

Acunetix and GitHub are prominent tools in their respective domains, with Acunetix focusing on vulnerability management and GitHub on code collaboration. Acunetix holds an edge in security compliance and deployment options, whereas GitHub excels in collaboration ease and cost-effectiveness.
Features: Acunetix stands out with its ability to quickly identify vulnerabilities, schedule and conduct continuous API scans, and integrate seamlessly with CI/CD tools. GitHub, meanwhile, offers robust code versioning, easy integration with various third-party tools, and is praised for its user-friendly management setup.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix could benefit from better pricing models, fewer false positives, and improved support for complex authentication protocols. Meanwhile, GitHub needs to enhance integration with AI tools, offer better user experience, and expand storage capacity for large-scale projects.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix supports a variety of deployment environments, including on-premises and cloud solutions, and generally provides responsive support. GitHub is easy to deploy as a cloud-oriented service, recognized for accessible support and robust free-tier features.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is known for a complex and often higher pricing structure, but users report significant ROI through improved security measures. GitHub offers more affordable pricing, especially beneficial for open-source projects, with clear and favored cost structures.
Using GitHub reduces, on average, one to two hours of time daily for making things ready, so it has very good metrics.
We reduced the time we spent on manual tasks or literally waiting for automations and processes running on the platform to finish, and we improved our SLA as a result.
I was able to save time during deployments and optimize my spending, which helped me reduce costs.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
The time needed to complete an assessment is one-third of what it would take for a security assessment because we don't have much manual assessment involved now that we have added automated assessment.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.
The customer support does a great job, and I am happy they find solutions for my issues quickly.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.
I can easily give updates from VS Code and commit messages directly to the GitHub repository by just using Git commands.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Invicti Web + API handles growth well, as it scales up easily with more users or more applications to test.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.
I give GitHub a four-star rating for stability because it's an open-source solution.
Maybe it could be simplified a bit more, or simplified versions could be created for users who don’t need so much information.
When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.
I am providing this feedback for Copilot because it seems more widespread and more companies allow it rather than Amp, and it would be beneficial if they catch up with Amp on this capability.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
I have not encountered any initial setup cost for that.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
The pull request facility for code review.
For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.
When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| GitHub | 2.6% |
| Invicti Web + API | 2.6% |
| Other | 94.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 55 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
GitHub is a platform that enhances collaboration and version control among developers, utilizing robust integration tools and features suitable for distributed teams. Its capabilities cater to diverse coding and project workflows, supporting effective team contributions and project deployments.
GitHub efficiently manages code repositories, facilitating seamless collaboration in distributed environments. It incorporates features beneficial for continuous integration and continuous deployment with tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions. Recognized for its code-sharing, security, and branch management capabilities, GitHub serves as a versatile development hub. However, there's room for enhancement in project management, testing, and AI integration, with users expressing a need for better documentation, reporting, and enhanced user experience through improved automation and interface simplification.
What features make GitHub essential?GitHub is implemented widely in software development industries, supporting teams that require centralized platforms for code management. It is crucial for maintaining code integrity and facilitating developer communication. Industries rely on it for integrating tools essential for their CI/CD pipelines, accelerating project timelines, and organizing development tasks through collaborative workflows.
Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.
Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.
What features make Acunetix stand out?Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.