Field Effect Covalence vs SentinelOne Vigilance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Binary Defense Logo
1,532 views|179 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Field Effect Logo
1,505 views|499 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SentinelOne Logo
5,098 views|3,495 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Field Effect Covalence and SentinelOne Vigilance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect Covalence vs. SentinelOne Vigilance Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One of the main benefits of Binary Defense MDR is the ability to easily meet with their support team to discuss any issues we encounter.""The most valuable features are the SIEM and the ticketing function; the latter is very smooth and easy to read and understand. We don't have any issues looking at the ticketing information when we're trying to identify what's going on.""The biggest aspect for us is that they are able to conform to our environment and utilize our tools. That way, we still maintain ownership of all the data and access to the applications, and we never lose control of the ability to run the solution ourselves if we need to.""With Binary Defense, we don't just get an alert, but also a detailed rundown of why they're alerting us on it. They tell us what was executed, or the username, script, or IP. That way, we're not wasting time investigating.""The customization has been the most valuable aspect and was really the reason we ended up selecting Binary Defense. They worked with us to provide exactly the level of support, features, response, and collaboration we needed.""Binary Defense's most valuable feature is the 24/7 monitoring and threat hunting. Their team checks the latest breaches and how they're done.""The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians.""The best part about Binary Defense MDR is that it runs on everything, and they keep an eye on things 24/7."

More Binary Defense MDR Pros →

"The AROs have been incredibly helpful.""I get alerts if there's malicious activity or restrictions, should they any suspicious activity emerge.""The most valuable aspects of Covalence for me are the exceptional customer service and the support from the dedicated team.""Hackers are trying to breach a business when they least expect it - that's often at night, weekends, and holidays. Covalence never sleeps or misses a second of monitoring.""I appreciate the "set it and forget it" nature of Field Effect Covalence.""I like how comprehensive Field Effect Covalence is.""The most valuable aspect of Field Effect Covalence is its ability to continuously monitor for and identify potential threats.""The most valuable features are Action Recommendations of Observations, which keep us informed about existing vulnerabilities so we can proactively update our endpoints and those of our customers against potential threats."

More Field Effect Covalence Pros →

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""SentinelOne is a comprehensive solution for protecting SOAP-based web services and AWS-based cloud infrastructure.""Stable solution for protecting, deploying, and managing endpoints, and comes with valuable features such as behavioral analytics and machine learning.""The initial setup process was straightforward.""SentinelOne Vigilance has very good detection.""The most valuable feature is protection against ransomware and malware.""The best feature of this solution is the third-party management aspect. An external company oversees the tool's management and monitors the data it generates. If the EDR detects suspicious activity, it will react accordingly and take necessary actions, such as blocking a device.""The endpoint security software is great."

More SentinelOne Vigilance Pros →

Cons
"We found a couple of bugs in the user interface.""If I were shopping for an MDR solution today, I would not only look for a company that has the ability to alert, detect, and remediate, but also the ability to integrate vulnerability management. That's a big thing that they're lacking today.""We found that an earlier version of the agent had high memory usage and that was a bit concerning, but we raised the concern with their support team and they immediately replied that they had noticed the same thing and had a candidate fix already available... it totally fixed the issue.""I would like to get more reports from Binary Defense about what they're blocking.""Binary Defense MDR could be even better with additional features, like automatic scans and file quarantine.""It's hard to think of anything that they need to improve on, but just to point out something, I would like to see them provide advanced XDR.""I don't find any downside to them, but if I have to put one, it would be consistent manpower or staffing. The only area where the solution can be improved is going to be with people. As they grow, they are struggling with the same thing that every other company is, which is getting talent and getting that talent to stay, but they've just revised their tiering system to go from a flat analyst and manager to a three-tier solution where it goes through two or three before it gets elevated. That seems to have worked out well, so if one level misses it, the next one picks it up, and it works out fine.""We should be able to isolate devices faster. They should shorten the time between clicking on a device to contain it and carrying out the action. That would be a welcome improvement."

More Binary Defense MDR Cons →

"I have had a couple of challenges around updates to the agents where it seems it doesn't automatically replace older versions.""I would like Covalence to include patching.""They put too much detail into the emails.""There are tags for security threats, but I only view them. I do not action anything. I just see what is happening. Sometimes, they are a little bit vague, and I am unsure what they mean, so I leave that to the IT experts. Overall, we are quite satisfied with their product and how it is working.""I'd love the price to be a little bit less.""Field Effect Covalence could benefit from enhancing its packing slip process.""I would like Covalence to implement patch management as well.""I'd like improved visibility into the backend data where logs are stored, along with integrations with a wider range of products."

More Field Effect Covalence Cons →

"SentinelOne Vigilance doesn't actively monitor incoming emails or offer an email plugin for Outlook.""When upgrades are required on the server, you need to almost remove SentinelOne Vigilance completely off the system. We put SentinelOne Vigilance on silence for the monitor mode, but we were having trouble upgrading the server. I had to remove SentinelOne Vigilance completely from the server, but that meant that all the previous logs of attacks I wanted to look at on the server were gone. This is one thing they need to improve, they need better compatibility with the Microsoft Windows service. I should not have to remove the agent completely to upgrade the service.""It is not easy to remove the customer without the dashboard.""The solution's memory forensics capabilities and hard disk capacities are quite basic.""Occasionally during an update, customers may temporarily be without protection until the upgrade is complete.""The process to replicate exclusions is not user-friendly.""My customers who use the tool mostly want a summary of the monitoring activities of the product in a report form...t can be useful for our customers to identify the threats and incidents encountered by the product.""My only complaint is that the knowledge base is not accessible to the customer."

More SentinelOne Vigilance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution's price is spot on; if anything, it's slightly below the norm for most services. Compared to building the same team internally, it would cost more to create the same amount of capability than what we get from an external team. Price-wise, Binary Defense is in a great spot."
  • "From the initial cost that Binary Defense came in with, we pared it down quite a bit over the course of 30 or 60 days. My leadership would say that their cost was high, but realistically, they were in line with the market."
  • "The pricing is on target. Working with their sales team on pricing negotiations was a pleasant process. They were very respectful of the constraints we had and I feel that we're paying a fair price."
  • "It's valued at the right price. Even with the number of endpoints we have, we don't feel that it's a lot more than any competitor. In fact, it might be less expensive when you look at the fact that you're getting a full flex SOC out of it along with the tools."
  • "Binary Defense has changed its pricing model from being primarily based on the volume of data to one based on escalations and incidents they handle."
  • "Binary Defense MDR is priced competitively and may be slightly lower than CrowdStrike."
  • "After we acquired this platform, we met with a number of different vendors. Binary Defense came in with a proposal that was surprisingly affordable. In fact, we were able to recoup the cost of their services within a short period of time. This is because Binary Defense is able to provide the same level of security as a team of two or three in-house analysts but at a fraction of the cost. As a result, Binary Defense is saving us an estimated $250,000 to $300,000 per year."
  • "The pricing isn't that bad, it's very competitive. I don't feel that it's over-priced and I don't feel that it's under-priced."
  • More Binary Defense MDR Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the solution is high."
  • "Covalence is cost-effective."
  • "We were particularly impressed with their pricing model, which charges per user rather than per system."
  • "Although Covalence is expensive, it provides good value for the price."
  • "The pricing is comparable to what else is out there."
  • "We're currently enrolled in the volume package, which offers tiered pricing based on usage."
  • "While Field Effect Covalence's pricing seems competitive for the market, the biggest hurdle lies in the lack of dedicated security budgets within many organizations."
  • "The licensing model itself is solid, but we're ironing out some inconsistencies in how customer profiles are configured."
  • More Field Effect Covalence Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing cost depends on the number of connected devices and whether you purchase additional services."
  • "I give the cost a three out of ten."
  • "I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten since it is a very highly-priced solution."
  • "I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten since it is really expensive, but it is well worth what my company gets."
  • "The solution’s pricing is very reasonable."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "SentinelOne Vigilance is priced in a normal range."
  • "The tool's pricing is slightly cheaper than other alternatives. It's not just about licensing costs; because we already have it implemented, we can save money on deployment and initial setup. Additionally, SentinelOne Vigilance is slightly cheaper in licensing, maybe around 10-15 percent cheaper."
  • More SentinelOne Vigilance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians.
    Top Answer:Binary Defense is fairly priced. I would say that Binary Defense is flexible in negotiating and tailoring a solution… more »
    Top Answer:The only area I see for improvement with Binary Defense is their service portal. It could benefit from some… more »
    Top Answer:It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.
    Top Answer:It is a little pricey. It is a little on the high end, but we are continuing to use it. We signed the contract and have… more »
    Top Answer:There are tags for security threats, but I only view them. I do not action anything. I just see what is happening… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance, which is very important for us in our company.
    Top Answer:My customers who use the tool mostly want a summary of the monitoring activities of the product in a report form, which… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Binary Defense Vision, Binary Defense Managed Detection and Response, Binary Defense Managed Detection & Response
    Learn More
    Overview

    Binary Defense provides a Managed Detection and Response service using an Open XDR strategy that detects and isolates threats early in the attack lifecycle. Expert security analysts in the Binary Defense Security Operations Center leverage an attacker’s mindset, monitoring your environments for security events 24x7x365 and acting as an extension of your security teams. When a security event occurs, Binary Defense analysts triage, disposition, and prioritize the event. Analysts conduct full kill chain analysis and supply tactical and strategic mitigation recommendations to your security team with the goal of increasing your organization’s security posture against the latest adversary threats.

    Visit us online at https://www.binarydefense.com

    Get strong security without the complexity. Covalence deploys in minutes to identify vulnerabilities and threats, and keep you safe from attacks with its revolutionary, holistic approach to cyber security.

    Reduce time to protection and minimize risk exposure with continuous threat monitoring and response from SentinelOne.

    Sample Customers
    Securitas USA, Black Hills Energy, Lincoln Electric,The J.M. Smuckers Company, New York Community Bank, State of Connecticut, NCR
    Information Not Available
    Norwegian Airlines, TGI Fridays, AVX, FIMBank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company33%
    Wholesaler/Distributor8%
    Insurance Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company45%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company53%
    Non Profit7%
    Government5%
    Hospitality Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Sports Company10%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization37%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise45%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business91%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business70%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise20%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business68%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise44%
    Large Enterprise30%
    Buyer's Guide
    Field Effect Covalence vs. SentinelOne Vigilance
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect Covalence vs. SentinelOne Vigilance and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Field Effect Covalence is ranked 5th in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 21 reviews while SentinelOne Vigilance is ranked 4th in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 18 reviews. Field Effect Covalence is rated 9.2, while SentinelOne Vigilance is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Field Effect Covalence writes "Helps to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and improve our security team's efficiency and security posture ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Vigilance writes "Very easy to use with multiple options for licensing and scaling". Field Effect Covalence is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, Huntress, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting and Blackpoint Cyber MDR, whereas SentinelOne Vigilance is most compared with Huntress, Blackpoint Cyber MDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR and ConnectWise SIEM. See our Field Effect Covalence vs. SentinelOne Vigilance report.

    See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.