Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. IBM Security Verify Access

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

10th

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (5th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (2nd)

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

15th

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (16th), Access Management (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is 3.7%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator	3.7%
IBM Security Verify Access	2.4%
Other	93.9%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Supports secure remote authentication and provides comprehensive user activity tracking

The most important feature is the security capability because it provides a substantial amount of security for admin-related activities. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator can be used from anywhere in the world, and the authenticator services function globally. This global accessibility is one of the critical advantages, particularly since admin features are critical and security is a real concern. With Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, secure usage of firewall services and related functions is achieved. A complete log of all users who access the authenticator setup is maintained. Monthly logs are reviewed to check for any unnoticed activities. Each authenticated user's complete activity history is recorded. This logging capability allows for providing access to more admin users while ensuring security is not compromised and all users can be monitored.

Read full review

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The most valuable feature is the OTP on the mobile phone."

"The integration into tools, including CI/CD pipelines, is easy and handy."

"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."

"The solution is an integral part of our security for our email network, and like I said, we'll begin using it for other cloud applications."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is the fact that you can utilize your tokens across the whole Fortinet fabric once you have the FortiAuthenticator."

"FortiAuthenticator is easy to use."

"The biggest advantages of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are that it's easy to deploy, easy to manage, and the GUI is a very strong interface."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator pros

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"IBM Security Verify Access, formerly known as ISAM, IBM Security Access Manager, now renamed to ISVA, integrates with central directory services for our organization and provides user management functionality."

"IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

Cons

"FortiAuthenticator should integrate with other applications."

"I would like to see support for more credential authentication protocols."

"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."

"I would like to see integration and customization capabilities with the end-user portal to solve authentication issues with diverse implementation scenarios."

"The speed of deployment on the cloud could be improved. It took a few days when it should have been just two days."

"For scalability, you need to size FortiAuthenticator properly. It's not 100%, maybe 80% on the scalable side."

"A better integration with other vendors."

"The only issue I encounter is that when not using FortiAuthenticator for an extended period, it's typical to encounter some obstacles in the configuration process that you need to address."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator cons

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more competitively priced."

"The solution is not very expensive."

"The licensing structure is cost-effective for us compared to some of the other solutions that have recurring monthly costs."

"The customers need to pay for licenses, and some pay on a yearly basis while others pay on a three-yearly or five-yearly basis. Also, it is not an expensive solution."

"I price of the solution is expensive."

"I would start off with a VM including the base license and scale according to the number of users you need to authenticate."

"It is usually cheap. Without a license, you can use some basic features. You can buy a 20-year license and implement the solution once."

"The platform provides a user-based pricing model rather than a subscription pricing model."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator pricing and cost advice

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

The pricing is rated at eight out of ten.

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Fortinet can make Fortinet FortiAuthenticator better by having a cloud version of it. Currently, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is only available for on-premises, and it is an on-premises solution. It...

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is primarily used for authenticating admin users, including remote admin use cases. Remote admin use cases utilize Fortinet FortiAuthenticator to securely authenticate a...

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

What is your primary use case for IBM Security Access Manager?

We are still using the IBM BPM platform to automate the processes for our organization.I generally use Microsoft Project for project planning and schedule management, especially in relation to Orac...

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

My current domain is leading project development, overseeing both technical and functional areas in process automation and orchestration, along with the hands-on implementation of process automatio...

Cisco Duo vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiToken vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Product Reports

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Download Fortinet FortiAuthenticator product report

IBM Security Verify Access

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Also Known As

FortiAuthenticator

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Overview

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator enhances security through intuitive management and integration capabilities, offering two-factor authentication and seamless connectivity with FortiGate, LDAP, and AD. It provides robust OTP features and operates efficiently across diverse environments.

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is designed to streamline two-factor and multi-factor authentication processes across diverse network environments. Its seamless integration with Active Directory optimizes secure user management and enhances VPN security. It facilitates multi-domain authentication and serves as a comprehensive identity and access management tool. Organizations leverage its capabilities for VPN and network access while utilizing tokens for increased security. Its single sign-on feature aids in simplifying identity management and authorization, supporting extensive network and application security demands. However, improvements could be made to its outdated interface, pricing strategy, and better integration with third-party applications. Streamlined command line configurations and bolstered technical support would enhance user experience further.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Simple FSSO configuration: Provides easy setup for secure single sign-on.
Flexible two-factor authentication: Offers varied authentication methods to enhance security.
Seamless integration: Works effortlessly with LDAP, AD, and FortiGate systems.
Intuitive management: Features a user-friendly interface for efficient management.
Robust OTP features: Supports diverse credentials for One-Time Passwords.

What benefits should users expect from Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Enhanced security: Through detailed logs and strong authentication measures.
Cost-effective management: Reduces administrative overhead and operational costs.
Global operation support: Provides reliable service worldwide.
Centralized management: Increases efficiency across devices and platforms.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and education, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is implemented to secure sensitive data and streamline access management. Its integration capabilities support compliance requirements, while its authentication features ensure authorized access across platforms, enhancing both security and operational efficiency.

Fortinet

IBM Security Verify Access offers adaptable access management with multi-factor authentication, seamless protocol integration, and strong user management, suitable for cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Security Verify Access provides multi-factor authentication, seamless integration with protocols like SAML and OAuth, and features including password vaults and single sign-on. Its adaptable nature allows for deployment both in cloud and on-premises settings. Users appreciate its quick setup, reliable authorization, and efficient user management, especially when integrated with Active Directory. The intuitive interface enhances security with mobile features like QR code enrollment, making it suitable for diverse environments. However, cloud deployment could be simpler, and the interface could use enhancements for better ease. Onboarding applications and support availability need improvements, and configuration for OIDC and OAuth should mature. More comprehensive documentation and simplified installation are also needed, along with automation to reduce resource consumption.

What are the key features of IBM Security Verify Access?

Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust multi-layered security.
Integration with Protocols: Works with SAML and OAuth for seamless connectivity.
Password Vaults: Secure storage for user credentials.
Single Sign-On: Streamlines access across platforms.
Active Directory Integration: Ensures efficient user management.
Mobile Features: Includes QR code enrollment for enhanced security.

What benefits or ROI can users expect to find in the reviews?

Rapid Setup: Quick deployment in cloud and on-premises environments.
Reliable Authorization: Trustworthy access control and management.
Security Enhancements: Through multi-factor authentication and mobile features.
Streamlined Processes: Simplified access management with single sign-on.

IBM Security Verify Access is widely used in the banking and educational sectors for access management, supporting activities like single sign-on and control across different user groups. Many in these industries utilize it for customer authentication and integrate it with mobile systems to enhance security. Its adaptability allows it to serve complex needs, particularly useful in environments such as universities and financial institutions.

IBM

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

POST Luxembourg

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. IBM Security Verify Access