


Find out what your peers are saying about F5, NetScaler, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).
The major return on investment is the security of our data.
The alert system is efficient, sending alerts within a fraction of a second if any power issues arise.
I would rate the technical support of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) nine out of ten.
Overall, my experience with F5 is very good compared to Radware.
Customer support is quite good but could be faster.
The support team is knowledgeable and efficiently assists with automation and configuration problems.
It varies depending on the engineer assigned; in most cases, we resolve issues on the first attempt.
Fortinet technical support is very good, and they provide us with better support.
We have not received technical support from Kemp LoadMaster without a license.
For those opting for a SaaS or cloud solution, there is scalability and flexibility.
It is scalable for some versions, however, as components reach their end of support, upgrades are necessary to maintain scalability.
Kemp LoadMaster is a scalable solution.
The support system is reliable when issues like automation or configuration arise.
Overall, it has been good; in the past it was very good, and now it is still performing well.
We have two applications in two ESXi hosts that I integrated into our ADC, and I created one virtual IP in the virtual server pool.
With the license purchase afterwards, if it expires, it begins dropping the HTTP traffic, also the DNS traffic.
I expect faster resolutions when providing contact numbers while raising cases, as other companies typically do.
The pricing of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is on the higher side compared to competitors, but it is worth it.
Fortinet has been a pioneer for enterprise solutions, such as firewalls, SASE, ZTNA, and SD-WAN solutions, and they are in a leader quadrant.
The limitation of managing all components and the differing versions pose challenges.
If I need design help, they do not assist; they say it is a design issue they cannot support, and I must approach the system integrator.
After that, they said if it was good, we could purchase the license, and while we found it very good, the license cost was too high.
The product is costly.
This solution is quite expensive compared to Kemp.
The impact of SSL offloading on reducing server load and latency is very much positive because whatever traffic we receive, we encrypt at our F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) level, which has definitely reduced the additional load and SSL decryption load on the servers, so it has very much helped us and it is very smooth; it will not take much time and will not impact our regular traffic.
R-series has better CPU and memory, leading to higher throughput with minimal downtime, making it a significant improvement over the I-series.
One of the most beneficial features of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is its ability to identify compromised traffic and its capabilities in authentication.
I use server load balancing and employ layer seven features, which provide more granular traffic shaping and detailed logs.
When integrated with FortiAnalyzer, it has much more significance.
The implementation process is straightforward, and cluster implementation is also very easy.
We had some issues in patching management, so we deployed this product for virtual patching, the IPS rule, and it gives us very good results because we have very critical servers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | 14.3% |
| Fortinet FortiADC | 9.7% |
| Kemp LoadMaster | 6.8% |
| Other | 69.2% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 62 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 86 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
F5 BIG-IP LTM optimizes the speed and reliability of your apps via both network and application layers. Using real-time protocol and traffic management decisions based on app and server and connection management conditions, and TCP and content offloading, BIG-IP LTM dramatically improves application and infrastructure responsiveness. BIG-IP LTM's architecture includes protocol awareness to control traffic for the most important applications. BIG-IP LTM tracks the dynamic performance levels of servers and delivers SSL performance and visibility for inbound and outbound traffic, to protect the user experience by encrypting everything from the client to the server.
BIG-IP LTM provides enterprise-class Application Delivery Controller (ADC). You get granular layer 7 control, SSL offloading and acceleration capabilities, and advanced scaling technologies that deliver performance and reliability on-demand. The highly optimized TCP/IP stack combines TCP/IP techniques and improvements in the latest RFCs with extensions to minimize the effect of congestion and packet loss and recovery. Independent testing tools and customer experiences show LTM's TCP stack delivers up to a 2x performance gain for users and a 4x increase in bandwidth efficiency.
Fortinet FortiADC is a robust application delivery controller (ADC) that delivers application optimization, application security, and application availability. FortiADC is a valued offering from Fortinet, which is widely recognized as a trusted supplier of dynamic security solutions worldwide. FortiADC offers dynamic security functions (AV, DDoS, and WAF) in addition to advanced application connectors for a simplified deployment and complete transparency to an organization's networks and applications. FortiADC offers three primary deployment options: physical machine, virtual machine, (VM) and cloud solution options.
Fortinet FortiADC Benefits
Fortinet FortiADC Features
Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.
Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.