Fortinet FortiAP vs Omada Access Points comparison

Fortinet and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Fortinet is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while TP-Link is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.6. Fortinet holds a 6.2% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiAP

Read 16 Fortinet FortiAP reviews

3,085 Views
3,085 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,354 Views
3,320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiAP

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Omada Access Points and Fortinet FortiAP compete in the wireless networking space. Omada Access Points are favored for their cost-effectiveness, while Fortinet FortiAP is seen as superior due to its robust features.

Features: Omada Access Points offer seamless integration and centralized management, making them ideal for small to medium businesses. They excel in wired and wireless connectivity and ease of management. Fortinet FortiAPs include advanced security features like threat detection and prevention, seamless integration with other Forti products, and centralized control through a single console.

Room for Improvement: Omada Access Points could enhance their security features and expand advanced monitoring tools to match enterprise needs. They may also benefit from expanding the mesh networking capabilities. Fortinet FortiAPs could work on simplifying their complex setup for less technical users, improve their cost structure, and provide better interoperability with non-Fortinet products.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points provide straightforward deployment with an intuitive setup process and dependable customer support. Fortinet FortiAPs offer a reliable deployment process with extensive technical support, beneficial for demanding environments requiring detailed service.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points are notable for their low-cost setup and high ROI, owing to affordable pricing and minimal maintenance costs. Fortinet FortiAPs, despite a higher initial investment, deliver substantial ROI through their advanced security features, appealing to enterprises focusing on performance and security enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiAP

Ranking in Wireless LAN

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiAP is 6.2%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.1%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fortinet FortiAP	6.2%
Omada Access Points	4.1%
Other	89.7%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Shahnawaz Nusrat

Head Of Technical Operations at ITE

Has simplified wireless integration while needing better throughput and captive portal features

The product can be improved depending on the model selected as per requirements. Support is good and throughput is good. What we need to do is select a better product as per our requirement and environment. If proper working is done in terms of wireless heat map or radio connectivity in our environment, I believe it's good. There is always a chance to improve. Throughput can be better in terms of other vendors, but currently, it's working fine. One feature that I still need to explore is the captive portal. When we deploy a unit in a public environment, users need to sign in with a pop-up box to connect.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution is very high."

"The pricing is reasonable for what it offers."

"The solution supports recent security components like encryption or hashing algorithms. We can control the APs from FortiGate Firewalls and integrate those APs into FortiGate. You don't have to purchase a separate controller for it."

"FortiAP's integration using SSID configuration for the input/output makes deploying permission rules easier."

"The most valuable aspect of Fortinet FortiAP is the support."

"Fortinet FortiAP provides value for money, and I can quantify the savings at about 80%."

"I would give FortiAP a rating of ten out of ten so far."

"I always recommend to customers who have a FortiGate firewall to choose Fortinet FortiAP instead of deploying any other wireless controller or OEM because it provides a single posture of security and a single management console, is easy to use, easy to deploy, and offers central management with FortiGate."

More Fortinet FortiAP pros

"Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"This product is easy to use."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"FortiAP is very good in an indoor environment, but we are struggling with the outdoor environment."

"There could be constraints where a product can't be scaled further without purchasing a new model."

"There is nothing that particularly comes to mind for improvement."

"The wireless functionality is not the best."

"The security integration between the network and firewall has room for improvement."

"FortiAP could be a little cheaper."

"There is room for improvement in the product by expanding the number of SSIDs that can be broadcast."

"I would like to have automation capabilities that would help us reduce the configuration steps."

More Fortinet FortiAP cons

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We purchased perpetual licensing, and additional costs may vary depending on the services acquired from Fortinet."

"If I compare it with the other enterprise products, the price is good."

"Fortinet FortiAP offers a more cost-effective solution compared to Palo Alto and Check Point."

"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I would rate FortiAP a six."

"The product is available at a very comfortable price for my company compared to the other products available in the market. The prices of products from Meraki and Aruba are high compared to those of Fortinet."

"FortiAP is more expensive than some other options."

"The devices under Fortinet are not expensive. The solution's licensing part is expensive."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FortiAP?

If we have FortiClient installed on multiple devices, it is seamless to connect with FortiAP. It supports passwordless authentication as well. That is a great thing about it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiAP?

Fortinet FortiAP is affordable, not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FortiAP?

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Access Points vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 24% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 12% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 12% of the time

More Fortinet FortiAP Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 16% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAP

October 2025

Download Fortinet FortiAP product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Fortinet FortiAP provides wireless network access for industries such as banking, healthcare, and logistics. It enhances connectivity with FortiGate and FortiSwitch, ensuring secure data exchange in settings like offices and malls.

Fortinet FortiAP is integral for managing connected devices across sectors. It integrates seamlessly with Fortinet products, enhancing security and connectivity. Users benefit from a unified console that simplifies configuration and monitoring without additional controllers. The support for passwordless authentication and cloud visibility adds value, while its use in environments like shopping centers and offices facilitates secure data sharing and access.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiAP?

Integration with FortiGate and FortiAnalyzer: Simplifies network management and monitoring.
Passwordless Authentication: Enhances security and accessibility.
Cloud Dashboard: Provides comprehensive visibility over network activities.
Direct Control from FortiGate: Eliminates the need for separate controllers.
SSID Customization: Supports tailoring of wireless access.

What benefits should users expect from Fortinet FortiAP?

Efficient Network Management: Centralized control and configuration simplify operations.
Comprehensive Reporting: Transparent insights for improved decision-making.
Secure Access: Protects data through advanced security measures.
Seamless Connectivity: Improves user experience with simplified networking.

In industries like banking and healthcare, Fortinet FortiAP is deployed to enhance network security and provide reliable access. Retailers leverage its capabilities in shopping centers, while warehouses benefit from its reliable connectivity to support seamless operations. Managed service providers use it to deliver tailored solutions, ensuring effective network segmentation and coverage.

Fortinet

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Free Report: Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.