F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs TeamViewer Tensor comparison

F5 and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Access category. F5 is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2, while TeamViewer is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5. F5 holds a 1.3% mindshare in VUS, compared to TeamViewer’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2024

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager APM and TeamViewer Tensor compete in the network access and remote access categories. TeamViewer Tensor seems to have the upper hand in remote access due to its simplicity, while F5 BIG-IP APM excels in network access control and support.

Features: F5 BIG-IP APM offers granular access controls, integration with other F5 products, and superior support. TeamViewer Tensor is known for its ease of use, extensive remote access features, and comprehensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: F5 BIG-IP APM needs a more intuitive configuration process, better performance analytics, and less complexity. TeamViewer Tensor requires better customer service response times, more support for large-scale deployments and lacks some advanced features compared to F5 BIG-IP APM.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 BIG-IP APM deployment can be complex and time-consuming, but offers excellent customer support. TeamViewer Tensor is easier to deploy, but customer service response times are slower compared to F5 BIG-IP APM. The simplicity of TeamViewer Tensor makes it suitable for quick setups, despite slower customer service.

Pricing and ROI: F5 BIG-IP APM has higher setup costs but provides significant ROI through its security and network control features. TeamViewer Tensor offers a lower initial cost and quick ROI due to its efficient remote management capabilities. Despite higher initial costs, F5 BIG-IP APM is seen as worth the investment for its advanced security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. TeamViewer Tensor Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. TeamViewer Tensor

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 9.4%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer Tensor is 6.5%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Access

Featured Reviews

Joseph Merusi

Collaborations engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Everything has worked better since we started using it

Sometimes the syncing is inconsistent. I'm confident that the devices are checking in every eight hours, but sometimes the devices aren't picking up the settings as quickly as I would expect. Some features haven't been updated in a while, and Microsoft doesn't seem interested in developing them. Unless you talk to an engineer, you don't know whether there will be an update. There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now. Some reporting areas still need development. For example, I noticed that the reporting for driver updates is still confusing.

Read full review

Ashish Kumar Rai

Associate Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Offers remote access control, good GUI and easy to configure

I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal. In the APM interface itself, they could add direct hyperlinks to relevant online documentation. This would provide easy access to admin guides and other resources when working within the GUI.

Read full review

IanWeekes

Technical Architect at National Grid

A cost-effective cloud solution to work on multiple devices

TeamViewer Tensor supports internal and external customers with IT support issues, enabling them to work on multiple operating systems and devices, such as laptops, desktops, tablets, and phones We focused on ensuring seamless connectivity to all devices and operating systems. At the time of its…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Implementing Microsoft Intune has provided a more streamlined and consistent method for device management across our multiple domains, effectively consolidating our administrative efforts."

"Autopilot is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune."

"The ability to work from all over the planet is valuable. You just need a functioning and working Internet connection."

"The features I found most valuable in Intune are its user visibility and troubleshooting options."

"It has a useful device management feature."

"It is a cloud solution, and you can easily scale as your needs grow."

"Intune's most valuable feature is its centralized management capability."

"The navigation, the keys, and the settings are easy to find. It is easy to understand."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"I rate the overall solution nine out of ten."

"F5 BIG-IP APM is relatively easy to use."

"The performance of the solution is valuable."

"The tool is reliable and easy to configure."

"The portal access was very good."

"Stickiness is the most valuable feature of the product."

"I recommend F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) to others due to its reliability, and it is perceived as critical to security infrastructure."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) pros

"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer Tensor is the remote access."

"Remote desktop sharing is one valuable feature of the solution."

"This product is very simple to use and you can connect whether you are behind a firewall or not."

Cons

"The UI is not user-friendly and has room for improvement."

"It would be better if I could integrate it with my core group policy. I would like to have a group policy in my current environment, which has strict control, but those things are still missing. Although it has maximum compliance and security, it's not available on-premise."

"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."

"Microsoft Intune could enhance its patch management for various devices, ensuring regular updates and tracking of device privileges."

"A feature I would want to see added in Microsoft Intune is the ability to manage other non-Microsoft devices."

"Sometimes, the process is unsuccessful when we attempt to reset a device and wipe the data using Intune."

"They should improve its compatibility with other operating systems such as iOS and Linux. It supports Linux but they still need to work on the iOS part."

"Microsoft Intune could improve in reporting data for endpoints and fleets. Enhanced capabilities to run queries and gather specific device data to identify trends or issues would be beneficial. The feature parity for MacOS and handling devices from an MDM perspective is not comprehensive. Consolidation of these functionalities within Intune would simplify processes and finances."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better"

"The price of this product can be improved."

"The operational deployment is not great."

"The initial setup was complex."

"The main improvement needed for F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is to integrate into the cloud-delivered services from F5."

"I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal."

"In my opinion, the GUI side needs some improvement based on my usage. Sometimes, it doesn't work as efficiently as the CLI side."

"The technical support’s response time must be improved."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) cons

"Having the ability to create subgroups and delegate permissions to the group members would be a helpful addition."

"The solution could include more AI (Artificial Intelligence)."

"The SSO feature of the solution may sometimes not function perfectly…Pricing might be improved for TeamViewer Tensor."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not that aware of the pricing, but as compared to other MDM solutions, Microsoft is providing a lot of things at the organizational level. So, it is quite reasonable as compared to other MDM solutions."

"The price for Intune is fair."

"If you ask the accountant or the finance department, they'll tell you that it is way too expensive, but when I look at the cost and compare it with the value you actually get, it's more than fair."

"It's affordable. In comparison to the competitors, the price depends on what features you need from Intune, but it's affordable. There are no hidden costs, but there are some features that go for a premium price. Those are the add-ons for which you have to pay extra."

"Microsoft Intune is moderately priced. There is a monthly license required to use the solution and it is approximately eight dollars per month."

"The product is expensive."

"It is reasonable. When you have Microsoft 365 E3 or E5 license, it is already licensed in that license. So, you could say it is free."

"We don't get Intune as a separate module. Most of the time, we use it within an enterprise agreement like E3 or E5. Those licenses are at a good price, but what is annoying is that every single year they go higher."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"Recently, they have simplified the licensing"

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The product is very expensive."

"The tool is a little bit expensive."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side."

"I rate pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high. There are no additional costs attached to the licensing of the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

F5 products are more expensive than other solutions but are valued for their quality and reliability, akin to purchas...

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM ( /categories/application-performance-monitoring-apm-and-observability )) does n...

See all answers

Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?

The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By f...

See all answers

What do you like most about TeamViewer Tensor?

The most valuable feature of TeamViewer Tensor is the remote access.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer Tensor?

Our company chose the corporate licensing option for the solution, but TeamViewer Tensor attempted to push us towards...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 13% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Ivanti Connect Secure vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 10% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 9% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 7% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 4% of the time

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Competitors

TeamViewer vs TeamViewer Tensor

Compared 86% of the time

BeyondTrust Remote Support vs TeamViewer Tensor

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs TeamViewer Tensor

Compared 2% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs TeamViewer Tensor

Compared 2% of the time

Splashtop Remote Support vs TeamViewer Tensor

Compared 2% of the time

More TeamViewer Tensor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

April 2025

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

May 2025

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) report

Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

May 2025

Download TeamViewer Tensor product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

F5 Access Policy Manager

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Intune provides centralized management of mobile devices and applications, ensuring security, compliance, and productivity through integration with Microsoft services like Microsoft 365 and Azure Active Directory.

Organizations use Intune for managing mobile devices and applications, enhancing security and compliance across platforms. With features like single sign-on, conditional access, and zero-touch deployment via Autopilot, it facilitates efficient operations. Intune's scalability, easy enrollment, and capabilities such as remote wipe support diverse device management, offering robust data protection and efficient operation. Despite its features, improvement areas include reporting, compatibility with non-Microsoft devices, and better support for macOS and Linux devices.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Seamless Integration: Works with Microsoft 365, Azure Active Directory, and System Center for streamlined management.
Conditional Access: Enhances security with policies that restrict access based on conditions.
Autopilot: Provides zero-touch deployment for setting up new devices efficiently.
Mobile Device Management: Enables control over both personal and corporate devices.
Application Deployment: Facilitates app delivery across a range of devices.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Centralized Management: Reduces complexity by managing devices and applications in one place.
Security Enhancement: Protects data with features like remote wipe and compliance monitoring.
Improved Productivity: Enhances efficiency with seamless integration and automation features.
Device Scalability: Supports diverse device management for growing business needs.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and education, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure secure and compliant device management. Companies leverage its capabilities to deploy security policies and manage both corporate-owned and BYOD environments, facilitating a unified approach to data protection and compliance.

Microsoft

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is an access management proxy solution for managing global access to the enterprise networks, cloud providers, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs). Through a single management interface, BIG-IP APM consolidates remote, mobile, network, virtual, and web access.

BIG-IP APM can also serve as a bridge between modern and classic authentication and authorization protocols and methods. For applications which are unable to support modern authentication and authorization protocols, like SAML and OAuth with OIDC, but which do support classic authentication methods, BIG-IP APM converts user credentials to the appropriate authentication standard supported by the application.

BIG-IP APM Benefits:

Ease of use
Flexibility
Ability to integrate with other systems
Security features
Granular access control
Responsive and helpful support team

BIG-IP APM Features:

Support for Identity Aware Proxy (IAP) enabling Zero Trust application access
Context-based authorization with dynamic L4/L7 ACLs
Integration with third-party MFA solutions
DTLS 2.0 mode for delivering and securing applications
SAML 2.0 identity federation support
Support for OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol
SSO support for classic authentication (Kerberos, header- based, etc.), credential caching, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, and FIDO2 (U2F)
AAA server authentication and high-availability
Integration with leading IAM vendor products (Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity)
BIG IP Edge Client and F5 Access integrate with VMware Horizon ONE (AirWatch), Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360
Risk-based access leveraging third-party UEBA and risk engines (HTTP Connector)

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by BIG-IP APM users.

Mahmmoud Rabie, Senior Site Reliability Engineer, writes that BIG-IP APM is "A highly stable solution for load balancing, but the initial setup is complex."

Clyde Livingston, Senior Process Specialist at Telstra, says that BIG-IP APM is "Easy to use, useful access remotely, but lacking stability."

Chris Lam, Senior Solution Consultant at Macroview Telecom Limited, states that BIG-IP APM is "Useful for remote access VPN and VPI integration with VMware.

TeamViewer Tensor™ is a cloud-based enterprise connectivity platform enabling large-scale IT management framework deployments quickly and easily. Built upon the world’s largest remote connection infrastructure already covering 200 countries and connecting more than 2 billion devices, TeamViewer Tensor™ scales linearly to the needs of your enterprise, providing the industry’s leading connectivity and real-time support tools in a convenient, ready-to-deploy SaaS environment.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office

GE Oil & Gas, Android Police, Smartlaunch

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. TeamViewer Tensor

April 2025

Free Report: F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. TeamViewer Tensor

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. TeamViewer Tensor and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. TeamViewer Tensor report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.