No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

F5 Rules for AWS WAF
Ranking in Business Rules Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (14th)
Fortinet Managed Rules for ...
Ranking in Business Rules Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Rules Management category, the mindshare of F5 Rules for AWS WAF is 1.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is 2.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Rules Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF2.0%
F5 Rules for AWS WAF1.9%
Other96.1%
Business Rules Management
 

Featured Reviews

Vibin Thomas - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
Advanced protection has reduced web attacks and improves application performance and operations
One area where F5 Rules for AWS WAF can be improved is in simplifying the tuning process. While F5 Rules for AWS WAF is powerful, fine-tuning it to match specific application behavior can sometimes be complex and time-consuming, especially for teams without deep WAF expertise. Another improvement could be enhanced visibility and reporting. Although AWS WAF provides logs, having more intuitive and built-in dashboards or clearer categorization of rule triggers would make it easier to quickly identify and analyze attack patterns. Additionally, expanding the capabilities around bot management and behavior analysis would be beneficial compared to some dedicated bot management solutions. More advanced detection techniques could further strengthen the protection against sophisticated automated traffic. Finally, providing more predefined templates or best practice recommendations for different application types would help speed up the deployment and reduce the initial configuration effort.
Vivek Patoliya - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Indic
Automation has strengthened bot control and web traffic security across our cloud workloads
One of the best features of Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is the automation of rule updates, which significantly reduces the need for manual intervention. The managed rule sets provide effective coverage for common OWASP Top 10 threats, SQL injection attempts, and malicious bot activity, helping strengthen baseline application security. Bot control and traffic filtering capabilities have been particularly useful in ensuring that incoming traffic is legitimate, improving visibility into request behavior and reducing unwanted or suspicious activity. The ability to quickly apply policies such as geo‑blocking and IP reputation checks through AWS WAF integration also saves time and simplifies daily operations. Overall, these features help balance strong security with lower operational overhead.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I advise anyone looking for a great tool to secure their public-facing applications to start using F5 Rules for AWS WAF."
"F5 Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted us by improving our web application security without adding too much operational overhead."
"F5 Rules for AWS WAF's OWASP protection and bot protection have reduced attacks on my applications by 72 to 90%."
"F5 Rules for AWS WAF should be highly recommended for AI applications, as security is a major concern, and using F5 helps prevent security issues and stabilizes organizations and applications."
"F5 Rules for AWS WAF is definitely recommended. It is a good tool for anyone to try and see if it matches their use case, and it is something that an organization can really benefit from."
"F5 Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted our organization for security through the implementation of traffic rules in our application."
"In the past few years, we have zero security incidents, indicating a return on investment."
"Overall, the combination of reduced manual effort, improved security posture, and better application performance has delivered a strong return on investment."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization by improving application security by blocking threats automatically, reducing manual effort, and ensuring consistent protection with real-time updates."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization mainly by controlling the use of bots, as hackers and even ethical hackers feed data using them, helping us ensure that the traffic we are receiving is genuine and allowing us to analyze request times for each packet for great insight while automation saves time, lets me set geolocation rules, and track source IP behavior, which is very helpful for my organization."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF provides positive feedback by protecting web applications and API protection while blocking advanced threats."
"The best features Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF offers include regularly updated rules which incorporate the latest threat intelligence, logs, alerts, and the ability to block malicious requests that we have found on this WAF."
"Overall, Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF help us strengthen security, reduce operational overhead, and improve deployment speed, making our WAF management more efficient and scalable."
"Since using Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF, financial losses have gradually decreased, and whenever a hacker was trying to exploit the system and asking for a bounty, that threat was completely eliminated."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF positively impacts my organization by providing protection, as I have seen improved security, easier management, and fewer attacks due to limiting the requests, and the service has protected many things from man-in-the-middle attacks, denial of service, and SQL server attacks."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF offers the best features by protecting my servers and blocking unauthorized access while also giving me the flexibility to only enable allowed access."
 

Cons

"F5 Rules for AWS WAF could be improved with deeper integration with Infrastructure as Code tools like Terraform for simplification, as well as more AI-driven recommendations for rules tuning to reduce false positives and better dashboards for visibility at the CXO level."
"From an improvement standpoint, one area where F5 Rules for AWS WAF could improve is in simplifying policy management and making advanced configurations more intuitive, especially for teams that are newer to enterprise WAF technologies."
"F5 Rules for AWS WAF can be improved by simplifying the tuning process to reduce false positives and providing more built-in dashboards for better visibility and further customization."
"It's too early to talk about a return on investment with F5 Rules for AWS WAF."
"One area where F5 Rules for AWS WAF can be improved is in simplifying the tuning process."
"An area for improvement I see is that while everything is in good shape, I demand continuous improvisation of these rule sets."
"I think F5 Rules for AWS WAF could be improved mainly around visibility, specifically having more actionable recommendations for false positives."
"There are potential false positives in F5 Rules for AWS WAF that sometimes require tuning."
"To improve Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF, they need to work on automating SQL queries as there is still manual work involved in managing the rules."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF are very effective, but areas for improvement include better visibility into rule logic, deeper API schema validation, and advanced bot management features."
"I chose eight out of ten for my rating because there are some competitor software or applications that offer more advanced rules and policies."
"Overall, Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is a solid solution, but it could be improved with more granular customization of managed rules, better visibility into why specific requests are blocked, more detailed reporting and analytics, and tighter integration with SIEM and SOAR platforms for incident response, which would add value."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF should have AI-driven threat detection to reduce false positives, and the UI should be improved."
"My core concern regarding the product lies in the reporting functions, where I face limitations, particularly tenant-wise."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is strong overall, but there are a few areas where improvements could make it even more effective."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF can be improved by enhancing the dashboard and fine-tuning it depending on what service will be protected."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Rules Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
33%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Computer Software Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Construction Company
27%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Logistics Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Rules for AWS WAF?
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for F5 Rules for AWS WAF was good with purchasing and the setup cost.
What needs improvement with F5 Rules for AWS WAF?
The additional costs for F5 Rules for AWS WAF are quite high, as F5 managed rules require a separate subscription on top of the standard AWS WAF charges; it would be great if it would be pre-integr...
What is your primary use case for F5 Rules for AWS WAF?
F5 Rules for AWS WAF manages the security rule set by applying the rules and setting the block directly in AWS WAF to provide advanced protection against web application attacks, bots, threats, and...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
The pricing was reasonable considering the automatic updates, FortiGuard threat intelligence, and reduced operational effort.
What needs improvement with Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
Overall, Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is a solid solution, but it could be improved with more granular customization of managed rules, better visibility into why specific requests are blocked...
What is your primary use case for Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
My main use case for Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is to protect our internal intranet sites and to publish some load as we are using it there. Regarding my main use case, ease of adoption, ru...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs. Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.