IBM DevOps Test UI vs Qt Squish comparison

IBM and Qt Group are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

1,693 Views
897 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

4,091 Views
3,273 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and Qt Squish based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Regression Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,051 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (26th), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Qt Squish

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (13th)

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"The technical support is good; at least their response time is good, and whenever we ask them for help regarding deployment customizations, custom code implementation, or other code needs, they heavily support us, assign us IT engineers who work alongside us helping with code-related issues, and stay until the problem is resolved."

"It helps in automation by using better object recognition as compared to other tools in the market."

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester, which analyzes the changes in UI elements and allows me to automatically adapt and change my automation testing."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"By automating regression test suites using this product, we were able to show time savings of more than 1200 hours in less than ONE year."

"As it is built on Ellipse/Java and costs less than other tools, it is recommended."

More IBM DevOps Test UI pros

"Squish's data-driven testing is very powerful, so it will never be stuck if the size of data is too heavy."

"The most important part is that it allows me to create black box tests faster and easier."

"It supports many platforms, which helps in getting automation solutions for most of the complex UI products."

"Stable automation framework with its own object library enabled us to move all of the tests to a Continuous Integration farm."

"It is very stable."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"If you are looking for simple, not expensive, with nice support and for Qt-application tool – I think, it’s the best one."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

More Qt Squish pros

Cons

"With version 8.5 we faced workspace crash issues frequently."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"The object repository used for identifying objects can be made better. It has been noticed that the RFT tool is unable to identify some objects, due to which we are unable to add them to the object repository."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"It does not fully justify being a paid tool, and it needs improvement."

"If you look at today's current context, I wouldn't recommend RFT because there are far more advanced solutions and products available."

More IBM DevOps Test UI cons

"Sometimes, I had problems, but their support team resolved almost of them in short time."

"It still requires better solutions for object identification and an enhancement to identify all the objects of the AUT before building the object map."

"Robotics automation could be added with Squish."

"The most complete way of testing is on several OS's, even platforms. Here, the solution provided by Squish, through several Python script files, could be simplified in such a way, so that even black box testers could manage it easily."

"As things stand, continuous integration is very poor, and when you work in production you need many more settings in order to tune it, to be a Web user interface, for example, which is currently impossible."

"Features like recovery scenarios can be added as an improvement Reporting can be improved."

"You need to set up some special environment variables."

"The price could be better."

More Qt Squish cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"It is expensive."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,051 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

22%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 16% of the time

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 8% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 5% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

May 2026

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

May 2026

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

froglogic Squish

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI offers robust automation testing features that support .NET and Java scripting. It integrates with IBM Rational Performance Tester and supports various applications, making regression testing and automation efficient.

IBM DevOps Test UI provides powerful object identification and third-party library integration. It adapts well to automation testing needs and integrates with testing management tools, including compatibility with Siebel, SAP, and more. Users perceive it as easy to implement and highly compatible with technology stacks, enabling enhanced automation efficiency. While improvements are needed in mobile app UI analysis and Linux application compatibility, it remains a strong choice for teams focused on automation testing.

What features make IBM DevOps Test UI stand out?

Support for .NET and Java scripting: Allows efficient script creation for diverse testing scenarios.
Robust object identification: Enhances precision in automation testing.
Integration with third-party libraries: Expands testing capabilities.
UI component tester: Facilitates smooth automation testing adaptation.
Test management tool integration: Works with tools like IBM Rational Performance Tester.
Compatibility with Siebel, SAP, and more: Supports testing across a wide range of applications.

What benefits do users seek in IBM DevOps Test UI?

Efficiency in regression testing: Proven track record of reliability in repetitive testing tasks.
Easy implementation: Simplifies integration into existing processes.
Broad technology compatibility: Supports a variety of testing environments.

IBM DevOps Test UI is employed extensively for website functionality testing and database integration. Entities within banking and telecom sectors frequently use it for test automation and data creation, often pairing it with IBM Rational Functional Tester to effectively meet testing demands.

IBM

Qt Squish is a versatile testing tool that supports Python, integrates with Rational Quality Manager, and handles multiple toolkits. It efficiently boosts code quality with features like auto-completion and a comprehensive dashboard while supporting diverse languages and providing strong documentation.

Qt Squish is known for its robust capability in automatic testing, particularly in GUI and regression testing applications across real-time control, embedded systems, and hybrid frameworks. The tool enables behavior-driven development with Gherkin Syntax, integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, and facilitates effective data-driven and distributed batch testing. Users gain significant value from its compatibility with Qt applications, multiple platforms, extensive language support, and integration with other development tools. Although there are suggestions for improving reporting, configuration for less technical users, Git integration, and object identification, Qt Squish still stands out for its exceptional capability in mapping UI components and supporting automated UI testing.

What are the important features of Qt Squish?

Python Compatibility: Facilitates Python scripting and automation.
Rational Quality Manager Integration: Enhances test management.
Multi-Toolkit Support: Provides flexibility across toolkits.
Auto-Completion: Boosts coding productivity.
Accurate UI Mapping: Essential for precise component identification.
CI System Integration: Simplifies integration into CI workflows.
Behavior-Driven Development: Supports Gherkin Syntax for BDD.
Extensive Language Support: Enables testing in diverse scripting languages.

What benefits should reviews highlight?

Remote Testing: Facilitates testing geographically distributed systems.
Data-Driven Testing: Leverages extensive data sources for testing.
Robust Documentation: Provides comprehensive user guidance.
Intuitive IDE: Streamlines the development and testing workflow.

Industries such as real-time traffic control, embedded systems, and hybrid applications frequently use Qt Squish for automated testing. The ability to integrate with CI/CD pipelines and compatibility with multiple scripting languages makes it an ideal solution for organizations focusing on GUI and regression testing. Companies benefit from its seamless integration with diverse data sources and development tools, enabling efficient automated UI testing across all relevant platforms.

Qt Group

Sample Customers

Edumate

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,051 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.