We chose Rapid7 because of its price. IBM QRadar charges us based on data storage. Rapid7 InsightIDR charges us based on the endpoints we connect to. We are satisfied with the product’s price.
Rapid7 InsightIDR is a cheaply priced product. On a scale of one to ten, where one is very expensive, and ten is very cheap, I rate the product's price at seven or eight.
Rapid7 InsightIDR's pricing is reasonable but we have challenges with the Minimum Order Quantity. It is not reasonable for customers who have less than one hundred devices. If they can reduce Minimum Order Quantity, it is good. You have to pay around 5000-6000 dollars per year for the product. The pricing includes maintenance and support costs.
I rate InsightIDR six out of 10 for affordability. It isn't the cheapest solution I've seen, but it offers a greater value than less expensive competitors.
InsightIDR is quite expensive. But with on-prem solutions, you need to wait for delivery then spend more money on maintenance and hardware. So any customer who understands cloud applications knows they just need to buy the license for the year. Then they can use it, and it's not hard to manage.
Licensing costs are based on a subscription model. The solution is very cost-effective because they are not charging based on the EPS but on the number of assets.
Enterprise Sales at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
2020-07-19T08:15:52Z
Jul 19, 2020
If you look at any other SIEM solution, the license is based on events per second or EPS based licensing. Here, the licensing is the number of assets, and the number of days the log would be retained on their cloud. That is one of the huge differences between this solution and the competition.
Information Security Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Real User
2018-10-02T19:05:00Z
Oct 2, 2018
Licensing is by endpoint and amount of retention time (at least ours is). Default retention was one year, but we are able to push the retention further if needed. There's also a provide-your-own-S3 option for longer retention if you don't want to pay for the additional retention years in your Rapid7 agreement.
Parsing hundreds of trivial alerts. Managing a mountain of data. Manually forwarding info from your endpoints. Forget that. InsightIDR instantly arms you with the insight you need to make better decisions across the incident detection and response lifecycle, faster.
We chose Rapid7 because of its price. IBM QRadar charges us based on data storage. Rapid7 InsightIDR charges us based on the endpoints we connect to. We are satisfied with the product’s price.
Rapid7 InsightIDR is a cheaply priced product. On a scale of one to ten, where one is very expensive, and ten is very cheap, I rate the product's price at seven or eight.
Rapid7 InsightIDR is priced very well and is cost-effective.
Rapid7 InsightIDR's pricing is reasonable.
Rapid7 InsightIDR's pricing is reasonable but we have challenges with the Minimum Order Quantity. It is not reasonable for customers who have less than one hundred devices. If they can reduce Minimum Order Quantity, it is good. You have to pay around 5000-6000 dollars per year for the product. The pricing includes maintenance and support costs.
I rate InsightIDR six out of 10 for affordability. It isn't the cheapest solution I've seen, but it offers a greater value than less expensive competitors.
The pricing is good, and it is not very expensive.
The solution's license costs around Rs. 20,00,000. It is more reasonable than other vendors. I rate its pricing as an eight.
I rate Rapid7 nine out of 10 for affordability
It is on a yearly basis. For our own company, for about 250 users, it was 16,000 euros a year.
InsightIDR is quite expensive. But with on-prem solutions, you need to wait for delivery then spend more money on maintenance and hardware. So any customer who understands cloud applications knows they just need to buy the license for the year. Then they can use it, and it's not hard to manage.
Licensing costs are based on a subscription model. The solution is very cost-effective because they are not charging based on the EPS but on the number of assets.
You can scale the license as needed. It's really easy to update and upgrade.
It is a reasonably priced solution.
If you look at any other SIEM solution, the license is based on events per second or EPS based licensing. Here, the licensing is the number of assets, and the number of days the log would be retained on their cloud. That is one of the huge differences between this solution and the competition.
Licensing is by endpoint and amount of retention time (at least ours is). Default retention was one year, but we are able to push the retention further if needed. There's also a provide-your-own-S3 option for longer retention if you don't want to pay for the additional retention years in your Rapid7 agreement.
The pricing and licensing are competitive. Licensing is simple and straightforward.