Qt Squish vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Qt Group and Progress Software are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qt Group is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while Progress Software is ranked #26. Qt Group holds a 3.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to Progress Software’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Qt Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

2,952 Views
2,450 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,206 Views
603 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Qt Squish and Telerik Test Studio are automated testing tools. Qt Squish has an edge in specific scenarios due to its robust integration capabilities, while Telerik Test Studio is known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features.

Features: Qt Squish offers cross-platform testing, advanced scripting with Python, and extensive support for desktop applications. Telerik Test Studio provides intuitive test automation for web and desktop applications, codeless test creation, and seamless integration with Visual Studio.

Room for Improvement: Qt Squish can improve by offering more codeless testing options, enhancing visual testing features, and expanding its support for mobile platforms. Telerik Test Studio could benefit from better integration with non-Microsoft environments, more flexible pricing options, and greater customization capabilities in test reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qt Squish offers smooth deployment with comprehensive documentation and integration support, focusing on technical accuracy. Telerik Test Studio provides rapid deployment and excellent customer service with prompt support and user-friendly guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Qt Squish involves a higher initial setup cost but offers long-term value for complex environments. Telerik Test Studio presents a more affordable setup with a quicker ROI, attributed to its easy adaptability and cost-efficient maintenance.

To learn more, read our detailed Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (24th), Load Testing Tools (17th), Regression Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.2%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"It is very stable."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"I can perform Java SWT."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

Cons

"The price could be better."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"You need to set up some special environment variables."

"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"It is expensive."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

16%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 19% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 15% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 14% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 11% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 10% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 33% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 19% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 13% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 8% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

July 2025

Download Qt Squish product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

July 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

froglogic Squish

No data available

Overview

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio

May 2025

Free Report: Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.