We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and SAP Business One on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Google Cloud is a good alternative solution. I think it's a better fit for Mac operating systems than Windows. If you're utilizing Google Cloud for something like big data, then their big query is decent."
"Simple to use on the web, and makes things easy for a software developer."
"The solution is fairly easy to deploy."
"The customer service team for this solution is very knowledgeable."
"I like the simple features that allow me to share documents with others."
"Google Cloud is user friendly and reliable. The most valuable feature is the security of Google Cloud."
"The solution scales well."
"Google Cloud is easy to use and accessible anywhere."
"The way we can make changes in new fields, or make new rules with our IT department, has been very useful."
"Setting up Business One is straightforward. It took us about three months to deploy Business One on AWS."
"SAP Business One on AWS has good documentation and has many services in the cloud."
"Technical support from SAP is great."
"The most valuable features of SAP Business One on AWS are the CRM and the sales module."
"If there were more documentation and training, it would be very helpful in explaining the underlying processes."
"The Spanish version is in beta. It needs to be farther along."
"The product could be improved by expanding the initial storage space available."
"The storage available for this solution could be improved, especially compared to a solution like Microsoft which offers 1 TB of storage. Google cloud offers only 30 GB."
"I would improve the integration with other devices such as smartphones. It is integrated in our company, but I think it could be improved."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"Uploading documents could be simplified."
"SAP Business One on AWS could improve by having more customization and more user-friendly automation."
"SAP Business One on AWS could improve by adding more functionality to the web client."
"The look-and-feel of the system is quite outdated as compared to a lot of other products out there."
"I would like SAP to replace Business One's fixed Web client with a native Web solution. Right now, their remote access is based on RVP. We have to access the solution through a Windows-based client. It's not a native Web interface."
"The solution has a feature that shows you the purchase order that you put on a project and requires you to approve it to be applied to the project, but it doesn't let you move the purchase order to another project. That would be a great feature to have, because if you don't approve it, you have to delete everything and make it again."
Google Cloud is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 29 reviews while SAP Business One on AWS is ranked 4th in Cloud ERP with 5 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while SAP Business One on AWS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "It's easy to deploy next-generation applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Business One on AWS writes "Valuable project features that include adding new fields and rules to customize the solution to our business". Google Cloud is most compared with Oracle Cloud Platform, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Alibaba Cloud, SAP Cloud Platform and IBM Public Cloud, whereas SAP Business One on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud and Alibaba Cloud. See our Google Cloud vs. SAP Business One on AWS report.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
