Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs Vulcan Cyber comparison

Fortra and Vulcan Cyber, a Tenable Company are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Fortra is ranked #58, while Vulcan Cyber, a Tenable Company is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.4. Fortra holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Vulcan Cyber, a Tenable Company’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Vulcan Cyber, a Tenable Company users who would recommend it.

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Read 6 Fortra Tripwire IP360 reviews

1,492 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Vulcan Cyber

Read 11 Vulcan Cyber reviews

2,385 Views
1,455 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Vulcan Cyber

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Vulcan Cyber are competitors in the cybersecurity domain focusing on vulnerability management and remediation. Fortra Tripwire IP360 appears to have the upper hand in terms of comprehensive security coverage, while Vulcan Cyber leads in proactive remediation.

Features: Fortra Tripwire IP360 is noted for its security compliance and risk mitigation capabilities, providing extensive threat visibility and detailed reports. It supports comprehensive security posture across diverse environments. Vulcan Cyber features strong vulnerability prioritization, automated remediation which enhances operational efficiency, and integration options for streamlined processes.

Room for Improvement: Fortra Tripwire IP360 could benefit from more agile deployment solutions, enhanced integration with other systems, and improved user interface design. Vulcan Cyber could enhance its support options, expand threat intelligence data, and offer more customizable reporting features to better meet diverse business requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra Tripwire IP360 offers a traditional deployment model with responsive customer service, ensuring a reliable setup. Vulcan Cyber provides cloud-based deployment that maximizes scalability and flexibility, although it might require more initial adaptation for some businesses.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra Tripwire IP360 requires significant initial investment, promising robust ROI through long-term security enhancements. Vulcan Cyber offers flexible pricing and delivers quicker time-to-value, making it a cost-effective option for businesses seeking immediate impact with lower initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Vulcan Cyber Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Vulcan Cyber

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

58th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Vulcan Cyber

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th), Cloud Security Remediation (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Fortra Tripwire IP360 is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vulcan Cyber is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Vulcan Cyber	0.7%
Fortra Tripwire IP360	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Corey Cole

Service Coordinator - Technology Security at a government with 10,001+ employees

The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain

Only the administrator was using the product. He used it to read reports as part of our compliance programs. It wasn't heavily used by a lot of users. The tool comes in at a large scale, and we tried to scale it down. The scaling did not apply to us. It was neither difficult nor easy. I rate the scalability a five out of ten. We had some challenges while scaling it down. It could do 10,000 devices, and we wanted to use it for ten devices. The process was difficult and expensive. We did not need the product anymore.

Read full review

reviewer2649297

Technical Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlines prioritization but reporting needs enhancement

There are several areas needing improvement. The product helps, but the reporting relies heavily on Power BI. It is limited to graphical views and requires additional filtering, posing operational challenges. The inability to download specific asset details directly from the Power BI portal is a drawback, particularly for non-technical users, though it provides high-level executive summaries. The reporting model should be enhanced so that we have the flexibility to download. We have requested a few features, and they are open to accepting those requests. It needs ITSM improvements. It has out-of-the-box integration with ServiceNow, but the customer is using BMC Helix ITSM. We would like an integration with BMC Helix ITSM. When uploading CSV files without an out-of-the-box connector, duplicate entries for assets occur. We have already reported this to them, but we are not sure when they will fix it. It will significantly benefit if we can directly upload business context information from CMDB without manual merging efforts. It can also have automatic remediation capabilities through SCCM or something else.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."

"Tripwire IP360 helps me to discover most of the vulnerabilities, and I like the way that it prioritizes these vulnerabilities, as it allows me to focus on the most important ones first and then follow up with the rest."

"The company probably chose this solution because they thought that they would be getting the best bang for their buck."

"It has enhanced the security program by ensuring that all external-facing systems are scanned on a routine basis."

"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."

"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."

"This product detects vulnerabilities which exist in the environment, and provides enough information that allows for remediation, thereby securing the environment."

"Tripwire is one of the most mature in terms of companies, suites, support, everything, much more than any other product."

"I find the ability to consolidate information from multiple vulnerability scanners into a single source valuable."

"I was part of the initial deployment. It was pretty easy. To fully deploy, it took about three or four weeks."

"Vulcan Cyber has helped reduce our organization’s mean time to remediation."

"They recently upgraded their UI, which is great. It is user-friendly."

"The interface of Vulcan Cyber is intuitive with a lot of information about vulnerabilities, which helps in classifying and analyzing threats. We have a good view of assets and vulnerabilities. It helps to do good threat analysis because we can see exactly what the threat is and assess it accordingly."

"Vulcan Cyber is a very good tool."

"It has allowed us to bring together multiple sources of information from different signal sources into a single point."

"The automation capabilities using the Vulcan API platform or the API feature allow me to easily automate scripts and reports and schedule them."

More Vulcan Cyber pros

Cons

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"If you are looking for better reporting capabilities and vulnerability tracking over time for remediation purposes, then this is not the best solution."

"We would like to have better reporting capabilities and for them to be more granular."

"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."

"For IP360, unfortunately, scans for certain vulnerabilities often cause issues, as they are mainly false positive."

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."

"The reporting functions can use improvement."

"I would rate the tool between six and seven because there have been instances when the tool was down, and I couldn't access Cyber reports. Additionally, the Vulcan Cyber team made changes to the tool and did not notify us."

"The product helps, but the reporting relies heavily on Power BI. It is limited to graphical views and requires additional filtering, posing operational challenges."

"Improvements are needed in providing more concise details on how to apply remedies for particular vulnerabilities. I would like to have more information about the remedies for particular vulnerabilities so that we do not have to go through the CVE numbers and relevant pages to check for a particular vulnerability and its remedy."

"Improvements are needed in providing more concise details on how to apply remedies for particular vulnerabilities."

"Mainly, what I would like from them is more maintenance of the different connectors they have in the platform."

"It was a rough year in terms of setup. I had to set it up and onboard it. It was a significant effort from my side at least."

"An important area is performance and speed, as Vulcan Cyber often lacks speed when exporting reports."

"It would be extremely helpful to have a community group around the product."

More Vulcan Cyber cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the price compares well within the market."

"The product was expensive for us."

"Our leadership knows better about the pricing. As per my knowledge, which might not be accurate, its price can come down."

"Its pricing is quite fair compared to what is out there in the market, especially compared to the tool from Microsoft. It is a SaaS platform that has an annual cost, so it is something that is already used by many companies. It is quite affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

24%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vulcan Cyber?

I don't deal with the pricing of the solution. I'm not a part of that department.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vulcan Cyber?

One area for improvement is clarity in the results column of vulnerability reports. Currently, the path where the vulnerability lies is not clear, so Vulcan needs to work on specifying the correct ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vulcan Cyber?

I have been using the solution for more than six months. Essentially, any reporting I do for our internal Internet assets involves using Vulcan. The primary use of Vulcan is extracting the reports,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Nessus vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 7% of the time

BMC Helix Automation Console vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Competitors

Zafran Security vs Vulcan Cyber

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Vulcan Cyber

Compared 9% of the time

Nucleus Security vs Vulcan Cyber

Compared 7% of the time

Brinqa vs Vulcan Cyber

Compared 7% of the time

ESOF by TAC Security vs Vulcan Cyber

Compared 6% of the time

More Vulcan Cyber Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360

May 2026

Download Fortra Tripwire IP360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulcan Cyber

April 2026

Download Vulcan Cyber product report

Also Known As

IP360

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Fortra

Vulcan Cyber, a Tenable Company

Overview

Tripwire IP360 is a powerful vulnerability management solution that identifies and prioritizes network vulnerabilities for remediation. It is highly effective in scanning devices and applications, improving security posture, ensuring compliance, and managing risks.

Users value its detailed reporting, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other security tools for efficient security management.

Fortra

Vulcan Cyber centralizes data from multiple scanners for a unified view, helping prioritize crucial vulnerabilities efficiently and enabling advanced analytics through seamless integration with numerous tools.

Vulcan Cyber offers a holistic vulnerability and asset management platform, integrating findings from scanners such as Wiz and BlackRock and aligning with Jira and ServiceNow for efficient ticketing. It automates processes and enhances threat analysis through its intuitive interface, allowing users to manage vulnerabilities and assets efficiently, even in post-merger scenarios. Users can centralize scanner data, ensuring streamlined processes and comprehensive reporting. Despite its performance and interface speed challenges, Vulcan Cyber remains a valuable tool for managing risk-based notifications and stakeholder communications.

What features define Vulcan Cyber?

Data Centralization: Unifies scanner data into a single view for better vulnerability prioritization.
Integration Flexibility: Works with multiple tools, including Jira and ServiceNow, for enhanced analytics and process automation.
User-Friendly Interface: Displays asset and vulnerability details with options for data export criteria.
Threat Intelligence: Ingests, deduplicates, and consolidates data crucial for advanced threat analysis.

What benefits or ROI can users look for?

Comprehensive Reporting: Provides thorough reporting capabilities to inform remediation actions.
Streamlined Processes: Automates workflows to enhance efficiency and focus on critical vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Communication: Supports risk notifications and stakeholder updates across systems.
Integration Capabilities: Offers extensive tool integration for a cohesive security management experience.

Industries employing Vulcan Cyber for vulnerability management experience streamlined processes concerning scanner data centralization and asset assessment post-merger. Its integration with service solutions like Jira fosters efficient ticketing and communication, improving risk assessments and remediation actions.

Vulcan Cyber, a Tenable Company

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. Aon 10. Apple 11. ATT 12. Autodesk 13. Bank of America 14. Barclays 15. Bayer 16. Bechtel 17. BlackRock 18. Boeing 19. BNP Paribas 20. Cisco 21. CocaCola 22. Comcast 23. Dell 24. Deutsche Bank 25. eBay 26. ExxonMobil 27. FedEx 28. Ford 29. General Electric 30. Google 31. HP 32. IBM

Stitch Fix, Mandiant, Wealthsimple, Entrust, Anaplan, Deloitte, Origami Risk, Verana Health

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Vulcan Cyber

April 2026

Free Report: Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Vulcan Cyber

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Vulcan Cyber and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Vulcan Cyber report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.