IBM Rational Functional Tester vs froglogic Squish comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between froglogic Squish and IBM Rational Functional Tester based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. froglogic Squish Report (Updated: July 2020).
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac.""froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

More froglogic Squish Pros →

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pros →

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package.""ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

More froglogic Squish Cons →

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Cons →

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:I think the licensing price is okay. I believe for one person, the cost is around 2,000 Euros. That's the initial cost, after that you buy support and it cost 800 Euros, which is much lower, It's a… more »
Top Answer:I'm not completely satisfied because although the ID is good, it could be improved with suggestions of names for some method, for example, or variable, or class. I'd like to see suggestions for… more »
Top Answer:We are customers of Froglogic and I'm an automation quality assurance engineer.
Top Answer:RFT needs to think from a contemporary point of view — from the current context. They need to look at the way they're positioning the tool. They need to do a complete revamp so that even a… more »
Top Answer:Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time.
Top Answer:Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Also Known As
Rational Functional Tester
Learn More

Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

  • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
  • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
  • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
  • Eclipse-based IDE
  • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
  • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
  • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
  • testing capabilities
  • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
  • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface
IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.
Learn more about froglogic Squish
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Sample Customers
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Top Industries
Computer Software Company22%
Manufacturing Company13%
Comms Service Provider11%
Healthcare Company7%
Computer Software Company20%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
Small Business53%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise33%
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise66%
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise56%
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. froglogic Squish
July 2020
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. froglogic Squish and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.

froglogic Squish is ranked 15th in Test Automation Tools with 2 reviews while IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. froglogic Squish is rated 8.6, while IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". froglogic Squish is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio, Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio and LEAPWORK, whereas IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Worksoft Certify. See our IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. froglogic Squish report.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.