No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gupshup vs MoEngage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gupshup
Ranking in AI Customer Experience Personalization
6th
Ranking in AI Sales & Marketing
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Customer Communications Management (CCM) (2nd), Conversation Intelligence Software (3rd), AI Customer Support (4th)
MoEngage
Ranking in AI Customer Experience Personalization
4th
Ranking in AI Sales & Marketing
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Marketing Automation (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the AI Customer Experience Personalization category, the mindshare of Gupshup is 0.9%. The mindshare of MoEngage is 0.8%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Customer Experience Personalization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
MoEngage0.8%
Gupshup0.9%
Other98.3%
AI Customer Experience Personalization
 

Featured Reviews

Jaspreet k - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of development at Flash
Improving customer engagement has transformed how our AI chatbots drive conversational sales
I do not feel that Gupshup needs any improvement. It is an absolute solution, and I believe they do not need improvements in UI, UX, customer support, product visibility, or learning curve. Everything is very detailed, and I feel it is the best in this segment. I do not have any suggestions for improvement. I do see advancements of AI and ML in the upcoming years as a potential area for Gupshup to focus on further. I am witnessing new LLM and models emerging in the industry daily, so naturally, I think the AI agents could be improved. Beyond that, I do not feel anything else is needed as an improvement.
Vyas Shubham - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Quality Analyst at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Targeted lifecycle journeys have boosted engagement and have improved retention continuously
There is definitely room for improvement in MoEngage. A few challenges and pain points I have experienced include the learning curve for advanced features. Although the basic interface is user-friendly, some advanced capabilities such as complex segmentations, journey logic, and event configuration can present a steeper learning curve. Our new users require training to fully utilize the platform, and debugging complex journeys is not always intuitive. Improvement in guided workflows or more interactive onboarding would help us make better use of MoEngage. While the platform provides solid analytics, there are limitations regarding deep customization and advanced reporting, with limited flexibility in creating highly custom reports. We have noted that exporting and combining data for deeper analysis sometimes requires external tools, so enhancing analytics capabilities or offering more customizable dashboards would significantly add value to the platform. Additionally, we have observed minor delays in real-time data syncing when managing large user volumes, and event-based triggers may occasionally face delays. While these are not major issues, improving real-time responsiveness would strengthen time-sensitive campaigns on our platform. One improvement would be UI/UX enhancements in campaign management because, while the UI is generally clean, managing multiple campaigns and journeys at scale can feel slightly cluttered. Navigating between campaigns and flows can be optimized, and better visualization for complex journeys would help us significantly. A more streamlined interface for large-scale operations would enhance usability. I believe one area for further development could be more advanced AI-driven automation. For example, smarter recommendations for campaign timing, audience selection, or next best actions would be beneficial. While the current predictive features are useful, further maturity would make the platform even more proactive and reduce manual optimization efforts.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Gupshup is doing a good job in terms of accuracy and reliability, and they can keep doing so."
"I believe Gupshup has made the process of integrating WhatsApp for customers more agile."
"We have achieved a 97 to 98 percent successful delivery rate for business-critical OTPs and transactional notifications."
"My main use case with Gupshup was flawless; it was very user-friendly, and I personally loved using it."
"I believe Gupshup is one of the best services that I have used for sending notifications, and I totally trust it."
"In my experience, the best features Gupshup offers include the ability for a user with no prior knowledge of code to also use this platform if they are creative."
"At BookMyShow, I typically achieved delivery rates above 95%, read rates between 60 to 80%, and click-through rates noticeably higher than other comparable tools."
"Gupshup has positively impacted my organization in multiple ways, significantly impacting the bottom line and providing an overall return through the WhatsApp automation report showing around 398 percent on investment over a three-year period."
"MoEngage has positively impacted my organization because the delivery rate from MoEngage is really high, and I receive a very low amount of bounce-back rates and undeliverable email IDs because it has an automatic feature of segregating nullable and invalid email IDs."
"MoEngage has positively impacted my organization by helping me send notifications to active users so they return to the app and place orders again, which has increased my orders, and specifically, we have seen an increased retention rate for our customers and order volume has increased by 20%."
"MoEngage's scope as an analytics engine is significant, and I am confident that it will provide insights to product managers to improve their products, and I encourage everyone to try it."
"MoEngage has positively impacted my organization by increasing the number of orders placed."
"MoEngage positively impacts our organization by helping us give an idea to our customers about a product, new product launches, new store openings, and offers, making it quite easy to communicate with the customers."
"Since I use MoEngage for retargeting, I have achieved a reduction in ROI of approximately 40% on user acquisition costs and cost per lead."
"MoEngage has been helping us by enabling batch and blast communications to highly targeted and automated customers engaging through behavioral segments and personalized journeys."
"In my opinion, the best feature that MoEngage offers is a well-designed funnel report with a timeline."
 

Cons

"I think their customer support needs to be improved as they have a very slow response time and lack local support, especially in Indonesia."
"I would appreciate more granular error code documentation for edge case API delivery failures, deeper out-of-the-box integration with cloud monitoring tools such as AWS CloudWatch or DataDog for native metric scraping, and a more responsive administrative console when querying massive historical message logs."
"Gupshup can be improved in terms of the UI and the design of the particular model."
"I remember that I was trying to get the webhooks about account information, and I had trouble finding in the documentation how I could receive webhooks about the account, such as when we have an account that could be blocked or when the limit of messages might be erased."
"My feedback regarding Gupshup is that during the DLT setting of IDs in the SMS and WhatsApp section, whatever is written in the portal has to be precise."
"I think Gupshup could be improved with online support or WhatsApp support so that we can talk directly with an agent, instead of working only by email."
"Gupshup could be improved by adding more selection of templates."
"If I suggest an improvement, I would desire to see deeper analytics."
"MoEngage's AI capabilities could improve, especially in helping me determine how to target certain user groups effectively rather than sending broad notifications to all users."
"MoEngage can be improved because although the platform is really user-friendly, it sometimes becomes slow when I click and enter."
"MoEngage needs to improve their customer support. When I encounter an issue, their customer support team has a slow response time for answering my queries."
"Though MoEngage is a really good product, as we are using it on a basic level, one area of improvement is the ease of use for some of the advanced features."
"MoEngage can be improved primarily as the reporting is not good, so if I want to see detailed customer information, how many messages I have sent, and what the impact is, those things are not good in MoEngage."
"MoEngage can be improved in the sense that while it is aligned to a mobile-first business strategy, bigger organizations with multiple business entities have complex requirements."
"While MoEngage is one of the top marketing automation tools available, I have found that integrating it with other platforms can be moderate compared to Salesforce Marketing Cloud, where data flow processes such as daily data dumps and real-time data refreshes are easier to manage."
"Regarding improvements, I think the support team is very irresponsible and needs to be more active."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Customer Experience Personalization solutions are best for your needs.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
26%
Construction Company
16%
University
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Construction Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gupshup?
Regarding the metering and billing experience, I feel that Gupshup has provided me exceptional results. The payment plans and model for paying directly were not expensive at all. I am essentially a...
What needs improvement with Gupshup?
I do not feel that Gupshup needs any improvement. It is an absolute solution, and I believe they do not need improvements in UI, UX, customer support, product visibility, or learning curve. Everyth...
What is your primary use case for Gupshup?
I have been using Gupshup for the last four years in the organization for SMS API management. Gupshup serves as a provider for the API, helping us to get the OTPs and the omnichannel transactional ...
What needs improvement with MoEngage?
An area where MoEngage can be improved is by adding features through more in-depth onboarding tutorials, since a new user may take time to get used to the wide range of features. Also, it would be ...
What is your primary use case for MoEngage?
My main use case for MoEngage is for communicating with patients and using it as an engagement platform where we send timely reminders about upcoming appointments to patients, follow-up after treat...
What advice do you have for others considering MoEngage?
My advice for others looking into using MoEngage is that they should definitely consider it because it aids in customer retention and engagement. For our dental clinic, we are gaining more and more...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Gupshup vs. MoEngage and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.