No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Fivetran vs Integrate.io Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran
Ranking in Data Integration
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (8th)
Integrate.io Platform
Ranking in Data Integration
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Data Observability (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 1.8%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Integrate.io Platform is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fivetran1.8%
Integrate.io Platform0.5%
Other97.7%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot
Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors
I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.
PG
Technical Consultant at a recreational facilities/services company with 11-50 employees
No-code pipelines have accelerated sales data sync and now support faster team onboarding
Integrate.io Platform has helped simplify my data pipelines, as it is really good with Salesforce sync. This has been our main feature that we have consistently used, and it has really reduced our time in terms of syncing our database with Salesforce, which used to take a lot of time. The best features Integrate.io Platform offers include the no-code, low-code feature, which has been really good for us, especially for new developers to come in and get started. Additionally, the rich connectors that the platform has are very important because sometimes connections may not be compatible with others. The CDC, real-time under 60-second database replication, has also helped us a lot. No-code, low-code has had the biggest impact for my team. This has reduced the training part considerably. We don't have to do a lot of training, and not just senior developers, but junior developers can also contribute.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."
"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."
"Fivetran's technical support is really good, and if you're on their enterprise plan, they usually respond within an hour and keep you continuously updated on progress."
"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."
"It has improved the way our organization functions."
"Its arrays are powerful enough to handle migrations even when the replication is happening in the background, without causing any trouble with the ongoing traffic."
"Overall, I would rate Fivetran nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."
"Integrate.io Platform has helped simplify my data pipelines, as it is really good with Salesforce sync."
 

Cons

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."
"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."
"Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs."
"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."
"I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations."
"Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results."
"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."
"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."
"Customer support could be better. We often get replies that are delayed, and sometimes there is a lot of back and forth."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."
"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."
"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."
"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."
"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."
"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."
"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."
"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
886,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
Construction Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Wholesaler/Distributor
10%
Performing Arts
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise16
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?
As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...
Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?
I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...
How much traffic can HVR Software handle?
As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...
What needs improvement with Integrate.io Platform?
Integrate.io Platform can be improved with better error logging and debugging, as sometimes the error logs are very minimal and not very self-explanatory. The error logs can be more detailed, which...
What is your primary use case for Integrate.io Platform?
My main use case for Integrate.io Platform would be to simplify my data pipelines. We have been struggling with consistent data pipelines, and I wanted to make it easier for new developers to pick ...
What advice do you have for others considering Integrate.io Platform?
My advice to others looking into using Integrate.io Platform is to go for it and try it out. If people try it, they would appreciate it and see that this is something that works for them. Everyone ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
DRIVEN APM, Xplenty
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure
GAP, Samsung, REA Group, TellApart, Pintrest, Expedia, CapitalOne, Oportun, Hotels.com, HomeAway, CommonwealthBank, D&B, DeerWalk
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Qlik and others in Data Integration. Updated: March 2026.
886,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.