Fortinet FortiADC vs Fortinet FortiWeb comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiADC
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (8th)
Fortinet FortiWeb
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiADC is 11.5%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiWeb is 5.6%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
9.7%
 

Featured Reviews

Andrew Reynolds - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 20, 2024
Has OWASP Top Ten feature for automated protection and can do offline patches without causing customer outages
I like the load-balancing components because they are very straightforward. The interface is easy to get around and follows a very logical pattern and the API's are very easy to follow. The basic OWASP protections it offers in the web application firewall are also useful. The tool does what it says on the box. Setting up priority groups and using health monitors is easy. We can do patches offline to application servers without causing outages that would affect the customer. The web application firewall features, especially those related to the OWASP Top Ten, provide easily integrated and automated protections. This helps with legislative compliance for our Apps and for compliance with the PCI security standards. This allows more flexibility in patching the back end applications and it offers visibility into the requests being made to the applications - you can't protect what you can't see.
Blair Griffith-Barwell - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 17, 2023
It comes with several preconfigured rule sets and templates that make deploying new applications easier
One area that needs improvement is using IP addresses within templates. If you allow an IP address to access an application, you should be able to leave a description of that. For example, we allow clients to access these services, and some are restricted to the IP address. When you add an IP, there's no way within the product to say what the IP address is. We need to maintain a separate external list because we need to remove any IP address associated with a client if they stop using our services. In many other products, you can create an object specifying that this IP address is for a client of this name or this service. You don't have this ability within FortiWeb. Another area for improvement is logging. When troubleshooting, the logs sometimes take a while to update. We've had people report that some things aren't logged if they're successful. It's a bit hit-and-miss. For example, sometimes people access one of our services, and it's successful, but we don't see that in the logs.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"From a technical perspective, it is the most scalable device from Fortinet."
"It's a good product because it supports all the features that ADC solutions in the market can support, like F5 solutions, for example, such as the LTM of F5."
"Ease of use in deploying and having it up and running requires minimal knowledge."
"Because ADC is the intermediary between the servers and the end-user application, it gives thorough information about the traffic, what the problem is."
"The main feature that we use is GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing). GSLB makes the customer's network more reliable by scaling applications across multiple datacenters. GSLB as a disaster recovery solution can direct traffic based on site availability."
"We can do patches offline without causing customers outages. The web application firewall features, especially those related to the OWASP Top Ten, provide automated protections. This allows more flexibility in patching the backend applications. Additionally, it offers visibility into the requests being made to the applications, and you can't protect what you can't see."
"The solution provides high-level services such as availability, redundancy, and load balancing between servers."
"Although FortiADC has multiple features that I like, the global DNS is the most helpful. It is primarily useful for customers with huge environments and at least two data centers. FortiADC can act as your DNS server. It can check which data center has the lowest latency, and route traffic to that one. It's an intelligent DNS."
"The policies and the filtering are the most valuable features, especially traffic, URL, and application filtering. The solution is excellent at detecting vulnerabilities."
"All the features that FortiGate contains are very suitable for our business. We work with other products in Fortinet, FortiWeb, FortiSandbox, FortiMail, and FortiCache. We use all UTM features like self-encryption, encryption, all UTM features."
"Provides good vulnerability scanning, IPS, and geolocalization."
"One main feature we are very happy about is file security and upload functionality."
"The solution is easy to configure and deploy."
"The WAF profiles has been effective at mitigating web-based threats."
"Some of the threat detection analytics and the filtering capabilities they give us for filtering a certain type of information that we don't want coming into the site are its valuable features. The analytics are pretty good in terms of being able to see what threats have been detected and mitigated, where they're coming from, and things like that."
"FortiWeb is easy to operate with a reasonably high level of protection. FortiWeb provides multiple deployment options with a physical or virtual (FortiWeb-VM) appliance, and acts either as a reverse/transparent proxy or out-of-band. It is also available on AWS and Azure."
 

Cons

"The product’s price could be reduced. Also, some of its features need to be more advanced."
"The L7 Persistent load-balancing algorithm has not worked for me after having tested it many times with my customer's in-house application. I'd like to suggest that the company make sure that all load-balancing algorithms work properly with most applications, even those that are in-house apps."
"Fortinet FortiADC should include an advanced-level SD-WAN."
"Because it is so generic, the documentation requires special attention. A person who has not worked on Fortinet FortiADC or a similar product will struggle to understand what the document is trying to say. The documentation could be more specific, and more detailed."
"Fortinet has some drawbacks, and it can be a bit challenging to scale."
"There is a mismatch between the number of features they are offering and the device capacity on how much it can handle."
"The product's stability for VMs could be better."
"FortiADC is complex to configure so the interface should be improved."
"I would like to see more improvements with respect to threat intelligence."
"Maybe the load balancing options could be enhanced."
"In terms of performance, it needs to be more robust."
"Fortinet FortiWeb is not scalable. You'll need more budget to change the hardware."
"The dashboard evaluating the performance of each application connected to the web app's firewall is quite helpful, but the tool is only available in application performance management. So I think if Fortinet could better integrate that particular feature, it would add a lot of value to the product."
"The F5 solution has more features than Fortinet FortiWeb, such as multiple load balancing."
"A better load balancer is needed when multiple servers are used for the same website."
"F5 and some other firewalls are easier to customize. FortiWeb could be more flexible and customizable. The documentation could also be improved because many of the advanced features aren't fully documented."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution could be more cost-effective."
"Compared to F5, FortiADC pricing is better."
"The price is competitive"
"The product has affordable pricing."
"The product has average pricing. I rate its pricing a five out of ten."
"The solution's pricing is an issue and should be improved."
"I rate Fortinet FortiADC's pricing one out of ten. It is fixed."
"The solution is less expensive than F5 or Imperva and is the most reasonably priced option available."
"The license to use Fortinet FortiWeb is approximately $14,000."
"Cheaper than others."
"It is an expensive suite and it is an expensive solution, but it is a manageable one for an enterprise."
"There's only one payment for the duration of the license. On a scale from one to five, I would rate pricing at four. I have not encountered any additional costs on my projects involving Fortinet FortiWeb."
"​It really pays off to buy licences for multiple years​."
"The price of Fortinet FortiWeb is expensive in our Ethiopian currency."
"The pricing is average; the product is neither particularly expensive nor affordable."
"There are no licensing costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc.
Do you recommend Fortinet FortiADC?
I recommend Fortinet FortiADC. My experience with Fortinet has been very positive. Our company has been using it for around five years. We mainly use FortiADC for the load balancing of application ...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiADC?
The user interface is very easy and integrates with Sandbox easily.
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiWeb?
The WAF profiles has been effective at mitigating web-based threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiWeb?
It's not cheap, but it's not expensive either. It depends on the features you need and whether you choose hardware or a virtual machine. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, where one is hig...
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiWeb?
Maybe the load balancing options could be enhanced. FortiWeb provides very good protection for web applications, web servers, and mobile apps, but the load-balancing capabilities and mechanisms are...
 

Also Known As

FortiADC Application Delivery Controller, FortiADC
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: June 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.