Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Juniper Mist Edge comparison

Forcepoint and Juniper are both solutions in the WAN Edge category. Forcepoint is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.2, while Juniper is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Forcepoint holds a 2.4% mindshare in WE, compared to Juniper’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Juniper users who would recommend it.
Forcepoint Next Generation ...
Read 44 Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall reviews
  • 706 Views
  • 2 Comparison Views
78% willing to recommend
Juniper Mist Edge
Read 4 Juniper Mist Edge reviews
  • 432 Views
  • 0 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Juniper Mist Edge are both robust solutions in network security and edge networking. Users tend to favor Juniper Mist Edge overall for its innovative AI-driven features despite its higher price point.

Features: Users highlight Forcepoint’s deep packet inspection, integrated IPS, and robust VPN capabilities as valuable features. For Juniper Mist Edge, the standout features include AI-driven operations, superior network automation, and simplified management.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Forcepoint could benefit from a more intuitive interface, streamlined update processes, and enhanced reporting capabilities. For Juniper Mist Edge, feedback indicates the need for better documentation, customer support enhancements, and improvements in integration with third-party systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint users report a straightforward deployment process but slow customer service. Juniper Mist Edge users find deployment rapid due to its AI features but note occasional delays in high-level technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint is noted for its competitive pricing and solid ROI over time, with users feeling they get substantial value post-deployment. Juniper Mist Edge's higher initial setup cost is acknowledged, but users believe the long-term ROI justifies the investment due to its advanced capabilities and operational efficiencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Juniper Mist Edge Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Juniper Mist Edge
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Next Generation ...
Ranking in WAN Edge
9th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (24th), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (10th)
Juniper Mist Edge
Ranking in WAN Edge
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the WAN Edge category, the mindshare of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is 2.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper Mist Edge is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
WAN Edge
 

Featured Reviews

OusaidAbaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides decent protection for the LAN but complicated interface
We had some licensing issues with its web filtering capabilities. That's why we migrated our web filtering to Cisco Umbrella. Moreover, the interface is complicated. It's difficult to locate all the necessary menus and functions. For example, one of the many issues is with SSH. Even now, we haven't successfully opened the port to connect using SSH mode when we want to change the configuration. It's like a black box—not very open to changes and customization. It's simply not easy to configure. There are other problems, too. For example regarding Forcepoint's Websense component. We had a lot of problems managing the web settings within Websense. That's why we migrated to Cisco Umbrella for cloud-based web filtering. It's not that Forcepoint is inherently bad. The issue is that it's not user-friendly. It is not easy to use. The developers need to redesign the interface (GUI) for better management. It is very difficult to manage. For example, simple actions require too many clicks compared to FortiGate or Palo Alto. That's the main problem.
Read full review
Raihan Hossain - PeerSpot reviewer
The AI-driven solution has enhanced connectivity with seamless remote management
I primarily use Juniper Wi-Fi because I need a smooth Wi-Fi solution. I address my needs by opting for Juniper, which is a reliable product. I often require a dependable product, and this is why I choose Juniper. It is worth noting that the price of Juniper is quite high. However, for a single…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We find the product to be stable and reliable in terms of performance."
"One of the most valuable features is having the ability to cluster multiple firewalls even if they are different versions."
"The feature that we like the most about Forcepoint is that we know the technology and have confidence in it. We can have several functionalities to simplify operations and management. We can combine functionalities like log ownership to review the number of devices in the infrastructure."
"They offer templates that provide detailed reports categorized by user, device, and internal network access."
"The people we deal with is a local partner in Cambodia and we can get good support from them."
"It is a scalable product. I know a customer who has deployed more than 4,000 firewalls in a single deployment."
"Forcepoint is a complete package because it has network and systems applications. Other firewalls are only for the network."
"The simplicity of the solution is its most valuable asset. It's very user-friendly."
More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall pros
"Juniper is a remote and AI-enhanced product."
"Juniper Mist Edge is valuable for its ability to troubleshoot and configure more things compared to Meraki."
"The visibility of the information that's available about APs through their cloud portal and some of the AI features are most valuable."
"The most valuable aspect of Mist Edge lies in its ability to provide comprehensive visibility into all network packets."
"Juniper Mist Edge provides better support for medium-sized businesses."
"Juniper's technical support is highly responsive."
 

Cons

"You do need knowledge of the solution in order to set the product up properly."
"It is really hard to work with their customer support. For example, unlike Fortinet where you can escalate an issue and quickly get responses from the development team, Forcepoint's process seems slow and challenging."
"My experience with this Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall wasn't very pleasant due to its complexity. For example, the firewall loses some features when working in a cluster, which is a huge challenge. It caused me several weeks to solve an issue to make the VPN work, even after opening several cases with support. Also, the debug, which should provide essential knowledge about everything going on, the flow of traffic, and how the engine works, wasn't very informative in identifying the issue."
"The initial setup of the Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has areas that are difficult."
"When it comes to a complex deployment, the rules, firewall features, SD-WAN core features, and auto-scaling can cause the device to be not quite stable."
"They should have a GUI on the product itself, not a separate management tool to be used on the management server or on a server to be used to manage the file. It should be all in one device. The device should be controlled through its own GUI. They also have to improve the learning center and the documents as the documents don't really help."
"In larger companies with extensive infrastructure, retrieving logs for a longer period of time can sometimes take a bit longer than desired."
"Next Generation Firewall's configuration could be improved."
More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall cons
"I experience a lot of stability issues, so the rating is eight out of ten."
"I would like to see improvements in ensuring government compliance for Mist Edge."
"The one area that we're specifically looking into is their outdoor APs. The development of their outdoor APs is lagging as compared to their internal APs."
"The product needs an update, particularly in price, as it deters many customers, including myself, from using it despite its convenience and effectiveness."
"Juniper Mist Edge can sometimes have a delay in information updating."
"Juniper Mist Edge can sometimes have a delay in information updating, which could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have just a subscription for the cloud, and this license is great. The license is so good."
"We have found the price could be reduced. It is a little expensive."
"The big advantage of this solution is that we can select the right model for our requirements, which is not too expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"I believe the licensing fee is for one year, three years, and five years, or something like that. If you wants to increase the support level from a simpler level to platinum, I think that there's a cost. There are differences between every kind of support, but I don't know the numbers."
"Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is reasonable, it is priced the same as other firewalls."
"The pricing of the solution is normally competitive with other products."
"We would love to take other solution from Forcepoint, but unfortunately the price is too high. That's why we are not considering using Forcepoing for our proxy and DLB. They have a very good DLB, but the matter in the end is the cost."
More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall pricing and cost advice
"I believe we're getting some good discounts. We're paying less than $500 per AP. I don't know the annual maintenance cost."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Edge solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
14%
Retailer
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?
The product's initial setup phase is easy.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?
The licensing model is dependent on negotiation skills, but there is room for improvement. The costs can be high since additional features require separate licenses.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?
The licensing model should be more flexible. I recommend that additional features be included in a single license to avoid the need for extra licensing costs. Additionally, there are performance li...
See all answers
What do you like most about Juniper Mist Edge?
The most valuable aspect of Mist Edge lies in its ability to provide comprehensive visibility into all network packets.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Mist Edge?
The cost is comparable to Meraki.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Juniper Mist Edge?
The product needs an update, particularly in price, as it deters many customers, including myself, from using it despite its convenience and effectiveness. Due to the high cost, not all customers c...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Compared 32% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Compared 20% of the time
Check Point NGFW vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Check Point NGFW vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Compared 12% of the time
Sophos XG vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Sophos XG vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Compared 5% of the time
OPNsense vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
OPNsense vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Compared 4% of the time
More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Competitors
Fortinet FortiGate vs Juniper Mist Edge Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Juniper Mist Edge
Compared 71% of the time
Juniper Contrail SD-WAN vs Juniper Mist Edge Logo
Juniper Contrail SD-WAN vs Juniper Mist Edge
Compared 29% of the time
More Juniper Mist Edge Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
June 2025
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall reportDownload Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall product report
Buyer's Guide
WAN Edge
May 2025
Juniper Mist Edge reportDownload Juniper Mist Edge product report
 

Also Known As

Forcepoint NGFW, Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall, McAfee Network Security Platform, Intel Security Network Security Platform
No data available
 

Overview

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is a versatile and comprehensive solution for perimeter security, offering features such as SD-WAN, IPS, VPN, and cloud or on-premises subscription keys. It is preferred by many clients over Cisco and is used for obligation redundancy, VPN access, and as the main point of security in infrastructure. 

The product is praised for its simplicity, flexibility, complete feature set, scalability, and central management capabilities. Other valuable features include IPS, firewall, sandbox, application control, filtering, security management center, connectivity, and integration capabilities.

Forcepoint

Juniper Mist Edge extends our microservices architecture to the campus, bringing agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge. The Juniper Mist Edge uses the Juniper Mist Cloud and its distributed software architecture for scalable and resilient operations, management, troubleshooting, and analytics — all without the need for legacy wireless controllers.

Juniper
 

Sample Customers

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
One Energy, UST Global, i3D.net, Hyland
Buyer's Guide
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Juniper Mist Edge
June 2025
Free Report: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Juniper Mist Edge
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Juniper Mist Edge and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Juniper Mist Edge report.
See our list of best WAN Edge vendors.

We monitor all WAN Edge reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.