7 agreement."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Gurucul?

I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gurucul?

For improvement, I have requested three enhancement tickets, which are already lodged with the Gurucul support team. The first request is to add a visualization option in reports for charts or grap...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gurucul?

Regarding the use cases, I have created many use cases in Gurucul UEBA. It's easy to create use cases based on behaviors.

See all answers

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightIDR?

During simulations or demonstrations, the tool generates alerts, providing details such as the specific application, its origin, and potential threats. For instance, it can identify if an applicati...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightIDR?

The product pricing is very cheap.

See all answers

Comparisons

Exabeam vs Gurucul UEBA

Compared 36% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Gurucul UEBA

Compared 33% of the time

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Gurucul UEBA

Compared 18% of the time

Wazuh vs Gurucul UEBA

Compared 12% of the time

More Gurucul UEBA Competitors

Darktrace vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 9% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Gurucul UEBA

June 2025

Download Gurucul UEBA product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightIDR

June 2025

Download Rapid7 InsightIDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

InsightIDR

Overview

Threats are a moving target. Determined and persistent threat actors purposely stretch out their activity across weeks or even months, especially when most SIEM and XDR solutions are incapable of piecing together events across time. Even worse, is that these solutions primarily use rule-based Machine Learning, which is essentially pattern matching. This makes them especially ineffective in detecting new attacks and/or variants, which are highly successful in breaching organizations. Discover how Gurucul UEBA security can help your enterprise.

Gurucul

Parsing hundreds of trivial alerts. Managing a mountain of data. Manually forwarding info from your endpoints. Forget that. InsightIDR instantly arms you with the insight you need to make better decisions across the incident detection and response lifecycle, faster.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Global semi-conductor company

Liberty Wines, Pioneer Telephone, Visier

Buyer's Guide

Gurucul UEBA vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

June 2025

Free Report: Gurucul UEBA vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Gurucul UEBA vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gurucul UEBA vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.