GoCD vs TeamCity comparison

Thoughtworks and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Thoughtworks is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.3, while JetBrains is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.8. Thoughtworks holds a 1.8% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Thoughtworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

960 Views
624 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

1,934 Views
1,934 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

GoCD

TeamCity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

GoCD and TeamCity are competing products in the realm of continuous integration and continuous delivery tools, offering distinct advantages in various areas. TeamCity tends to lead in feature set versatility, offering more comprehensive integrations, while GoCD stands out in pipeline modeling flexibility.

Features: GoCD provides efficient pipeline modeling and features such as value stream mapping that aid in deployment tracking. It supports extensive integration options and visual representations of build pipelines. TeamCity, on the other hand, offers numerous framework integrations, comprehensive build management capabilities, and a suite of plugins. Its support for cross-platform builds and seamless IDE integration are particularly notable.

Room for Improvement: GoCD could improve by expanding its plugin library and refining its user interface for newer users. The limited plugin availability can restrict flexibility. Enhanced documentation could benefit complex setup scenarios. TeamCity's initial configuration complexity might be streamlined for quicker user onboarding, and the cost associated with its robust feature set may be a barrier for smaller teams. It could benefit from more straightforward licensing models and pricing structures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD emphasizes a swift deployment process with wide platform compatibility. Its community-driven support aids in troubleshooting and learning. TeamCity offers a polished deployment experience supported by comprehensive online documentation and dedicated, responsive customer service, although the initial setup can be more complex compared to GoCD.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD, being open source, is cost-effective for budget-conscious teams, offering customizable solutions with minimal upfront costs. TeamCity, a paid platform, provides significant ROI with its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, justifying the expense for enterprises needing robust support and integration options. While GoCD is more accessible cost-wise, TeamCity offers a more feature-rich environment that could drive more strategic returns.

To learn more, read our detailed GoCD vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. TeamCity

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GoCD

Ranking in Build Automation

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (16th), Release Automation (10th)

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GoCD is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 6.8%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
TeamCity	6.8%
GoCD	1.8%
Other	91.4%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Nishant Narayan Singh

DevOps Architect at Cognizant

Simplifies the pipeline process, but the access control system needs enhancement

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified. The folder structure is another aspect that could be enhanced, as all jobs are displayed on a single page without the clear organization seen in Jenkins. Implementing a more structured approach to organizing jobs would improve user experience. AI could simplify job creation. For example, instead of manually editing pipelines as code, an AI tool could allow users to input variables and automatically generate the required jobs. It would help reduce human errors, such as issues that arise from incorrect edits in large code files.

Read full review

Almoeeni Fazal

Python Django developer at Cielo WiGle Inc.

Impressive pipeline efficiency with helpful support and a fairly straightforward setup

We use TeamCity for the CI/CD pipeline. It is used for deploying code from the desktop to the production environment. We push our code to GitHub, which then creates a pipeline to a server using AWS, deploying automatically without errors or conflicts in GitHub branches. We also use TeamCity's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"The UI is colorful."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes."

"Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end."

"TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."

"I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC."

"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."

"It is very easy to use, and its speed is impressive, allowing the code to be ready for production in seconds."

"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."

"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."

More TeamCity pros

Cons

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"The integration between other solutions and TeamCity could be smoother."

"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."

"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."

"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."

"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."

"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."

"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."

"I would like to see an improvement where TeamCity alerts us via email or another medium if there are discrepancies between the code in the staging environment and what has been deployed to production, such as missing updates."

More TeamCity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoCD?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

See all answers

What do you like most about TeamCity?

One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 32% of the time

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 31% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 21% of the time

Tekton vs GoCD

Compared 16% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 38% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 16% of the time

Harness vs TeamCity

Compared 12% of the time

Jenkins vs TeamCity

Compared 11% of the time

Tekton vs TeamCity

Compared 6% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

October 2025

Download GoCD product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

September 2025

Download TeamCity product report

Also Known As

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

No data available

Overview

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. TeamCity

September 2025

Free Report: GoCD vs. TeamCity

Find out what your peers are saying about GoCD vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoCD vs. TeamCity report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.